Herd causalities

Estimated cattle to be sacrificed in the name of Jewish economy.

>Herd immunity threshold
29-74%

>Mortality rate
0.5-10%

>Estimated slaughtered (best and worse case scenario) of any population that follows the herd strategy
0.145%-7.4%

Americans slaughtered:
>Lower limit
475 thousand
>Upper limit
24 million

Attached: 1585066609632.png (1026x598, 564.09K)

Other urls found in this thread:

statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>1 post by this id
Think before you post. OP is a soulless chink bugman shill with small penis and smooth brain. Parents so shame.

Or, the quarantine signals that the health care industry has become so bloated with beurucracy that it can't even preprare for the seasonal flu, and needs the be nationalized.

The purpose the the quarantine was to flaten the curve and prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed by the sick.

The quarantine will only slow the spread not prevent infections or save lives.

Attached: 1584843661748_shared.jpg (745x578, 93.92K)

Guys, don't bully this user. He has mental problems.

and I'm referring to not OP

shut the fuck up faggot. the virus is literally just the flu and shutting down the world for it is a massive over reaction.

Confucius took your soul and Xi Jinping is a faggot.

Bitch, my dad is from Hong Kong. We hate China.

Stupid Italy, they don't know yet this is just a big empty bun and those people would've died from the common flu anyways. Pasta niggers BTFO

LMAO. Americans are part of the cuck cattle herd. Enjoy it mutts, I'll be comfy watching from home

Imagine believing this
Imagine staying home to save all those boomers who are the only thing that keeps jewish politicians in power still

kek, well you are posting in a Chinese slide thread.

BUMP

Tu come cachorro?

oh for fuck sakes

when he says he will defy doctors please skip the media and actually directly watch his speech

the doctors would shut down everything in the world for 2 years. everything. all of civilization would collapse and more people would die of that then this virus.

thats what he is talking about

CONTEXT CONTEXT
the media always takes trump out of context

anytime the media says "trump said x" watch the actual speech direct from the white house youtube channel. and realize that what he actually said was something different in its proper context.

Math checks out
Avg estimate is 5% death rate if you consider current deaths vs the # of cases 14 days ago
So avg estimate is 12 million Americans die

This is why Brazil will never be a developed country.

Attached: 1585066680894.png (749x406, 5.36K)

>mortality 0.5 - 10%
Fuck off mongoloid. The death rate isn't even 10% in countries like Italy. They suspect there are 10x more infected than they know, so the death rate is low as fuck. Anyone who still falls for the 10% death rate bullshit needs a brain transplant.

I watched it
Did you see the part where he was talking about filling press seats?
I legit thought he was having a stroke

>Americans slaughtered:
>Lower limit
>475 thousand
>Upper limit
>24 million
that's so fucking retarded lol, the no-action alternative in the most oft-cited study and prospectus has worst case scenario death toll in the United States at 2.4 million if literally zero preventative actions are taken. Not 24 million. learn to read faggot.

Well then I guess we better give up our freedoms and any wealth we have to protect the future for boomers amiright?

If it wasn't for boomers what would even have?

It will be 10% (or more) when hospitals are full.

20% when hospitals are full

the worst case scenario study assumes death rate will stay constant. I put all the math on display, if you have any problem with it, don't pick on the results.

The united states has 1.5 million hospital beds. That is 0.5% of their population. Around 10% of known cases require hospitalisation, so if there are 10 times more cases than are known, that would be 1% and the system would be 2x overcapacity from COVID-19 cases alone for months.

Only 20% of the infected in the Netherlands even go to the hospital. If 20% die, it will be only because Americans are more obese and unhealthy.

Bye bye amerifats

Attached: 1584561518692.jpg (1080x1385, 241.15K)

tests give false positives, once they change the testing to accurate ones virus goes back to being little worse seasonal flu.

There are ~150 million too many in the US, this pussy virus isn't worth worrying about

Why are you so convinced it is 'just a flu'? This seems like nothing but major denial that anything could actually go wrong.

500% when hospitals are full.

based Trump putting the wagies back in their cageys so they can get back to paying taxes to support neets like me.

there's no treatment, hospitals don't help anyways

Because inadequate testing makes people think that 10x as many people are dying. But only testing hospitalized people showing symptoms, when the disease is known to mostly be carried by people who are asymptomatic is another issue.

Everyone under 25 should go back to business for 2 weeks. Then everyone over 30, 2 weeks after. 2 Weeks later 35, etc. This current pattern is just going to have us locked inside because diabetic, smoker, overweight people with asthma hooked up to a ventilator might die! Pfft...just as likely to die from their unhealthy rations at this point.

Get a load of this guy. Then even managed to save a 95 year old grandma in Italy. Many people survive when put in the hospital. Many don't even have to go there in the first place..

statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
It's a shame that this is all just the biggest case of mass delusion ever recorded.

Face it: Everyone not making at least a billion per year is expendable.

How much longer do you think people will be placated by this garbage? Just admit that (((you))) have no plans, nothing but mid 50's understanding of medicine and (((your))) pockets are empty and everything will be better in the long run. Speak the words your (((father))) and (((mother))) forbade: we were wrong we're sorry.

