ITT: People guilty of destroying Western Culture
ITT: People guilty of destroying Western Culture
Noam Chomsky and his daughter.
jews
freemasons
leftists
Shit in my mouth Derick
In Africa they grind the bones of albinos for medicine.
Vladimir Lenin
Leon Trostsky
Woodrow Wilson
Lyndon Johnson
The Rothschild family
The Rockefeller family
Dont Forget Marx
1965..
The most recent example would be merkel and the entirety of EU
Is that eliazabeth warren without makeup
Lel
just say germans
The original globalist boomer who came up with this idea that a human is an end in itself and not a means to something else. This led to the idea that the only true value was human life, everything else was derived and secondary.
And that's how the current system was built, based on this idea that the Western system must be neutral to all values and must respect all cultures from around the world equally, no matter if they've achieved something or not. This is the door throught which moral relativism entered, as well as all forms of Marxism and anti-Western progressivism. All tracing their roots to Kant and the Enlightenment.
This middle eastern virgin
Kant
Not what he said at all.
This fucking asshole
By the way , everything you said about creeping moral relativism could much better be placed at Hegels feet, not Kant. But even then it was really just a bastardization of Hegels slave-master paradox by Marx. No surprise there
All implications of the categorical imperative. They all derive from it.
Jews and their enablers the Christians. Nero should have wiped both out when he had the chance.
Kant had actual and direct influence on legal thought. He is quoted in law books, both national an international ones. Hegel not so much, if at all. So Kantian thought is pretty much part of what defines the current system.
The categorical imperative was what he was most correct about - living a good ethical life without condition. Manifesting the best of what Christ taught in a philosophical sense is not a bad thing at all. It is humans fault for not living to that standard. At every level nowadays we live as apathetic retarded babies depending on the state for survival . If we lived the categorical imperative we would be better for it
The eternal kraut destroying Europe
In the XX century, (((the Frankfurt school))) without any doubt.
duchamps toilet was the start of western decline
...
Okay here's the thing, Yas Forums reactionaries: why do you all act like the death of Western culture is a bad thing?
I'm not going to bother repeating the usual Leftist/whatever critique of the West, other than to point you to the stuff on the uniquely shitty conceptions of human life embodied in Roman law and then passed down. Nor am I going to deny that Western culture has its good points. There's a unique and irreplaceable beauty in the Odyssey, Macbeth, the Goldberg variations, Rembrandt's self-portraits, the Laurentian Library, Spinoza's Ethics, coffeehouses, sandwiches.
But here's the thing: if you don't like our culture now, well, you don't like where all that ends up. Our current world is a product, chiefly, of Western culture. All the thinkers and artists you hate were created by Western culture, even if they were reacting against it. You cannot wind back the clock and get a different result. Every criticism you can levy against the contemporary world is a criticism of Western culture.
Whether by your standards or mine, it's a failed project. Let it die. Let us replace it with something better together.
He's projecting a lot, but people as ends in themselves is a central idea to Kant (one of the positive takeaways from his ideas imo) and there's the whole Perpetual Peace essay.
Categorical imperative is an idea so obviously drunk it turned me off Kant for *decades*... where Kant went wrong was equating the intrinsic and absolute value of persons with some universal reason and not in difference and specificity.
You cannot blame Kant for that. Kant could not imagine Angela Merkel allowing the free flow of millions of literal apes and middle easterners into Rhineland or whatever. You certainly cannot say he would think a English man (actual England) and a Congoese man are the same. That shouldn’t stop the English man from living to a universal objective sense of good will just because black eat bush meat and eat ass on rap videos
Actually what is "western culture"? Because Burger culture is definitely not European Western culture.
European Western culture has been fine, even with all the leftist crap thrown in there.
It's the Amerimutt Hollywood abomination, rap "music", gay rights (Stonewall etc), aggressive feminism from US universities, tranny rights, hippie 60s Californian culture (San Francisco, Woodstock degeneracy), McDonalds and so on. Without all this crap from across the Atlantic Western European culture would have been a-ok. We only got toxic poison from across the pond that gradually insinuated itself in our Euro culture too.
Moot's grandpa?
Kant was simply unaware of the consequences of his naive categorical imperative. He thought it would be applied only in his (European) culture. We ended up applying this principle in our entire legal system. We now treat nignogs based on this Kantian assumption that all humans are equally reasonable and worthy of respect.
It was me. I did it
max horkheimer, theodor adorno
Kinsey and Sigmund.
I agree with you here. Making Kant out to be some insane, pink haired, proto SJW marxist is wrong. He had noble intentions and Hegel and his TERRIBLE writing was the one to blame in my opinion. Bt Kant was right about much of his enlightenment ideas however. As much as I hate what blacks have done to my country, slavery is indefensible and he was trying to destroy that. But by showing that allowing lessers to co habitate we can show a need for self segregate for ourselves
True actually, Hamilton is more to blame but the Union was jewish poison from the beginning and anybody involved in it is a criminal against humanity
Whaaa? What the fuck are you on about? Where tf do you get the idea that I would be amenable to this kind of take?
All humans are worthy of respect because of their unique and incommensurable humanity. Bush meat has value, fish and chips has value, rap videos have value, English folk songs have value... and I'm sorry but who doesn't like eating ass?
Big eared faggot.
I want to go to a reddit meet up and beat the fuck out of everyone. I’m so tired of Those group thinking dumb fucks who think they’re so smart. They’re useful idiots. Nothing more.
You have no idea what you’re talking about, lol.
I agree that the categorical imperative is a shit construct
...globalist spotted. Very weak camouflage
This fat fuck
Boomers
>>all cultures are equal. Listen to me goy
what a cuck
Adorno was right about some things.
Can you back up the claim that all human beings have value? That's a very idealistic view of life that isn't backed up by anything other than idealism.
The only true answer, but let me add: Allen Ginsberg.
western culture is a lie
TARTARIANS built all our great cities, we owe them credit for all the magnificent buildings and streets of the old world
From it’s very inception western “culture” was meant to deceive you into accepting a self serving, demonic life filled with selfish desires and pleasure.
/thread
sage
I'm not trying to camouflage anything?
I wouldn't call myself a "globalist" and I don't think anyone does, but I'm an anarchist and a communist and I think nationstates are toxic social forms, that increased connection between different groups is a good thing, that people have equal worth regardless of where they come from, and that it's possible to build and recognize affinities and create solidarity across difference, and that there is a practical and a moral imperative for people to do so.
Nothing in my post contradicts or obscures that. It's an argument from that position to you reactionaries that your worldview is untenable: if what we have now is bad – and we both agree it is, however our accounts of why differ – then what gave rise to it necessarily must be.
Jesus Christ, Yas Forums reading about philosophy on this board always makes me realize how little actual understanding there is here.
Listen up, Jack, here is the categorical imperative for dummies: "What if everyone acted this way?"
Destroying your nation with third world mass immigration, allowing your nation states to be abolished by a globalist cabal and letting them lorded over by a) Jews or b) a state within the state or c) both as today all go very obviously against the categorical imperative. As does all of Marxism who has as its foundatonal morality that the end justifies the means. The red terror in the name of the glorious revolution derives from that where the categorical imperative implicitly prohibits it.
Kant was a Christian man and your autistic hatred for the enlightenment just reveals your ignorance.
This actually.
Kant literally saved the white race.
Warhol was based
How so??
what style
This fat bastard
Based.