What are some Yas Forums approved philosophers?
Aristotle?
Aurelius?
Spengler?
Descartes?
Stirner?
What are some Yas Forums approved philosophers?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Jesus
Evola
>Don't be an asshole to people and stop being so Jewish
Eh yeah good points
Yas Forums is not a monlythical institution where everyone agrees on everything.
If you ask me, you shouldn't read the Stoics. Boring and they don't really add anything besides practical stuff for your daily life. Its okay if you are a meathead gymbro or a homosexual in the closet.
Read Schmitt above all. Again, just the opinion of some internet asshole, take it with a grain of salt.
FPBP
Karl Marx
Friedrich Engels
Leo Trotzki
Grigori Jefimowitsch Rasputin
>Rasputin
Did he write any books?
>philosophers
aka ancient boomers. None of you shitheads ever read the republic. It is literally boomer supermacy: the book.
Philosophy is the love of knowledge. Anyone whose knowledge flexes in the right way can be a philosopher (which, though rare and valuable, is still too common an aptitude relative to its market value to enable careerism in itself). The loyal slaves of hatred and lies found around here can't do it.
Sorry I meant Boomer supermacy wishful thinking: The book.
Marcus Aurelius
The Jew who hated Jews and drove Europe into decline... fuck off Germ barbarian
Jung, Evola, maybe Stirner. Christian Identity pastors, such as Bertrand Comparet, and Wesley Swift.
Read the Gita
Aristotle was Anti-Boomer tho. He emphasized on mentoring the young and passing knowledge and taking solace in helping them surpass you, not to hold them in disdain.
Being one upd by your pupil was considered a major accomplishment.
Plato.
Philosophy is the most cucked midwit study out there. It's literally outsourcing your thinking and opinions to other people. Reddit: the subject. Just make your own philosophy and divert your focus to more significant studies like Physics. It's not even interesting, it's vague posturing about nothing to no utilitarian ends.
>heh, pseud detected
Retard detected, learn something useful.
List of authors
Here's some authors
Read these guys
I won't explain why
Words take effort
some good recommendations here but I only know that because I've read them
nobody else is going to follow your shitty list unless you give reasons
also read teddy roosevelt
rothbard
Well from the OP it’s obvious that’s listing names primary subject, so I think you should promptly commit suicide.
nietzsche and hegel are the only philosophers still relevant in modernity. every philosopher after them is just aping or turning their insights toward something, usually toward destroying civilization. i don’t consider spengler or evola philosophers (though they are frequently philosophical) but they are extremely relevant for what they are.
Kierkegaard
Apparently they hate me for asking any questions. Just trying to test the validity of their assertions. In any sense that would be doing a person a favor.
It's a side study retard... the great minds of science often if not most of the time dabbled in philosophy.
ultimate midwit take
>to no utilitarian ends
you know utilitarianism is a branch of philosophy?
Jew detector pinging hard
yes there's only one kind of philosophy and every author listed in this thread falls into that category
evola and marx, they were like peas in a pod when it came to thinking!
you obviously haven't learned much from your reading. or maybe you've not read the books and just like to spout names...? hmm wonder why that would be. you know we're all anonymous here, right? you don't get board cred for knowing certain names
> reducing the LORD to a mere philosopher
philosophy is just the little brother of theology
Kant - Hegel - Heidegger
Blessed and Christpilled
They also dabbled in alchemy and theology you dumb cunt. Do you want to look for hidden meanings in the bible as well? Try to find the philosopher's stone?
>no u
What takes years of study for philosophers comes naturally to people with an IQ over 120. Stop wasting your time reading opinions for hundreds of hours. Philosophy is so fucking vague and pretentious, it has no value beyond teaching retards how to think.
Go to Venezuela or Cuba commie and stay there for 10 years
It's more relevant than ever.
Else you get retard generations who want communism after everythig that happened in 20th century.
It opens you to consider different views.
>Yas Forums approved
Philosophy does not work this way. It's not political ideology. Also, Yas Forums only pretends to read at best.
Additionally, I automatically assume everyone who obsesses over Aurelius is a confused teenage boy with daddy issues at this point.
Based. Peter Peters' talk "White Boy, There's Something You Ought to Know" was great.
The correct answer for Yas Forums is Confucius
Hitler
>They also dabbled in alchemy and theology you dumb cunt. Do you want to look for hidden meanings in the bible as well? Try to find the philosopher's stone?
Hre's your philosopher stone, and stone the builder refused, also know as Jesus
You must be 18 years old to post here
LOL
Philosophy is mostly just people disagreeing with previous thinking and writing about it. How is that telling people how to think?
Eastern philosophy is not real philosophy.
My problem with philosophy is that it has no basis in empiricism. It's an idealised model for how something should be without actually taking into account science, data and statistics. It's how you think something SHOULD be rather than how something is. Maybe life improvement philosophy can be useful in small amounts, but most of it is obvious shit that any relatively smart people would figure out; or just a waste of time.
>comes naturally
>vague and pretentious
Midwit cope.
Stefan Molyneux
Sargon
Because it's literally just opinions.
Philosopher:
>here's 400 pages of my autism. Let me tell you my opinions
this
ernst jünger - read der waldgang...its literally about dealing with clown world and npcs
>It's an idealised model for how something should be
It's an examination of life, what the hell are you talking about? Have you ever opened a philosophy book? Or are you just parroting click bait youtube videos?
After 1 year of philosophy in HS we got a short overview of thought throughout the ages so in essence you see how thought developed.
You also see long tradition of whole Western civilization.
He devoted himself especially to the study of natural science, and increased the naturalistic elements in Aristotle's thought to such an extent, that he denied the need for an active god to construct the universe, preferring to place the government of the universe in the unconscious force of nature alone.
You don't think there's any value in hearing different people's opinions?
If so, why should I care about YOUR opinion?
Sounds like a very very slow version of Yas Forums.
>I disagree with your shitpost and heres my reply 100 years later
Marcus Aurelius is unironically one of the most based philosophers of the Cynical school of thought. Entry level as fuck, but unabashedly based.
FPBP
Post after post and no mention of St. Thomas Aquinas. Pathetic.
>Cynical
Stoic you mean.
Thats the forbidden fruit retard. Jesus was that one jewish guy.
American posters truly are cringe
Brainlet take. The Republic was a satire. If you think Plato actually believed we should ban books and enforce birth control you're a pseud.
Philosophy was always taught to the elite.
Guess there is a reason.
Cicero
They are all shit the only philosophy you need is the philosophy of nature: what doesnt survive is removed from reality, what does survive gets to continue. Build your life around survival.