More people will die of the virus long term in a herd immunity scenario though.

You have two bad options. One ends in the elites having less power over the long run, and one ends in the elites having less power in the short term.

Guess which one the elites are going with.

>Spend precious resources saving 95 year old man.
>He dies 3 months later to completely unrelated illness and perhaps a bit by the strain all of this shit has put on his body

Live. Laugh. Love. Life is a precious gift and we should all hang on until we're 148 years old, hooked to ventilators and placed in virtual reality holograms.

As I said here: even if the values are an order of magnitude out, there will be no hospitals for any purpose. Even two orders of magnitude out will be a huge problem.

Yes. You dont want to give up your jew fiat wealth fantasy. Back to work slave!

Oh god 300 million deaths incoming

>One ends in the elites having less power over the long run, and one ends in the elites having less power in the short term.
Can you elaborate on this please? You're being quite vague.

Aka, the virus is overhyped as fuck and is being used for different reasons.

So?

What's the point in delaying this endlessly. Pretty sure the method that I said is pretty good because the low hospitalization of people under 35 without pre-existing conditions is very low.

Some articles cherry picking specific cases isn't really helping.

if you multiply the number of confirmed cases in Italy by 10, you'd still have a 0.9% mortality rate, my lowest estimate leaves it at 0.5% to appease people like you, and even that results in over 400k dead Americans.

Killing millions of people, anyone who needs hospital treatment of any kind this year, is not a very good idea.

How would this kill millions of people?

So .2% of the infected at age rates below 35 die, right? This is of known infections, so the actual rate could quite possibly be as low as .002%.

That's 2 out of every 100,000 people would die. Better yet, telling people with pre-existing conditions to stay home would probably eliminate those 2 people.

A massive outbreak disrupts things temporarily. Forcing the economy to close up shop and forcing countries become more self sufficient would lessen the power of finance in the long run.

Because there would be no hospital services, as I said. Anything that would be survivable with hospitalisation would become a death.

Retards dont think about what happens when there aren't any beds in the ICU and someone needs to go in for cancer or a car crash

>Retards dont think about what happens when there aren't any beds in the ICU and someone needs to go in for cancer or a car crash
yes indeed, such as those who think it's a moral and economic imperative to bring in large size cities of incompatible immigrants, a phenomena that began much before the last six weeks

>1 post by this ID
>is himself the first reply
Are you fucking retarded? Did you just say things you see others say without understanding anything about how they work?

Why would there be no hospital services? .005% of the 18-35 demographic might need be hospitalized. That's 5 out of every 100,000 people. For 2 weeks. Oh god, the horror!?

~3200-4200 people hospitalized. OH GOD. WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!!!

Why would a healthy person under 35 generally need to be hospitalized unless it's a workplace related injury or car accident? Just tell people to stay safe for 2 weeks, lol.

If you're dumb enough to go skateboarding, that's on you.

i believe the thinks 1 post is a "you will not talk anymore"
typical chink logic

>Why would there be no hospital services?
it's the big, spooky talking point they heard on CNN and pass off like it's their own insight
that, or some vague threat about how 6666 trillion will die if desk jockeys don't get 6-18 months paid time off

If they Die they Die

Back to work will be the death of capitalism in the US
Support will drop to 0.0x% and the rich will be

There are currently over 3000 hospitalised with COVID-19 in Italy. A country with severe quarantines in places for several weeks, and 1/5 of the population of the USA. '3200-4200 people' is clearly completely wrong.

>IRG4Y
how fucking fitting you god damned kikebot. if your the first post of course there is only one post by the OP

Kkkkkkkkkkkkkllllllkkkkkkkkkkkklllllkkkkkkkkkkooookkkllllllkkkkkkkkk

Our fuckhole government is following herd immunity too. Oldies - 70 and over or those with wealth - get to sit it out. The rest of us play Russian roulette.

How many of them are over 35 with pre-existing health conditions? Isolate those cases, and figure out what percentage of young, healthy people are likely to be hospitalized. Not my fault your math is ignorant.

.5 %- 10% wew bruh that range

Attached: 1F0E267F-CDBD-4F4D-960A-2F2EA39884A9.jpg (487x229, 28.25K)

As soon as they leave their apartments for the next couple of years, they'll die, so I'd rather be us than them.

everyone who's obese or has diabetes, for one.

I'm very curious as to the claims made by doctors. In my country they claim we can't follow the Chinese 6 week eradication plan, as we would simply be redinfected when we open our borders. Yet none of the media ever presses them on why we would not just keep our borders closed for 18 months. Literally Australia, the U.S. or Canada, for example, have any reason to need their borders open tO massive amounts of human traffic. It makes no sense.

No-one knows what the figure would be, as Italy has stopped people going outside since near the start of this month. I don't know how you expect to completely isolate the under 35s working from everyone else.

In our country, thus far, I believe only a very tiny fraction have required hospitalization. They ARE hospitalized regardless because we have the room, for now, but I think they said most of them could be recovering at home with oxygen and medication. Also lots of distrust about them following isolation orders.