"AGAINST ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC"

HAHA look at how ugly she is

Attached: Christine_Pelosi_2013_(cropped).jpg (756x858, 62.62K)

She's saying that Rand Paul's neighbor was right for punching him in the face. Beat the hell out of him actually.

Trump literally doesn't own any stocks you fucking leaf.

He likes it because there are tests showing it works AND it is not currently patented in America (because Malaria is a third-world disease), which means it can be manufactured and sold at cost. He wants the short-term problem to be solved and then worry about resistances and find a better solution later.

All the kikes in the media and government are flipping out about it because they want the treatment to be a new "breakthrough" cure, regardless of its efficacy or side-effects, regardless of the immediate cost of delaying treatment with Chloroquine, so that they can simultaneously laud the miracles of the High Church of Science, and also sell it for a huge fucking profit for the rest of time (because the virus will be seasonal).

It's really not hard to figure these things out, leafistanibro.

Also it's out of patent. Cloroquine use isn't going to boost any stocks.

Cringe.

why was he talking about beyer? thanking beyer?

It’s not pearl clutching to find this utterly outrageous.
Imagine if Donald Trump Jr said this. He would be arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.

Attached: EbpqUG4.jpg (560x375, 115.15K)

because beyer owns the patent in europe for all the europoors and their gorillanigger imports and they are probably helping in some way as a current manufacturer of the medicine. are you fucking retarded?

She is just an autistic inbred.

Attached: Screenshot from 2020-03-23 18-47-04.png (399x389, 118.96K)

>BAYER
It's a german pharama company and I guess they gave a shit ton of malaria drug to the US. I'm wondering why they aren't giving it to Italy and Iran.

don't be mad and stupid

it's useless they don't want it.
you might as well give people condoms

>and what is known about its effectiveness?
China used it for treatment. South Korea used it for treatment. Nothing about this is new. China discovered it was effective against SARS years ago. China tried using it to treat Coronavirus (aka SARS-CoV-2) because it's similar to SARS. And it worked. There are studies about this:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150618

Clinical trials for it are going on right now
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04261517

Attached: Screenshot from 2020-03-23 18-56-28.png (532x375, 149.32K)

Shes got her father's baggy eyes.

Attached: gettyimages-693700256_custom-65e04d50b532984f66ccb9001eceffe87fcee156-s700-c85.jpg (700x477, 52.5K)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150618
CONCLUSIONS:

Hydroxychloroquine was found to be more potent than chloroquine to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.

Why is it useless, that french professor is saying it's the real deal.

>These are the domestic enemies our founders warned us about.

whites won't do shit about it so it doesn't fucking matter

>are tests showing it works
Anecdotal reports are not evidence you fucking retard.

Here's the link considering that OP is a faggot.

twitter.com/sfpelosi/status/1241871541597437952

archive.is/8PHX3

Attached: 1585001417595.jpg (1068x674, 279.41K)

the second one just describes the test they're doing

looks like it does something in the test tube

Attached: Screenshot from 2020-03-23 19-07-04.png (659x498, 88.71K)

Who is that compact man?

Yes, because as I said, the test is currently ongoing.

Yep. It probably also does something in people, considering China and South Korea have used it successfully. But an official clinical trial proving its efficacy has not been completed yet.

>China discovered it was effective against SARS years ago.
It was discovered by a Belgian virologist and epidemiologist to be effective in vitro.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15351731

>China tried using it to treat Coronavirus
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150618
In vitro is not evidence for in vivo i.e treat covid-19. You treat covid-19 (the disease) not Sars-cov-2 (the virus).

>clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04261517
Meaning we don't know yet if it can works as a treatment.

probably should have went with the condoms

Attached: Screenshot from 2020-03-23 19-17-46.png (578x711, 354.72K)

>self-medicating
He probably took too much and overdosed.

>It was discovered by a Belgian virologist and epidemiologist to be effective in vitro.
Yes. And it has been widely utilized by two governments to treat affected persons.

>In vitro is not evidence for in vivo i.e treat covid-19. You treat covid-19 (the disease) not Sars-cov-2 (the virus).
No. Hydroxychloroquine is purported to inhibit replication of SARS-CoV-2. It is literally treating the virus. It does nothing for the symptoms of COVID-19.

>Meaning we don't know yet if it can works as a treatment.
No.

I kek'd when i read that, this hubris is why the working class should listen to professionals.

What else do you speak from them, user?

Attached: 1584813432099.png (638x640, 207.3K)

>self-medicating
>didn't consult a doctor
>somehow Trump's fault
Blue check marks will be the first in the camps.

That it was okay to crack Rand's ribs.

>No. Hydroxychloroquine is purported to inhibit replication of SARS-CoV-2
IN VITRO, do you know what that means?

>t is literally treating the virus
>A therapy or medical treatment is the attempted remediation of a health problem, usually following a diagnosis
You can't treat a virus only a disease. COrona Virus Disease-19 = COVID-19.

