BAN THE PORN BAN THE PORN BAN THE PORN

no, they just weaken the men now, until they get liquidated by real men who WILL kill and rape. It's happening in Europe already.
Faggot

A big problem here is that the 10/10 women do not find a suitable man. Since the 10/10 men can and will easily take a 9/10. So the best women end up alone or at least childless here.

Attached: birds.jpg (600x450, 79.55K)

Tinder, escorts, kik=easy pussy. Pussy is cheap and readily available. And that's the problem. There's no reason to invest in a stable relationship at all. Actual changes at the state and federal level is what's needed. Ending child support, common law marriage and alimony is the first step.

Depends on how you define best genes. I remember reading an article about a nigger that impregnated over 13 women and sired over 70 children in Tenessee. Also notice how women flock to murderers. Was an article about a woman that married a serial killer in prison recently. "Best genes" depends on your values. If you value civilization, IQ, high trust et cetera, these traits are not being selected for because women are apparently not programmed to select for these things. If you value narcissism, violence, low trust, ability to produce lots of children without raising them then I assume the status quo is right for you.

>men with the best genes get to pass on their superior genes

Attached: JEd3ke5.png (353x638, 336.86K)

>women never drove human evolution, ever.

Attached: 14c.jpg (600x733, 29.17K)

Best genes also probably have no use for porn so are you missing the point on purpose? It is about the fact that the remaining 80% get no women and now you want to take away their substitute. Either leave both porn and current dating format intact or take both away.

Here you go user

Attached: 1577278663103m.jpg (1024x780, 163.12K)

t. coom brain

See

Attached: 1577274905242m.jpg (1024x492, 59.2K)

Oh, I suppose you're correct.
Pre-Columbian women SELECTED Spanish Conquistadors for the good genes.
All those Asian women SELECTED Mongols for their fantastic genes.
The Vikings had Genes so fucking great the Women all the way down in the Indian subcontinent spread their legs for them -- no raping and killing was ever involved.
I can go on.
Germanic tribes?
Moors?

yup, absolutely no raping and killing at all. just bitches recognizing good genes

>Why are there no threads and no discussion about banning social media and dating sites that contribute to the consumption of porn(pic related)?
Because we can't do anything about it?

Can't say I feel much sympathy for women who make themselves unhappy by their own choice, because the illusory choice is so big and they have no idea it is illusory in the first place.

The problem is that even if you end these things, society is too far gone. There will be no solution for anyone alive currently, even if there were a viable movement pushing for these changes. Perhaps if you implement things to fix the problems, you will create a future for current generations. And let's say that suddenly these changes were implemented. Are you really going to form a family/stable relationship with a woman who has been getting dicked down by strangers every weekend, doing drugs with wiggers and niggers, kind of fat/covered in tattoos or already has kids? Nah, it's already too late. Civilization will have to fall/be replaced. It's literally why they import immigrants, they know families will not be formed among natives.

A must watch for all anons.
youtu.be/kOMkl3ApTK0

Hold up let me think of some famous female scientists....... err I can't.

So just rollover and let it happen? Beta blackpilled faggots like you are the reason why nothing ever gets done.

This is the revival of natural selection, you repulsive incel cucks. You're dead-end genetics are being rooted out for the betterment of the human race.

Attached: 80834048_2469783683339133_7291372576041861120_n (1).jpg (539x960, 44.08K)

Your*

I never said roll over and let it happen. I said even if the solutions were implemented tonight, it's too late to save the gene pool or civilization. It will literally take centuries of selective breeding to get back to where we were 100 years ago. By all means, let's focus on implementing a change for future generations; but let's not pretend that it will improve our situation.

people are animals. every person emits indicators of genetic fitness. social success is a huge indicator. if you have no social value, it's an indicator that your offspring won't, either. of course women don't want their kid to be a loser

>most human procreation was via rape
>my evidence is a handful of events where rape happened
incel fantasy cope

Let it happen but don't rollover. Just don't play. Find value in yourself and don't care about what will happen in 100 years or about the fact that you can't do anything, about women being worthless waste of time and space for men below 9/10.

Exactly, even if you get rich doesn't have any relation with genes. How I know that? Well, look at how many people got rich just for their heirs to fuck it all up. Too many to count.

The only genes that are real superior are that make generation after generation more smarter or more adept to who knows, survive inside a volcano, space or even the surface of the sun. Sounds very retarded but I think that this is the final game foi evolutionary biology. A high intelegient being that can fuck around exact how he want it.
The only pre-requisite for the human race would to maintain the humanoid white appearance (rest, really? 50 shades of gray towards the brow shit color? Let just discard that).
The problem is not with the people you fucking OP faggot, the problem is with laws and morals that allow womans to be cheap whores without consequences. That's the real problem, feminism infiltrated in the code of law or the morals standards of society. In their vision is great, in the society vision, other terms, decent man get just cast away, or cucked. Not gonna say that there's guys that manage to find a real prize and have a good and happy family but this is far from the norm. Is actually pretty rare nowadays.
Don't forget all the lesbians.

ok? what is your point, exactly? that a superior BBC passed on his genes into the gene pool while you did not?

>genetics
Being a basic bitch normie, you probably spend as much time on you appearance as those vain whores.

A fucking leaf

Attached: 1577588389186.jpg (400x400, 15.22K)

Again, it depends on what you value. Nigger genes, sociopathy, low IQ et cetera or high trust, high IQ and civilization creating genes. I mean, it all depends on your axiom of values. If you value mud huts, rape, short term flings and nigger dick then sure its superior. I'd like to live in a 1890s esque America with a family on a farm with a tight knit community; so this doesn't fit my axiom of values.

The most intesting and good looking female gets no one?

