C*tholics

What is that crap

why is protestant Bible censored? why does it not contain several books of old Testament that even Jesus have read ( septuaginta) . Have you read book of Tobit? Have you read book of Sirach? Have you read book of Wisdom?

Attached: 2877b57a7c43b465086268d9761906b181a951dc0cd751c26286e17510597fb5.png (1341x216, 84.75K)

According to that you should be a Jehovah's Witness then

I have
They're not part of the bible, they're apocryphal

>Roman catholics produced the Bible maymay

Attached: 1546713800063.jpg (364x1024, 54.6K)

They're not christian

They adopted the Masoretic Text just so they can be not-Catholic. It's so bad because the Jews wrote that in the Middle Ages to say "See look! We told you Jesus wasn't the Christ!"

carm.org/early-church-fathers-apocrypha

Those are fucking heretic false teachers. Any Christian who tells you that homosexuality is fine denies what it says on the Bible in at least 4 places.

Ancap flaggot btfo

Attached: B3E9EA0A-DB29-4AF9-A976-977F46A6C177.gif (326x253, 2.63M)

Lots of Catholic cope itt

Attached: 2987348927394234.jpg (3264x1835, 1.35M)

We don't hate people they are attracted to the same sex, but we warn them that doing gay sex acts is sinful, and encourage them to stop. I recommend that gay people become celibate.

Going by your logic the people in OP aren't Catholics, which, they aren't, and Catholics are the only Christians and are right.
The Catholic Church absolutely did produce/compile The Bible as any Trinitarian understands it no matter how much Protfagging you want to do.
I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of things you 'believe' that place you firmly outside of the realm of being a Christian anyway.
You probably don't even believe in The Real Presence, which Jesus himself talks about and mentions as essential.
Do you believe in Sola Scriptura? Because that's non-Biblical, it's actually only brought about via bastardized removals and complete, intentional mistranslations via Luther.
The Catholic faith IS the Biblical faith.

>NOOOO THE CHRISTIANS ARE LOVING AND ACCEPTING OTHERS NOOOO

Attached: soyjak.jpg (600x800, 52.73K)

In the 1960's "Vatican 2" happened, and the Catholic Church basically capitulated to the fucked up modern world and the Jew World Order. They also failed to condemn Communism which was on their original "agenda" for Vatican 2. They were subverted from within by (((certain people))). Today the only real Catholics are a few "conservatives" but mostly the "Traditional Catholics" which are becoming more numerous all the time. Traditional Catholics regularly have 8-12 kids, often white.

Wtf do you think posting shit like this proves? Obviously heretical, anti-Christian churches parading around with garb that give away their obvious non-Christian nature are obviously non-Christian.
What's next, you're going to tell me that the demon trannies reading children books aren't Christian or in line with Christian teaching?

Cool talking points

Attached: 1565846346763.jpg (1312x675, 195.56K)

I'm telling you that the Roman church is corrupt and liberal beyond correction

Attached: 1580023081006.png (1904x809, 776.99K)

As a cradle Orthodox Christian, those numbers for Orthodox Christians have got to be wrong. We're pretty anti-gay marriage, even in the progressive West.

>"Traditional Catholics" which are becoming more numerous all the time. Traditional Catholics regularly have 8-12 kids, often white.
Show me

Attached: ekubvmgwwaazlvi.png (703x534, 247.42K)

> I'm Christian, don't worry, I just choose to arbitrarily discard the entity and faith that literally was Christianity and defined what it was to be a Christian for 75% of history lmao, aren't I so special for being able to individually come up with everything, religion should just be whatever you read and think man

pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/

Attached: 1548967497866.jpg (1200x1187, 366.27K)

Cool strawman

Attached: augustine_gracealone.jpg (600x600, 58.04K)

shamelesspopery.com/does-saint-jerome-endorse-the-protestant-canon/
youtu.be/3Dc-TBqtyiI
bruh

It very well may be the case, but Church doctrine itself states that the Church is not entirely nor even primarily on earth and is far greater and is a spiritual communion of all those who share the faith and have partaken in the Sacrament of Christ's Body and Blood.
All of the bishops, the Pope, the churches, could be misguided and heretical and covered with faggot shit and it still wouldn't change the pathway to nor nature of salvation being aligning oneself with the teachings of Christ and His One True Church and partaking in its sacramental life.

Give me the tl;dr
all I'm meaning to illustrate is that the apocrypha as Canon was not unanimous opinion

Yep, that's cope

Attached: catholic soteriology.png (807x576, 430.22K)

It says almost half of Orthodox Christians don't believe in hell. Are people retarded?

Acknowledging the most awful and egregious example of abuse of trust does not require a suspension of adherence to morals.

>Catholics are the only real Christians
This is a statement, not an argument or proof
>I'd be willing to bet....
baseless assumption
>You probably.....
baseless assumption
>Sola scriptura is non-biblical
Salvation by faith alone is impossible to miss

Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
Acts 4:12|KJV|
And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
Acts 16:31|KJV|
Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began.
2 Timothy 1:9|KJV|
Truly my soul waiteth upon God:
from him cometh my salvation.
Psalm 62:1|KJV|
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Acts 2:21|KJV|
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10|KJV|

>no attempt at apologizing for all the catholics who accept faggotry

I think it's safe to say Catholics are done on Yas Forums

That's how they responded to the survey

Attached: 1480008825898.jpg (940x633, 254.39K)

If it's only faith, then why did Jesus tell people to repent, and why did Paul say to not sin?

