Religion is not backed by science. Religion has no basis in reality...

>off topic
It's not.

>"Le edgelord atheist"
Fucking kafir

Attached: 4EECCAB8-BB06-4254-8D2E-4C21297EF622.jpg (749x754, 53.26K)

Argue for the Big Bang past “muh expansion”. Taking a hardline against religion in the name of Science is literally just as much a leap of faith

May God have mercy on your spiteful Jewish soul

clearly you're some sideways science cultist, so i'll make a hyperbolic statement about your religion.
hide all you want but you're still going to die one day and all your pseudo intellectual bs wont mean a thing
you're a history channel atheist type, i get it, you're a child who has no understanding of the world. that's why you're a single minded, single topic focused moron.
i bet you're some kind of communist as well
>reee muh logic and reason will work this time
good luck

Religious concepts can be reified, with the information treated respectfully. Immortality beckons if we will reach for the salvation of every life. Is not all within creation within the grace of god? We can do better with that than "divine right".

Furthermore, the operations of religion can be regularized.

Sandnigger leaf. Your opinions don't matter, go ahead and rope

>Religion is not backed by science. Religion has no basis in reality.
It is, though. Read From Logos to Bios.

Science is a religion. m.youtube.com/watch?v=FbRZTugb094

>U jew!
Nice try

How?

Science will not give you eternal life

>You child communist!
You make assumptions but have no real argument. Typical of a christcuck.

Will read

>le science is so BASED amirite guys!
>who’s up for some onions!? On me!!
Don’t forget your fedora on the way home to plebbit cringelord

Eternal life probably sucks

Lmao an atheist and a racist. What a lovely combo. Funny, most of you faggots never have the courage to say shit in person. Is it because your chastity belt is preventing you from putting some bass in your voice?

Imagine being white and a useless atheist. Please keep coping it’s getting my BBC hard as diamonds

Attached: 4962B41D-098E-4A32-B8DA-0E39C0C66AC5.jpg (640x630, 133.26K)

You have 0 evidence the Earth is older than 6000 years. You're going to say radiocarbon dating. Youre entire faith and beliefs about life and reality are based on radiocarbon dating. It doesnt even work.

Attached: PhotoGrid_1530377509896.jpg (2048x2048, 1.92M)

Radiometric*

>On me
I don't talk like a nigger, but nice try
> Onions, cringelord
Is the little christcuck angry?
>Back to plebbit
Don't post there, but you do

>saying "on me" is now ebonics
>saying "no u" unironically
You really are sóy

I would say it your face and you would do nothing about it. Funny how one word can cause you and your people to chimp out.

Belief in the Gospel which is the death burial and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ in the Bible is a matter of faith.

When the world didn't understand God by wisdom it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

It wasn't a lack of proof but an evil heart of unbelief.

Reminds me of a scripture where it mentions that God takes the wise in their own conceit.

>not inspecting what results it hd on society, both good and bad, and weighing them

Durr religion baad

My beliefs aren't based on that.

Rome was better when they were pagan.

Excepting notions of philosophic realism, because that is a whole can of worms, science has aligned itself with a priori mathematics. This means its claims aim for logical consistency moreso than experimental repeatability or empirical verification. Mathematicians conceal their metaphysical and epistemological commitments and paper over them with non-falsifiable a priori "truths," i.e. as a kind of religious clergy whose authority is unquestionable due to the merely logical consistency of the language they are communicated in.

Mathematics abstracts the objects it purports to explain to such a universal degree that it scarcely can be said to even describe objects that, in Bill Gaede's view for one, "have shape and location."

Think of social science using statistical evidence to justify and implement social engineering in a way that is transparently ideological, and take it from there to quantum physics, and back to Kabbalah, also Aquinas, and so on.

Keep crying onions sucker

Attached: 1532269918514.jpg (1080x1020, 71.68K)

They try to find what is true do they not?

Says the cuck who worships a spiteful kike god

They still are.

I noticed he didn't answer you. OP is dumb and doesn't even get it because blind and gay and fake

Religion is literally the strongest positive selection pressure in a species defined by its communal instincts, thats why atheists have always been a fringe movement you utter shrimp

No sadly not

like it or not
youtube.com/watch?v=Rib1FRpBzBI
youtube.com/watch?v=NUhL1cli4ug

That was the best. Made all you atheists look like bigger retards than you were before.