>No.
Yes

What a fucking creature.

>You can't treat a virus only a disease. COrona Virus Disease-19 = COVID-19.
U hi user?

Let me guess, she got BTFO in the thread and is now pretending to be a victim of right wing extremism.

an American hero

Attached: wmim97un.jpg (1412x1693, 240.06K)

No details just death and fear. Retards kill themselves with all kinds of useful things. Does not mean we should ban it or it has no use.

>IN VITRO, do you know what that means?
Yes. The study purports it to work in vitro. It has literally been used in vivo by governments to treat individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. I'm not sure what you're not understanding about this.

>You can't treat a virus only a disease. COrona Virus Disease-19 = COVID-19.
You are dumb. Hydroxychloroquine treats SARS-CoV-2 regardless of whether COVID-19 exists or not (e.g. COVID-19 does not exist in a petri dish, but SARS-CoV-2 does)

>Yes
No.

Do you speak English? or do you suffer form an other mental retardation?

Hydroxychloroquine is less toxic and more effective. We don't really know why it seems to work or why azithromycin seems to help but it's not like we can always explain everything.

Probably half that and the other half agree with her because when Rand was trending the other day I was seeing loads of posts basically saying what she's saying with thousands of likes and retweets.

Rules for thee (us) but not for me (them)

Attached: 1584478808092.jpg (673x521, 30.08K)

Wow, Chrstine.
Racist much, you baggy-eyed whore?
Why are PUBLIC school kids suddenly disease carriers?

Attached: 1566610850040.jpg (660x1000, 144.9K)

you don't have to take too much, it can mess with your heart rhythm and nobody checked his to make sure it was safe before he took it

Just look at the liberal ITT. All they can do is be massive cunts. Its all they know.

It's probably a good idea to take any drugs like that with medical supervision. That said, he also took chloroquine and not hydroxychloroquine.

> The study purports it to work in vitro.
>It has literally been used in vivo by governments to treat individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
Many treatments work in vitro but not in vivo. And governments did not do it on the bases of facts or evidence other than in vitro studies. we have not yet had any evidence from a clinical trail. Which means those anecdotal reports might be completely wrong. We also had in vitro studies and anecdotal reports about Lopinavir–Ritonavir and look how that turned out. So you are absolutely wrong for assuming we have real evidence yet.

nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001282?query=featured_home

azithromycin antibacterial and chloroquine an antispasmodic to treat viruses?

Attached: Screenshot from 2020-03-23 19-33-24.png (585x287, 42.49K)

>You are dumb.
The irony.

>treats
You don't call it a treatment you dunce, i even showed you the definition of a treatment. Learn to speak your own goddamn language monkey.

>A therapy or medical treatment is the attempted remediation of a health problem, usually following a diagnosis

>No.
Yes

>Many treatments
Many anti-viral drugs*

What they didn't tell you is that he ate aquarium cleaner at a high dose and, shockingly, it killed him

That looks uncomfortable, she should probably get a taller walker.

holy shit FBI arrest that bitch

>Responding twice to the same post.
Someone is mad.

>Many treatments work in vitro but not in vivo.
No shit.

> we have not yet had any evidence from a clinical trail.
Correct. Considering trials will take months to conclude, we need to use what evidence we currently have, or just let people die I guess.

True facts. He used fish chloroquine he got from eBay. We have no idea what dosage he took, what purity the "chloroquine" was, or whether it even was chloroquine.

>you don't have to take too much
You clearly have no grasp of moderation or relativity, much less context.

Yeah it doesn't make a lot of sense. They must have some other mechanism of action that isn't fully understood. It's thought that maybe hydroxychloroquine binds to the same receptors the virus does and just blocks the virus from invading cells.

Attached: hydroxy.jpg (1548x1080, 305.21K)

Attached: 1533846844899.jpg (926x764, 266.55K)

antiplasmodic

Words hurt! How will these demz get away with it!

>we need to use what evidence we currently have
We have none, because it does not meat the criteria of evidence. The same as source my ass is not evidence.

>or just let people die I guess.
You don't even know how this medicine will interacts with this pathology. Honesty all your assumptions of how sciences works have been wrong thus far. You should focus on manual labour.

Do you read conservative treehouse by any chance?

What are you talking about? If you have long QT and don't know it, you can take a normal therapeutic dose and die. It's pretty obvious what I meant.

>It's thought that maybe hydroxychloroquine binds to the same receptors the virus does and just blocks the virus from invading cells.
Another possible method of action is that hydroxychloroquine is a zinc ionophore (in vitro)[0] and zinc inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase transcription (in vitro)[1].

[0] ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182877/
[1] ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973827/

>We have none, because it does not meat the criteria of evidence.
Got it, so you're clearly in the "just let them die" camp then.

are you all this stupid in Ireland?

You said you don't have to take too much. Within the context of the person that died taking the chemical, it was clearly too much.
Context supersedes generalization.