Is Redwall redpilled?
Is Redwall redpilled?
>Certain species are innately constructive and peaceable
>Others are innately savage and destructive
>Hardship and adversity must be overcome with community, friendship, and a heaping truckload of righteous violence
Brian Jacques is sorely missed.
Anything from Jaques is based
Yes.
my great aunt secured me an advance copy of taggerung with some sick cover art, best gift i ever got as a kid
Yes, though the original Redwall may as well be a book from a different series since it changed so much. Love the feel of the world Jaques created. It's like action Wind in the Willows.
The violence and malevolence portrayed in these books will never make into any film production. They always try to make them PG when they should be PG-13 minimum and preferably R.
Or the idealism and heroism, which would "not be suitable for younger viewers" because they would be exposed to a very clear White and Black morality, like real life.
Can you recommend an ereader brand or even better, model? I still only read physical books, and I'm in the dark
Redwall is excellent children's literature, and teaches excellent lessons and hard truths in a harmless but engrossing world. I would also recommend Watership Down to anybody here.
Not really. I just use my wifes old samsung phone with no sim card in it. Really any tablet will do. For software I use Aldiko
Also, the vegetarian food-porn appearing in every book was pretty well done
Deeper'n deeper'n ever Turnip, tater and beetroot pie, motherfucker.
>Watership Down
Call me a faggot but I'm not doing that again.
Seconding Watership Down, and anything else by Richard Adams.
Shardik is my favourite.
Plague dogs is hard to read, it's heartbreaking.
I like redwall.
I read the fuck out of Redwall books when I was in elementary/middle school, they were simultaneously based and redpilled.
I'd gladly recommend they be included in any white ethnostate's children's library.
Great book series. Really miss it. The original Redwall was definitely written for adults, not children.
Based af.
Redwall abbey itself is symbolic of the fragile place civilization holds in a savage world, and the need to guard it against the hordes of invaders seeking to destroy it.
No, they were written for kids.
Just not today's "everything needs to be fluff and soap bubbles with a healthy dose of POZ in it" kids.
He wrote them for a blind kids school, for God's sake.
Huge fan of this series growing up, probably explains how i ended up here
I only watched the cartoons when I was growing up. Do they do the book justice or should I read the books?
>strong women heroes who embody masculine virtues instead of feminine virtues
>vilify predator species because they don't starve themselves to death instead of eating poor innocent good guy mice
>promotes (((veganism)))
How are you dumb faggots even suggesting this trash is red pilled?
>mice are innocent good creatures because no reason
>foxes are evil because they have to eat
Like most anthropomorphic trash, it teaches children to identify with prey and vilify predator. This is anti-nature and anti-white. The NSDAP banned Bambi for a reason.
I used to love reading these books as a kid. Do they still hold up for a jaded adult?
Same, used to watch it on Teletoon. It always had that surreal feel to it, or something ethereal or spiritual for some reason.
Thanks
ReadEra is good on Android. @Voice still t read it to you if you are driving though.
Much like Watership Down.
Epic story packed with redpills
>Women are generally stupid and need to be managed and protected by their males
>Males will inevitably self determine and organizational hierarchy based on strength, bravery, intelligence, enterprise and contribution to the tribe.
>There are bad folk out there and sometimes the only way to get them to leave you in peace is to fight them in war.
>Even War builds communities and diplomacy, in the aftermath the winner will have dominion and responsibility for the losers.
>Sometimes you have to be that tough son of a bitch and go toe to toe with the scariest, meanest, most badass villain because if you don't he's going to kill everyone you love.
>If you're a weakling, you'll just die if you try this. But you'll get props for bravery.
>It helps to make friends and allies in your region and leverage them strategically.
>The customs, myths and religions shared by a tribe are a Part of the tribe and give it structure.
Would never get made properly today.
>@Voice
Thanks for the heads up. this looks very cool.
>dedicating 5+ pages to describing food
based
Read it yourself and see, nigger.
Goddamn it why do my fellow leafs have to be such faggots
Carnivore species
>Roam around in savage hunter gatherer packs. Murdering, raping and pillaging. Never creating any kind of sustainable social structure, just parasitizing off existing ones. Never anything more complex than a mob of violent cunts with the biggest meanest cunt at the top.
Uncivilized barbarians feeding off civilization.
