Was he in the wrong?

Because back then there were no Orks in Europe anymore, only filthy Juden like you taking everything over.

They may be sandniggers, but killing unarmed people cowering in front of you is nigger-tier itself. Was in Afghanistan myself as a 12B combat engineer and can tell you firsthand that the brits and australians are the definition of shitty soldiers. No exposure to anything remotely resembling real violence in their home countries, so when they get to the sandbox they think they're billy badass for shooting at kids and stuff. US soldiers used to do that but stopped about a decade ago because even though the killing of civilians gets covered up, you still get punished for it. Poles were actually some of the only good soldiers I met.

Also, the brits got a fuckload of their dudes killed because they wanted to let a prince fly helicopters. That would've been hilarious except we had to clean up their mess.

It's murder. Is murder based?

Zog tier. Australians are the second biggest zog bots behind Amerimutts.
Imagine invading a nation that did nothing wrong and was framed by Israelis for 9/11 and murdering unarmed cowering villagers.
Sounds awfully Jewish to me.

fucking jew
why are you fucking digusting jews everywhere?

Norf Red Coats ate Muslims
simple as

Foreign soldier kills an unarmed man minding his own business in his own country.

> Was he wrong?

I personally give 0 shits, but yea, according to the rules you're not supposed to do that.

>blowing up Americans soldiers with bombs during war
>"oh no, I've been caught! Hold on, time-out guys!"

Attached: 15789427839471947197891.jpg (600x426, 62.5K)

No.
We do it all the time
You know what it's called?
Wednesday