>white americans are so productive compared to non-white racial groups that you could literally run a budget surplus and retain the ABSOLUTE military spending AND social security usage if you deleted all other racial groups and shrunk the economy proportionally >gigantic fiscal surplus, non-whites are massive drains on the economy >asians are a net-positive on the economy but even if you deleted their budget contribution whites still run a surplus >only reason you can't run budget surpluses anymore is because niggers and mexicans eat up the entire surplus and more >30% higher working class wages >cost of housing and property sliced by 30% >violent crime rates would plummet by about 90% in cities and 75% on average in rural areas >social security usage would plummet >literally utopia
i don't know.. he makes pro-white science videos about economics, genetics and sociology. they tried to shut him down several times but his videos "technically" don't constitute hate speech.
Kayden Edwards
Dawson or someone else?
Sebastian Moore
Nothing. Ryan has done nothing but contribute to the white cause.
Juan Allen
Ryan Faulks aka Alternative Hypothesis
Adam Garcia
It's more to do with the fact he uses this gay font and has that shitty intro. He was better using the 3 arrow sign. Now he just looks like a fag.
It makes me sad. What we could have had. Slavery was the biggest mistake in our history. We should have picked our own damn cotton.
Grayson Young
We had this and the whites America picked cheap labor and materials over a racial ethno state
William Rivera
He's a civnat though.
Dylan Ramirez
Ryan Faulk single-handedly won the hereditarian debate in the online public space. Even a lot of normies and smarter leftists now know hereditarianism is true.
The real question is, when is Ryan Faulk going to do for Holocaust revisionism what he did for hereditarianism? Should he even try, or is it a suicide mission/dead end?
Him going civ nat was like a visceral response to whites generally far and away aiding in their own destruction, and the fact that he doesn't hold animosity towards people of other races who act and think like him. From memory at least. None of this really refutes any of his articles and work, outside of his idea that white nationalism was just sitting underneath the surface of every white person waiting for a trigger
Angel Evans
The Holohoax has already largely been destroyed by actual objective revisionist historians such as Carlo Mattogno, but i think it would be a losing battle in the public space because of the enormity of the Holocaust industry and the power leverage that international Jewry has over the Holocaust question.
Would he objectively win on a factual basis though? Absolutely, if he did his research and read up on it. But he would be insta-banned from Youtube.
David Diaz
>Ryan Faulk single-handedly won the hereditarian debate in the online public space. Ridiculous. Besides, the debate is still going on, even though it should have been done decades ago.
Kevin Bell
He should move onto undermining the transgender industry in medicine. There's more than enough people and evidence to suggest something is going wrong there
Luis Sullivan
Shut the fuck up retard, stop posting here
Asher Sullivan
No matter what comes out about the Holocaust people will still say it was bad because a lot of innocent Jews were put into camps.
I mean if whites get put into camps I don’t think you would enjoy that.
Oliver Edwards
Nothing, he’s a king
>oh use the symbols and fonts I like! Fuck off you whiny, retarded little bitch
Jaxson Moore
Hereditarianism was also losing battle in the public space before AltHype made the topic accessible to a key audience.
Nobody has done that for Revisionism, and the YouTube ban definitely makes it harder. I would give money for his efforts to build as solid a case for this topic as he did for hereditarianism, even on an alternative platform/smaller audience.
But yes it would be a much, much harder fight than hereditarianism for the reasons you stated. The opposition would be much stronger.
Aiden Brown
I've read some of his articles(never watched a video though) and he seems smart enough, which is why the civnat reveal was so suprising.
Jeremiah Lopez
Based post, and ugly reality. Why did jews destory there best and most productive work horse i wonder?
Envy is an ugly thing.
Brayden Young
This is why our enemies support Whites taking in unlimited subhumans, your quality of life is directly correlated with the people you surround yourself with.
Matthew Harris
Yes this is an exaggeration, but key audiences have been exposed to his content and his content has clearly changed the debate on the YouTube-sphere.
Isaac Collins
I have a feeling the guy who made this Youtube video was going to come to the same conclusion regardless of what the data was.
Josiah Watson
>Hereditarianism was also losing battle in the public space before AltHype made the topic accessible to a key audience. Althype did not change anything. Stop it already.
Brandon Hall
Ok samefag. I never disliked his content, but you have to admit his choice of font is abysmal. The Art Deco font is a grotesque one, on par with the like of Comic Sans. I believe he should have chosen a font in the likes of Old English Text or Playbill. You cannot refute me on his.
My interpretation is he's more of a pragmatist, and acting as a civnat is a way that accomplishes 75% of your goals and gives you a chance of still wielding political influence in polite society.
Joshua Perez
He was a civnat because he is a fag literally. He was pro white ethno state and yet his life style would not even be aloud. But most alt right E celebs are gay
Austin Long
The guy is weaponized autism personified. He introduced an old video by doing a little dance while sitting shirtless. Absolutely autistic and absolutely logical
Gavin Anderson
The reason he won so easily is because the evidence is just so overwhelming. When he started all those years ago this was not the case yet, but as genetics advanced it became undeniable. The ground work needs to be done for the argument to be won.
Jack Allen
He’s an atheist literal faggot but other than that he’s completely based and has the best content on YouTube bar none.
Charles Baker
So basically Europe before the Kalergiites fucked it up
Liam Diaz
bitchute.com/video/yx5lABaziSM/ This video if you're interested at all has the reasons why he did it straight from the horses mouth
James Long
No he’s not retard.