If religion is so unimportant, why is this thread here?

Attached: Synagogue.png (1000x595, 184.33K)

Why do you contemn the Lord? Why do men sin then get angry at the Lord for the punishment of their evil deeds?

>Religion is not backed by science. Religion has no basis in reality.
That's the whole point you fucking brainlet

>"my beliefs arent based on jumping on the bandwagon of Old Earth theory taught to me my entire life"
Ok.

Truth is only as plausible as the axioms and those relations between them that it is based upon. You can build a perfect edifice over top of a shit foundation and the whole thing will be garbage.

Worse, these people think every problem calls for a scientific or "scientistic" solution, that the world can only be understood through the reductive lens of pythagoreanism, platonism and neo-platonism, and, on the whole, those unquestioned axioms which are implied, not stated explicitly. It's good work if you can get it, but it doesn't rise to the level of "truth" that the history of philosophy has striven to cultivate.

They are indeed and they don't speak for Christians either. The Apostle Peter was never a pope but an elder and Peter was married something the Catholics forbid.

Sometimes you Christians say that God does not do anything because of free now you say he does do things. Why can't you people decide what is correct?
They believe in one God that's not pagan for me

So you admit the point of religion is not "to be coherent and make sense."
I can agree with that.
Religion IS incoherent and doesn't make sense as soon as you scratch the surface.

I never said it was unimportant

Some yes, some no. Do I have to explain how institutional powers can hold cultures hostage indefinitely with censorship, secrecy, tribalism, and the like? Yes, truth will out. But perhaps not in our lifetimes. I'm sure most of us are familiar with the idea of a scientific paradigm and all the nuisance involved in overturning it. It's sociological as well as scientific in scope.

I won't entertain you, or the cuck asking

>t. Talmudist
Satanic verses of the Talmud
realjewnews.com/?p=156
Jesus in the Talmud
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud

> For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
>Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
> Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
> Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

لأَنَّهُ هكَذَا أَحَبَّ اللهُ الْعَالَمَ حَتَّى بَذَلَ ابْنَهُ الْوَحِيدَ، لِكَيْ لَا يَهْلِكَ كُلُّ مَنْ يُؤْمِنُ بِهِ، بَلْ تَكُونُ لَهُ الْحَيَاةُ الأَبَدِيَّةُ

هَا إِنَّ الْعَذْرَاءَ تَحْبَلُ، وَتَلِدُ ابْناً، وَيُدْعَى عِمَّانُوئِيلَ!» أَيِ «اللهُ مَعَنَا

ثُمَّ قَالَ يَسُوعُ لِتَلامِيذِهِ: «إِنْ أَرَادَ أَحَدٌ أَنْ يَسِيرَ وَرَائِي، فَلْيُنْكِرْ نَفْسَهُ وَيَحْمِلْ صَلِيبَهُ وَيَتْبَعْنِي

فَأَجَابَهُ يَسُوعُ: «أَنَا هُوَ الطَّرِيقُ وَالْحَقُّ وَالْحَيَاةُ. لَا يَأْتِي أَحَدٌ إِلَى الآبِ إِلّا بِي

youtube.com/watch?v=k8a6rfi-iWY

Attached: HelloMuhammad2.png (1705x657, 463.97K)

Have you ever read the bible you tradcath faggot?
Your god is a spiteful piece of shit. I wouldn't worship him even if he was real.

We can say the same about Christians. Lots of Christians flood our countries with low IQ niggers for example.

This is so refreshing.
A religious person who admits religion is a fantasy that helps them live their lives.

God loves you more than anyone has ever loved you.

>tv shows, movies, comic books are to us as we are to the higher dimensional entities (i.e. comics: us :: us: angels)
>negative entities are weak & driven by fear. conquer your fear and they become irrelevant.

Heaven is the Sun & “God” is just the collective of all stars, who themselves are each a collective all of their planets harvested, sentient entities of goodness & love. This “collective of collectives” co-creates reality for each other. All love.

Every star is a sentient collective. Every star is a heaven unto itself. If you love in this toughest of dimensions, you get harvested into heaven when you die, where you live forever with your family and everything you loved in this life and it is beautiful forever.