You accuse me of strawmanning but you very obviously reject the teachings of the entity and faith that ARE the one source of Christianity for nearly all of its history.
> What about Orthodoxy
A faith extremely similar to Catholicism which does not consider Protestantism soul-saving and has sacraments and still descends via apostolic succession.
You also cite one line of Augustine and act as if that defines his entire beliefs. He most certainly did not argue for Sola Fides.
vivacatholic.wordpress.com/2007/12/08/augustine-on-faith-works-grace-and-eternal-life/
What would you tell St. Paul when he was explicitly listing off acts, i.e. works, that would by themselves ban you to hell even with faith?

Wow, what a terrifying justification of Catholic evil.

Something seems off to me to be honest.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (NIV):
Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a] 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

Sola Fides BTFO forever, acts alone can bar you from heaven.

You stupid nigger, I never justified what these priests who are pedophiles are doing. Your reading comprehension is close to nil, I am pretty much arguing that they aren't Catholic and their actions indicate they are heretical/possess no supernatural faith and/or are in a state of mortal sin.

Based.

Attached: jews and papists.jpg (624x294, 30.55K)

ye lad imma need to call cringe on this one. i remember once i visited a monastery on the countryside. i still remember the words that priest said to me: stay away from sex, and stay away from communism

Attached: 1567979074430.png (994x708, 1.29M)

Catholics desperately trying to change the subject as usual

Attached: 1.jpg (225x225, 9.08K)

Marital sex is a good thing
Good that you found an anti commie

Attached: 1549104579935.jpg (677x900, 91.21K)

The idiot who wrote that likely does not even know what "dark ages" really means.

K faggot, let's settle it then, do you believe in the Real Presence?
Also, none of those verses indicate faith being the ONLY thing required to save you, just that it is a necessary condition.
Why would Jesus and God give moral laws in the fucking first place if you could just go
> I believe tho
and still be saved?

Attached: support_for_gay_marriage_by_religion.png (350x478, 141.29K)

>no attempt at apologizing for all the catholics who accept faggotry
I have literally said that they aren't Catholics, are heretics, are you capable of reading? They won't be saved.

Are you actually asking or is this a rhetorical question?

Jerome had a tier system for what books he thought were canonical. I agree that opinions varied, in fact in the video it's stated that the Jews never had an agreed upon canon. The Septuagint is used because it's the version made closest to Jesus' birth. If you want to see the standardization over time, look at the Council of Rome, the Council of Hippo, the Council of Carthage, the Second Ecumenical Council of Nicaea, the Ecumenical Council of Florence, and the Ecumenical Council of Trent in that order.

How do Jews support gay marriage when it says twice in the Torah that it is bad? Reform Judaism makes no sense to me.

OHNONOONON AHHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

There's a reason Freemasons and Jews work so much harder to subvert Catholicism than any other religion...

So if you're reading apocryphal books, you're reading bullshit? Should they be read at all? This is confusing.

no such thing marriage is about god and family and nothing to do with governments or faggots

DEBUNKED!!

youtube.com/watch?v=u02sNHRNLCk

You should read them, they're just not inspired

Florence was not of the seven ecumenical
Trent was counter reformation

The Protestant argument is very simple. We can analyze all books and determine if they're Canon, it doesn't rest on any council's decree.

Attached: vatican_ususy_rothschild.png (1018x861, 916.12K)

I guess they interpret it as
>We think same-sex sex marriage should be legal in this country as a matter of secular law, but that doesn't mean we approve it in our religion
I guess they believe in secular SSM, but not religious Jewish SSM. Thing for thee not for me

So am I supposed think of them as "fan fiction" or something?

I'm not so sure. I saw several gay female rabbis on Twitter today.

Think of them as biblical genre books that give a picture of the religious mind of the time, but not authoritative

There is literally nothing wrong with allowing your fake state-sanctioned "marriages" between two people of the same sex. Catholics know those pieces of paper aren't real, and this is just an easier way to spot sodomites.

Attached: 132673139.jpg (192x187, 10.84K)

No, they are unironically pro gay.
Proof.

Attached: Views about homosexuality among Catholics.png (680x600, 60.33K)

they weren't apocrypha for 1500 years until Luter cut them out because they didnt fit into his wordview. and who are those people in your comic that supposedly wrote the Bible ?

Attached: 9f3148dbdad8eda46e892dcbc699736b7f6088364a3b77f83b12b1b008640e74.png (1778x330, 36.66K)

Peter, Paul, Luke, the author of Hebrews, John, Mark, Matthew, John of Patmos

>they weren't apocrypha for 1500 years
Hmm
Julius Africanus says the apocrypha book of Susanna is a forgery. "In your sacred discussion with Agnomon you referred to that prophecy of Daniel which is related of his youth. This at that time, as was meet, I accepted as genuine. Now, however, I cannot understand how it escaped you that this part of the book is spurious. For, in sooth, this section, although apart from this it is elegantly written, is plainly a more modern forgery. There are many proofs of this . . . But a more fatal objection is, that this section, along with the other two at the end of it, is not contained in the Daniel received among the Jews." (Julius Africanus, A Letter to Origen from Africanus About the History of Susanna)

Yes, they're human beings like you. They're committing sins, just like (you). Are you suggesting we becone sand-barbarians and bash their heads in with stones like Islam says to? Or shall we let God sort them out.