>handful of events
It's literally what is responsible for all demographics today. You're so caught up in the propaganda of fierce individualism that you don't even know how men in nature operate. Human males are tribal, attack in groups, and gangrape.
You don't think about this because you've been brainwashed to be repulsed by what your primitive mind instinctually knows is true. Women are property, always were, always will be. Right now, they're owned by the state.

Yes, a whole lot. Stop tearing up you pencil-necked geek.

>It's literally what is responsible for all demographics today.
No. Some of those may have contributed to demographics, even significantly. However, most offspring in history was not conceived through rape but through regular sexual selection. Believing this is why you're a dangerous incel who should be monitored by police.

Unironically yes. They are catapulted into a state of pure and absolute narcissism in which they are self-enchanted and view all other human beings as twisted abominations.

whatev, my daughter is probably older than you and hotter too.

>tearing up
No, just telling you what's what because you seem to think you're a big deal, when you're not.

They need 12/10 at least.

This. What do mates provide women? Protection and access to resources. Men would use their physical attributes to ensure protection and use intellectual attributes to provide access to resources. Now, protection is provided by police and access to resources are provided by welfare state. The government is essentially their husband. Which is essentially why women are free to get dicked down by random dudes whenever they want; there are no consequences. It goes without saying that such a system cannot stand, but it most likely will take us down before it falls. Whatever comes from the ashes of civilization, let the offspring of degenerates and mongrels fight for mud huts and compete in a more primitive way for survival.

No, it's the beginning of dysgenics. Women have no ability to pick correct males besides dick size and facial structure. Yet it is autistic rage filled manlets who have changed the world the most. Women being given the power over selection guarantees lower IQ across the board.

>autistic rage filled manlets who have changed the world the most.
What would his Tinder profile be?

Attached: 4cohfv2c0ds21.png (720x1280, 359.41K)

This. I watched a YouTube video recently that presented a study where females judged a mate based on 5 minute conversation in a blind date. The females predicted they would value intelligence, wit, social skill, and physical attractiveness in that order. But it was literally the opposite. They valued physical attractiveness primarily. Which kind of strikes me odd among coal burners because to me niggers look like gorillas, but apparently that's what they find attractive.

ironically, the reason why women haven't been able to contribute to society is because they weren't allowed to contribute to society in the first place, because they haven't been able to contribute to society.

sure, women might be less mentally capable of discovering the same feats as men were able to, even if they had the same position, but for the most part that's highly unlikely considering how they have been various women throughout history that have advanced the arts, science, and technology without having access to the resources or cultural respect that men had

>takes away from womans pussy monopoly
>much cleaner than real roasties because no chance to get herpes, other stds or babys
>not degenerate like hookup culture
>can be obtained for FREE
>makes men spend much less on roasties
>even guys who cant get laid can see naked 10/10s
>boosts your immune system to fight off Coronachan

yep Porn and Masturbation is based (and life saving)

Attached: MilaAzul_TD_15_2160p2.webm (1280x674, 2.96M)

>Women have no ability to pick correct males besides dick size
Been watching that TV too much, women don't know much about dick size because the overwhelming majority is average

>Name: Adolf Hitler, but you can just call me Hitler
>Interests: Saving europe, reviving the German people, Taking back what was taken from us, Veganism
>Dislikes: Jews, commie Jews, Lying sticking Jews, Russian crypto Jews, Amerifats, Anne Frank
>"Only msg me if you are blonde, blue eyed, German, Aryan, and willing to die for Germany.

No one is saying that women aren't capable of engineering, medicine or mathematics; on the contrary many of them are. Are they as good as the elite men in the fields? On average no. However, what we are saying is that these women with high IQs that are capable have far fewer children (plenty of data supports this). Which woman contributes more to society?
1.) 130 IQ woman who has zero kids and works as an engineer
2.) 130 IQ woman who is a housewife and has 6 kids

ok incel

The eternal roastie has seen enough dick to know.

It's not the single mom's fault, it's the lack of a father because freud
Called electra/oedipus complex

No not really, been with roasties. They are always shocked and awed by my 8" dick with massive girth that is perfectly straight. I honestly never had a clue most men's dicks are crooked till I fucked a roastie. Giant dick isn't that great, women struggle with it and you hurt them all. Wish it was 7"

>I like painting. Not too sure what to share with you. I feel lost. Like my life is without purpose or meaning. I ask myself if I want a family, but then I question if that’s just what I’ve been told I want. I truly enjoy a good book. Political, historical, and philosophy are mainly what I read. When it really comes down to it I just want to help people.

>The females predicted they would value intelligence
No, that is what they pretended to predict. Women hate truth, even if they actually know or understand it. Each one of them knew how other women would value men, they just pretend they don't.

Your logic is literally that a roastie has been with a ton of men in the 99th percentile when in reality the chances of fucking a 99th percentile person is 1 in 100

Same, but mine is 13" but with a curve upwards for maximum pleasure. Mogged.

>1 in 100
>he thinks the average roastie hasn't see 100 dicks
Oh to be naive and pure still.

6” long, 6” circumference.
Curved up to tickle the gspot.

I'd put the average roastie around 30-40. I think you're extra frustrated from inceldom judging by your hyperbolic tantrum

This desu.
I was with a 19yo not too long ago. She said she’d been with 5 men. That’s admission though, so most likely 10-15.

Damn he was even the first one to use Instagram filters.

Attached: aXbwZYV_460s.jpg (440x349, 43.79K)

He literally is assuming that there is a 1:1 ratio, one man for one women. In reality, the average chad can get 20 women a month. Most of them are not going to be top 10% of women, because men will do what is necessary to get free poon (i.e. pretend that his eyes are exclusively on her if necessary). As a consequence, hypergamy chart referenced in the OP is fairly accurate.