What does this have to do with billionaires having to risk and the "too big to fail" model being inherently anti-capitalist?
He's not wrong tho
Brayden Howard
Jose Nelson
>Company lose money
>Gets bailout
>Uses bailout to buy its stock back
So explain how this is a better solution?
Michael Carter
Adrenochrome isnt cheap.
Nothing personal kid.
Jayden Gutierrez
having no risk **
Carson Sullivan
Normies don't understand that the US economy is a giant ponzi scheme. All the "trillions" that exist in the financial economy are part of a big shell game, phantom money on which only a small portion is actually tapped to fund real world investment. The problem here is that when the shell game stops, the flow of capital into the real economy also stops, so unless we want to rip the bandaid off we need to keep the money circus going at full gait.
Joseph Harris
>rich pay tax
Kek
They don't pay shit on wealth you fucking clown
Nathaniel Morales
privatize profits, nationalize losses
t. semite
Parker Cox
It works kinda like this, if you don't bail out business that are failing during a crisis like this the workers are put out a job and become a problem. Go ahead and let everyone fold and start picking through the rubble. In the end this would allow the potential for a less corrupt system to form so it could be a better option. Who is going to knowingly press the dynamite on a large chunk of their economy and citizens livelihood? The reason its better to maintain the status quo and not disrupt the masses lives causing instability.
Austin Cox
So they don’t pay capital gains and dividend tax then or did I just imagine that?
Chase Phillips
Sounds like someone does not know the difference between a LLC and an individual. Actual retards they are.