Redwall and friends
>Civilized society with agriculture, trade, laws, religion, history and all the other benefits that goes with a stable society that can feed itself and look after it's people. Still has a militant streak because it knows the carnivores are out there and has repelled them before.
I fucking hate that I share a country with retards like yourself. Please neck yourself.
I actually met Brian Jacques at a library event when I was a kid and he signed my copy of redwall. Dude was based as fuck, spent the whole time talking about honor and glory.
fpbp. I remember Jacques getting criticism for that. Certain species are inherently destructive. I remember in one book, one of the good animals tried to take a vermin pup in but he couldn't resist his nigger nature and was a violent thief.
lmao i used to read this shit, based manchild poster
Absolutely based and Abbeypilled.
Also Redwall > dogshit >>> faggot harry potter
Did you want to make an argument or are you just repeating the kikery? Equating predator species with niggers is 110% kike bullshit, that's the point. You are promoting having kikes tell children they should identify with vermin and be vegans, and should hate strong, intelligent animals that eat meat.
Also nice how you have no rebuttal to the obvious feminism.
>oy vey how dare you reject our glorification of (((veganism))) and (((feminism)))
But they eat fish though
Faggot. You're the one with zero argument.
What is it exactly about a murderous barbarian raider lifestyle is it were supposed to emulate here?
I'll take a vigilant and honourable civilization with based culture over a rabble of fucking brigands any day. And that's not cucking out or being weak.
Civilization needs men to stand watch, and those men tend to be better, sharper and certainly live longer than a pack of ferals seeking only their next meal and to fulfil their base urges.
You disagree with that? Fine.
The way things are going you might have your chance to play Raider, and get your shit clapped by some good man defending his home and the ones he loves. In fact, if you go that route, it's inevitable.
And publish vegan cookbooks.
>What is it exactly about a murderous barbarian raider lifestyle is it were supposed to emulate here?
You aren't, you illiterate nigger. How is a fox eating mice the same as being a "barbarian raider" that should be hated? How is a mouse, disgusting filthy disease spreading vermin, a noble and honorable creature children should identify with?
A: the stories are partly allegorical
B: if they were killing and eating each-other then they wouldn't be civilized
Being vegetarians is a necessary conceit to make their society sorta believable.
Do you know what metaphors are?
Becuse they're allegories for different kinds of people, you dipstick.
Not actual literal animals.
It's a metaphor dipshit. And foxes are indeed pests that kill people's pets, spread diseases and generally fuck shit up.
I was gifted a copy of The Outcast of Redwall when I was a child. It is the only one of the series I read though.
I prefer using an normie samsung android tablet. Reading on my phone is nigga canccer
OMG U EVEN NO WUT MEDAFOR IZ!?!1111111
I really hope you tards are defending this shit because you're still 10. There's no other acceptable excuse.
Furry related anything is never redpilled. Media featuring talking animals makes children get the furry fetish.
Have your children/siblings/cousins read Hatchet instead.
Redwall is based and Hatchet sucks. Not a furry btw.
I'm pretty sure Jewish subversion would be the prey animals trying their hardest to integrate the predators into their society and make concessions and excuses for every act of violence perpetrated against them.
>You're wrong because you're wrong!
Solid argument dude. Take a breath and realize you're not making your point at all well.
These books came out long before all that furry bullshit.
You will never have a singing frog best friend.
Was that the otter?
Plague Dogs is hard to read, but by god the animated movie is breathtaking.
These books were incredible. I don't think I've ever been able to visualize a world like I did when reading this series
Why are you reading children's literature?
And you think that there is only one single thing that would be jewish subversion, and anything else is perfectly good? And why have none of you faggots even attempted to address the huge glaring feminism issue? Because it is completely indefensible. Stories with stronk wimminz heroes are not red-pilled. Period. Stories that brainwash children into thinking of predators in nature as niggers are not red-pilled. Stories that brainwash children into identifying with vermin are not red-pilled.
Furries have been around since the 60s.
No, children's literature just pulled a lot less punches in the past. Literature was once a true bastion of free speech, and was extremely valuable as such. Pop literature has taken a very strong hold on contemporary best-sellers lists, unfortunately, and it's pretty low effort.
imagine reading
have sex incels
Hatchet is a garbage book, and Brian Jacques is based. Get some taste you simpleton fuck.
Rakkety Tam was my favorite book as a young lad