Adam Reyes
So your only complaint is some fucking font in a video? Lmfao what a looser.
Grayson Torres
>The real question is, when is Ryan Faulk going to do for Holocaust revisionism what he did for hereditarianism? Should he even try, or is it a suicide mission/dead end? supposedly he did it in the past but eventually ended up changing his mind.
Lucas Hughes
What key audiences? His videos typically have less than 30k views. I've personally followed the IQ debate for years and the only time I've ever heard of Alt-hype is on pol.
Henry Murphy
he explicitly isn't
Charles Gray
Not samefag bruv
Carson Roberts
He is signalling we are in another Gilded Age
Daniel Harris
>Ryan Faulk going to do for Holocaust revisionism what he did for hereditarianism? No. He’s peak optics mode on this subject for better or worse.
Cameron Young
What a faggot. Shouldn't you be a some s o y latte slam poetry session.
Oliver Smith
Yes, it is. You may not see it as a big issue, but to someone who focuses on all details, it is a vital one. Presentation is key.
Alexander King
It's funny it's just the jews that keeps talking about it and nobody else. Truly makes you think
not really. most of his stuff is statistical inference based on decades old studies and surveys of professionals. unless research is repressed, in the next 10 or 20 years we will have damning molecular genetic evidence one way or the other (99.9% likely in Alt-Hype's favor) and every radical egalitarian will have egg on their face
Noah Myers
Honestly we should talk about all genocides. But it’s sad that we only focus on the holocaust because of reasons
Owen Peterson
Civicnationalism is not pragmatic though. The ideology has no future in America, and probably not anywhere else.
Yes he is.
Parker Edwards
an ethnostate isn't necessarily a right-wing macho no homo-allowed state. even Ernst Rohm was relatively open about his proclivities (and no, that wasn't why he was killed)
Jeremiah Evans
I once posted ryan to prove the superiority of north-western europeans and all i got was seethe and butthurt from slavs and dagos
Lucas Brooks
Hmm maybe, but he could have kept the 3 arrows. There was nothing wrong with that. Seethe more. This is clearly too much for your pitiful mind to comprehend.
People who think he's afraid to run against the grain haven't been paying attention
Dylan Collins
To have a fully functioning ethno state you need to focus on the family. And fags only harm that. You can have closet fags but open is a slippery slope. Just look at gays voting patterns, it’s dangerous
Nathaniel Hughes
Yeah, just capitulate to a blood libel that is constantly evoked to dismiss dissident right-wing views. "Just ignore it", what a great strategy. It's worked so well hasn't it?
How about we just advocate for the truth and don't listen to defeatists like you that are OK with letting a destructive lie continue to exist and manipulate public perception of right-wing politics.
Justin Scott
and here's me reading between the lines >anti race denial, anti unscientific racism, open to all who embrace the european revolution (which is really only whites and some east asian populations anyway) Ryan has good optics is all I'm saying
Jayden Morales
IQ is clearly genetic and heritable, there is no need for more studies if you want to prove that.
Parker Price
>when will he do all my thinking for me Hereditarianism is defended by him because it is scientifically accurate yet inexplicably denied. The Holocaust actually has extensive evidence and far better read people online debate this shit
Joshua Scott
Faggot nigger.
Ryan Taylor
I don’t care for Ryan but he is correct. That fag tranny and shit rat lost that debate
Mason Hill
Yeah, idiots like you were also saying "there is extensive evidence that IQ differences are driven by environment" back when. There is NOT extensive evidence of the Holocaust, just like all that supposed evidence for genetic equality was just phantom-evidence that disappeared when it was actually engaged in debate.
Jayden Lopez
The niggers didnt even do that, the Irish did and they did a shit job so we got the chinks to do it.
Alexander Foster
Anti-racist means he opposes racism against whites. Also Nazis are stupid.
Nathan Wilson
He explicitly states that first worldism is most common to Anglo-Saxons but is found in varying frequencies in all populations
Aiden Parker
But there never has been. Environmentalism was always weak
Ethan Gonzalez
"no"
Justin Robinson
He’s not going to debunk the Holocaust. He’s said multiple times the best way to go after Jews is to criticize the Jewish institutions like media, banking etc.
Ayden Martinez
But the Holohoax is scientifically inaccurate yet inexplicably undenied.
Levi Ramirez
He's unironically a faggot kike with a transparent agenda to anyone with an IQ in the triple digits. You've all been duped - not that you had a dogshit's chance of changing much of anything.
Daniel Hughes
This should be a regular thread. phonefagging but the potential to show real facts and numbers to back it up would give us good redpills to being back segregation
The issue with the holocaust is that they inflate the numbers. Jews did get put into camps and that should scare anyone if government can do that
Luis Long
ah yes, all of his videos for the past decade have been an attempt to further the fag agenda
Juan Fisher
I like this sperg
Oliver Martinez
You know who else criticized Jewish influence in the media and banking? Hitler. You know what Hitler did? The Holocaust.
So since the Holocaust is clearly a terminal impact of your analysis on Jewish influence in culture & politics, all your analysis should be immediately dismissed as being the initial stage of a genocidal sequence of events. See how easy that is?
Anybody who thinks that mainstream critique of Jewish influence in culture can possibly exist without correcting the record on the Holocaust is completely delusional. Accepting that the lie is going to persist forever and shouldn't be resisted is defeatist and subversive.