/circ/ circumcision general /cg/

Gospel of Luke chapter 2, which states in verse 21 that Jesus was circumcised eight days after his birth (traditionally January 1/New year because according to jewish trditions he got his name from god after he was circumcised)

Nope, he says that only castrated men(you) get in to hell.

>Jew, Arab, African, other assorted shitskin tradition
No thanks Shlomo

I hope there is a societal collapse so I can hunt fuckers like you down and put them out of their misery, you fucking kike puppet.

Attached: image0.jpg (343x376, 12.22K)

This is just a cope and you're in denial. Eventually you will realize that you're a victim of a disgusting barbaric practice that has managed to continue into the 20th & 21st centuries through social conditioning.

Good job, I am going to do it the same to my sons, exactly after they're born.

Sure jesus the JEW was cut but he says you shouldn't be UNLESS you arr a filthy jew

Vast majority of men in Romania aren't circumcised and do just fine, so get off your high horse

Circumcision is ugly

Attached: cutVSuncut.jpg (678x536, 61.15K)

>Concerning the first issue, New Testament Christians are no longer under the Old Testament Law, and circumcision is no longer required. This is brought out in a number of New Testament passages, among which are Acts 15; Galatians 2:1–3; 5:1–11; 6:11–16; 1 Corinthians 7:17–20; Colossians 2:8–12; and Philippians 3:1–3. As these passages proclaim, being delivered from our sins is the result of faith in Christ; it is Christ’s finished work on the cross that saves, not the observance of an external rite. Even the Law acknowledged that circumcision alone was insufficient to please God, who specified the need to “circumcise your hearts” (Deuteronomy 10:16; cf. Romans 2:29). In salvation, the works of the flesh accomplish nothing (see Galatians 2:16).

>In Acts 16:3, Paul had a missionary helper, Timothy, circumcised. Timothy was half-Jewish, and Paul circumcised him so that he would not be a hindrance as they sought to reach out to unsaved Jews. Although the Bible did not require Timothy to be circumcised, it was something he did willingly for the sake of reaching the Jews. However, as Paul states unequivocally in Galatians, circumcision does not aid either salvation or sanctification in Christ. Of course, the incident with Timothy does not directly apply today because Christians need not be circumcised in order to reach unbelievers, whether Jews or Gentiles. Once again, the principle of the circumcision of the heart is at the heart of the matter.
gotquestions.org/circumcision.html

my dick is keratinized and dry. there is little sensitivity. i hate it.