Alan "put" Greenspan is a goldbug, oddly enough.
Are lolbertarians fine with slavery?
Anthony Nelson
Luis Roberts
Come on, let's use your brain.
>nobody will enforce the contract
That's not correct. Bad actors will get punished by being denied new contracts and be restricted with who they can deal with. If you owe your bank money and refuse to pay back, you're going to be blacklisted by other banks. There's also violence for cases that need it -- say someone who fails to pay rent (violated contract) who then gets removed by force from the property. There's absolutely both implicit and explicit enforcement of contracts.
>people won't break it though
They won't break it if they don't want consequences.
>it's the honor system
Unironically, yes. And tracked. And enforced.
Mason Torres
The nuance you're missing is that he thinks it's useful some times and a drag other times. As with everything, shit changes. But in general all bankers want gold to be special. They want to ride the full credit cycle.
Jack Peterson
The NAP only applies if there is no contract. You absolute brainlet.
William Mitchell
Cringe.
Easton Sanchez
One is about freedumb, the other is about kike taking your taxes to fund tranny story hour in the local lieberry.
Logan Harris
slavery violates the NAP
semantics
Xavier Cruz
>voluntarily
>slavery
dictionary.com
Jordan Richardson
No slavery does not violate the NAP. Slavery is a result of failing to fulfill their contract,(s) and thus they are the person violating the NAP. Forcing someone to fulfill their contract isn't the first action, thus it is not aggression.
Joseph Wilson
People sold themselves into slaver voluntarily for hundreds of thousands of years.