The Egyptians called the “as above, so below” phenomenon correspondence. In this density, you can notice correspondences by picking up on what Jung called synchronicities.

Heaven is much like the Earth, but it radiates love. It changes and gets better as it orthogonally twists up into higher dimensions forever, outside of time,

The Egyptians visualized this transition as hieroglyphic humans walking 90 degrees up the walls.

You traverse the universe via the aether as sentient light.

The higher densities are outside/above time. All of your experiences (on Earth and forevermore) are captured holographically in the Akashic records for you and your family to view and interact with eternally. Those are kind of like home videos for your family, who live in paradise with all sorts of beautiful correspondences from your time on Earth.
Field of Reeds, Valhalla, Heaven, Elysian fields - all the same thing - the Sun. It's all about your partner and your family, love.

Attached: 1585241912265.jpg (900x844, 31.67K)

Yes, of course. Christianity, or Abrahamic Monotheism, has a similar trajectory. Scientism is a religion much like the former, simply using a different language. Same types of foundations, same labyrinthine justificatory enterprise. Same pathetic institutional hypocrisy, bad faith protectionism, and on and on.

You don't need radiocarbon dating to determine the Earth is older than 6000 years. Dendro dates even extend back farther than that.

Attached: Mary Joseph and wait for it.....jpg (616x483, 88.22K)

I guess believing things only with faith is reddit

I mean....you do wear a fedora....and you do live your philosophical life around something you don't believe in....if you want me to respond seriously to you, have a serious argument. How is atheism any better as a belief system? Does it elevate humans above anything more than the result of chemical reactions? Does it instill morality? Does it prevent any of the social ills you most likely claim to be caused by religion? Atheism only really offers hedonism as a "positive" and hedonism has destroyed our civilization. Id rather feign belief due to the communal cohesiveness that faith can bring than come over to your way of thinking.

I have read the Bible and I don't see spite in it but I see people constantly tempting the Lord constantly going against what he's telling them to do and then getting mad when they get punished. I also see imperfect people in it who did honor the Lord and were rewarded greatly. If the creator of all things wishes for us to be humble and to be just and to love Justice and to help the poor and fatherless, why do you contemn these precepts?

>Science is just another modeling tool that attempts to describe the infinite, negentropic, holofractal Lorenz system that is reality

Infinite: Egyptians interpreted this as a recursive type of infinity, which can be best seen in the Ouroboros or the geometry of the Torus. The beginning is the end is the beginning.

Negentropic: light and life is inherently anti-entropic. This is achieved through orthogonal dimensions.

Holofractal: the all is reflected in the individual. The Big Bang, the Nile, Ptah, Pangaea, your conception - these are all holofractal representations of the same thing: the beginning of a universe.

Lorenz system (see diagram): a fixture in chaos theory, these systems describe how a polarized order (highly sensitive to initial conditions) emerges out of chaos. In our case on Earth, the two most pressing poles are that of Good and Evil. Light never dies. Heaven and Hell are forever - the seeds of which are sown in this life.

Attached: 1585241983485.png (850x610, 93.22K)

Science is not backed by science. Your personality has no basis in science and does not exist. You fail your own argument.

It's pointless, man.
They're just going to say the devil put fake radiocarbon dating information around the world to deceive you.
Or that god put it there to test your faith.
Just pointless.

The path to happiness is through the erasire of desire....which is in itself a desire. Buddhism is the ultimate catch 22 of religions at it's core.

Listen man, just cause you’re an atheist doesn’t make you better or smarter than anyone else. You’re just as miserable as the next guy who frequents this shitty site and thinks he’s enlightened on how the world works. If seeing a happy Christian family makes you seethe, then you’re the one who is fucked up.

Haha wtf is up with all the bible thumpers on here?

You think there's no basis for dark matter? Try looking it up first chimps. Its literally the only way to explain galactic spin in the way it does.

Well I guess there is one other way you might explain it, "a giant invisible bearded man in the sky is moving billions and billions of stars in a way that doesnt add up to what we see in the visible universe, despite the fact he created an impossibly complex perfect natural system for their movement."

Science is not backed by science. Your personality has no basis in science and does not exist. You fail to exist by your own argument.