Technology causes globalization, which globalizes selection pressure.
A state justifies its existence minimizing selection pressure acting on an individual by creating surplus through group administratively increased efficiency.
As old nation states are incapable of answering global selection pressure, global capitalists even make a living out of responding to globalizing selection pressure, filling in holes the state's can't, making money. Thesevpeople aren't necessarily interested in a global governance, in fact they are rather not. They only lended a helping hand overspanning the globe, they don't build states.
2 scenarios I think of, right now: 1. A capitalistically organized quasi global state, offering administrative services making use of group efficiency, inside the current but continuingly eroding global state structure. 2. Via UN or something similar disruptively establishing a global governance.
1. Is what I am working on, it might help in the second case, too.
Blake Harris
>As old nation states are incapable of answering global selection pressure
they are just watch Chyna.
Its funny how liberals like you can never perceive that the liberal globo homo gay plex world some day might end. No. Its always more liberalism and more of the same.Its a perpetual path towards more globo homo gay plex.
my take:
Authoritarianism;Nationalism and centering around one owns race,civilisation and religion will take place.
black snake moan, is about a crazy slut and an grump old divorced man
Jace Edwards
the grifter
Jace Campbell
she was hot as a loli in adams family and she became even hotter when she got huge natural tits as a teen but when she got breast reduction surgery I completely lost all interest in her.
Why do women butcher their own bodies to make themselves uglier?
Jace Hall
black snake moan
Jackson Martin
>Technology causes globalization Only for countries that are small enough that they can't generate all of their technology/industry themselves. A Pan-European confederation that has trade between it's member states, but engages in autarky by not trading with other states on anything except design/information exchanges on occasion, has zero of the issues you're talking about. The problems with globalization are primarily third world sweat shops, which can't exist in the West.
Kayden Evans
is coffee good for you
Tyler Hill
The state reduces natural selection pressure, which leaves you with a new environment of reduced selection pressure. An entity that manages to administrate globally will cause pressure on any other.
Pretty much. Please corona Chan, end this nightmare
Elijah Bailey
You saw that webm and thought it'd be something classy and intellectual, you dumb fuck?
Jose Butler
>flag checks out
Gabriel Rivera
>two wolves fuck that shit is cringe
Gavin Sanders
>Why do women butcher their own bodies to make themselves uglier? women having sex without conceiving makes them hate themselves and wish to no longer be female
Colton Barnes
> India on day 10 of quarantine is slowly getting mad
Logan Rivera
There will be no global state, the internet, the main force behind globalization right now, will cause a political balkanization as nation states will lose support of its population, because of political polarization, thousands of small nation states will emerge and new political systems will be developed. Information technology is changing every part of human life, we already have a economic system on the internet called Bitcoin, as nation states lose tax revenues it is only a matter a time until a new political system is developed on the internet to replace traditional political systems.
Ian Johnson
A capitalist organization that is modelled after a conventional state might bring the most smooth transition into a global governance as incompetent governments can outsource there. Of course it will be a new model and it will administer groups, perhaps ranging from gangs to other groups that might constitute as a nation.
Of course there will be some kind of state.
Kayden Myers
Is coffee good for you?
Evan Reed
>The state reduces natural selection pressure No, a Liberal-Democratic state reduces natural selection pressure. A Community state reduces natural selection pressure. But not all states are liberal-democratic or communistic, because they aren't all run by internationalist jews.
James Cruz
What purpose has a state if not reducing selection pressure on the individual? Failed states brag with increasing selection pressure to make up for it.
Minimizing selection pressure in reverse, split formulation is: Increased... chances of survival comfort freedom
Thomas Martinez
You want to band so everyone has less profit? Ahaha...
Brayden Wright
Yes, but there will be many states, there will be a push towards free movement across borders, making an internet based state more likely as borders wouldn't matter anymore. Bitcoin is a global system, you can send money anywhere in the globe, it is as if borders didn't exist. A government based on the internet would be the same, but on a political level.
Austin Brown
The movie literally has nothing to do with racemixing. Don't judge a book by its cover
The most feasible way is a company acting like a state, circumventing state competition.
Jackson Butler
>What purpose has a state if not reducing selection pressure on the individual? To express the selection pressure of the group in the face of other groups, and ensure that a minimum level of conduct is agreed to upon by individual members so the 'selection pressures' don't degenerate into dysgenics.
>Failed states brag with increasing selection pressure to make up for it. Yes, Liberal-Democratic states and Communist states are shit, yes.
You sound like an AnCap.
Oliver Bailey
>must win must win what exactly?
Jaxon Davis
>To express the selection pressure of the group in the face of other groups, That is the result of inner reduced selection pressure, you outcompete outer groups. That is reduced selection pressure. There is no other justification for a state.
And now you even agree, wtf... >Yes... (states that don't reduce selection pressure)... are shit, yes
Oliver Rogers
Competition as a state. The most efficient inner altruistic group survives best.
Joseph Harris
>global has more potential > inner altruistic group
spoken like a true jew
Asher Price
1. Group administratively (higher efficiency) created surplus is how the state minimizes selection pressure. The more skills, the better. 2. Group Selection
Jackson Sanchez
It won't be one, It will probably be one state dominating like 50 to 60% of the world and the rest divided among thousands of smaller states. >> most feasible way is a company acting like a state That's right, it will be various companies acting like states, but these companies will span the whole world, they will not have a defined territory, they will basically be fluctuating above cyberspace and, competing for taxpayers.
Well that is ultimately one primary, supreme state. The rest is correct. I am developing a platform for exactly that.
Nathan Sanchez
Free bumps. Engage in the conversation.
Christopher Murphy
>And now you even agree, wtf... Literally 2 posts ago I said the exact same thing. You're not paying attention.
>That is the result of inner reduced selection pressure, you outcompete outer groups. That is reduced selection pressure. No. That is group evolutionary strategy. e.g you may not have kids, but your brother who shares all of your genes has kids, so you die for them, therefore the next closest thing to you spreading your genes occurs. Ironically, this increases selection pressure due to the decreased pool. Something that Can reduce selection pressure, can actually increase selection pressure, or do neither. You're making blanket, arbitrary statements that aren't necessarily true.
Leo Edwards
Here it is: (you)
Chase Howard
I wouldn't say it is one supreme state, it will be a new form of state though, perhaps a new type of civilization?
Jeremiah Myers
Except she fucks black dudes while her BF is away at war you faggot.
Sebastian Collins
>I am developing a platform for exactly that. How are you doing that? Thats what ive been thinking about too, can you share some of the ideas you have about how we go about doing that?
Connor Ramirez
Direct Brain to Computer Interfaces and User Interfaces based on cognitive models will be crucial.
