>What do? Understand the arguments Challenge your own point of view Get Yas Forums /prep/ Find like-minded people Create memes
>Who is Theodore „Ted“ John Kaczynski? Neo-Luddite Confirmed 167 IQ INTJ Man of Action PhD in Mathematics /ourguy/
>"He was an unusual person. He was not like the other graduate students. He was much more focused about his work. He had a drive to discover mathematical truth," said professor Peter Duren. "It is not enough to say he was smart," said George Piranian, another of his Michigan mathematics professors. >In 1967, Kaczynski's dissertation Boundary Functions[36] won the Sumner B. Myers Prize for Michigan's best mathematics dissertation of the year.[8] Allen Shields, his doctoral advisor, called it "the best I have ever directed",[23] and Maxwell Reade, a member of his dissertation committee, said "I would guess that maybe 10 or 12 men in the country understood or appreciated it."
By using internet and web inteconnectivity, they are not only datamining your info and predicting your activities by exploiting cognitive bias, They are also implanting ideas in our minds based on what they already know, thus creating a feedback loop of what we defined as "artificial scychronicity" with the deepmind AI. 5G and similar technologies will be the start of the beta testing. >inb4 it doesn't read your mind, it just gathers massive data from your microphones, cameras, GPS location, significant others and browsing history and predicts your actions based on virtual models No shit >inb4 5G is nothing but a DEW (Direct Energy Weapon), it will never enable interconnected AI's to enhance a totalitarian technocracy It is a DEW an also the start of a mass surveillance and mind programming cyberpunk dystopia. It's both things.
ha that dumb ass will have have an epiphany if he ever gets the attention span to read what ted wrote.
Ian Collins
so what should we do- how do we take the system down?
Josiah Bell
Are you the Mario from yesterday who spend 9 hours in that thread, saying he was too busy reading something that would take 2 hours max?
i suggest you start reading
Parker Cooper
>The industry system is a cancer for human, but we have been addicted to it. Tell us about the creepy social system that you guys use, how long until people can lower your score just with an unaproving glare? how long until flying drones come down from the skies to take you away when your score drops too low?
learn about EMP handheld devices, chaff interference, signal jammers, basic C++ coding, basic networking, overriding face recognition, analog technology...just for begginers. Don't just try to "destroy" technology like a scared monkey; learn to use tech to sabotage tech. Consider the analogy about teaching a person to fish, rather than giving the fish.,
Brayden Reed
Is there any word besides Panopticon to describe this? You got ''smart locks'' in doors nowadays, you can't enter apartments without there being knowledge of it.
Justin Sullivan
oh, technophile detected.
Please tell us all, how will technology have a net benefit for the human race in the coming decade?
>how will technology have a net benefit for the human race in the coming decade? wheels are technology, the tip of a spear is war technology. Beware the jew controlling the digital outputs...that's the real danger, Free technology is a beautiful thing.
Think you have to read his post again. Doesn't sound very technophilic to me!
Let's be honest, the means to cause most trouble for the system are all technological. In theory. I don't condone such behaviour. Would be really, really bad for the system if someone did something to it!
Luis Phillips
i am naturally technophobe. there's no way i could do that shit. i am unironically drawn to cabin life like uncle ted. The other thing as much as i do believe industrial society has been disaster for us, how can we unknow it? It is demonic and has demonic power- original sin guarantees somone womehwere making use of it and enslaving the rest
Jonathan Collins
>in the coming decade do you really want to share ideas, or are you just going to make me explain myself over petty semantics as long as you can engage on contrarian pilpul? Because I wiuld be more than glad to explain how a proper modern ludd should know about technology and how it should be implemented for the greater good.
Cameron Hughes
Disprove him witout:
Ad hominem >But he was tranny, MK-Ultra'd, killed dogs and people, incel, etc. Strawmen >He was an AnPrim, AnPrims are cringe Tu quoque (+ Strawman) >If you hate technology why do you use it? Appeal to nature >Technological growth is natural and normal to us Appeal to Judaism >It's not technology, it's the Jews!
>i am unironically drawn to cabin life like uncle ted. Okay, that's good maybe you just have a different profile. I suggest to learn about botanics, utilitary sowing (taking the maximun advantage of the least space). You can learn how to work the wood and the steel, animal behaviour, hunting, tracking, reading the weather patterns...all that would be very important once civilization falls.
Owen Walker
I'd add David Jonstad's "Kollaps" to this. I don't know if it's been translated to english though.
Also, Alan Weisman's "World without us" and "World full of us" are must read.
Luke Bell
mmkay. Use your imagination a bit. Let's picture a cool libertarian proto republic, made of homogenous and small populations, something like tribes. These tribes like to keep a small number and infraestructure, most of them are self-reliable, there's still a free market. There is no real state as a third party contolling the state apparatus, the state is the people guided by the tribe elders; there are no banks, no secret societies, no federal reserves....none of that. Now imagine real time democracy for the first time, everybody voting real time on things they consider important, no propaganda, no bullshit, just free internet mean for free people to have a real democratic republic. The key: no kikes. Capitalism? works without kikes. Socialism? works without kikes...
>as i do believe industrial society has been disaster for us, how can we unknow it? You mean that ''why wouldn't we invent the industrial society again''?
One must first realize that all technology relies on a series of thousands of smaller inventions. The common narrative of inventions is that one big brain nigga just had a genius idea that revolutionized the world. That is a simplistic and false narrative.
How many here could build a steam locomotive from scratch? I mean, literally dig the ore out of the ground and make a steam locomotive? Let's disregard the fact that you need hundreds of spare workers (workers not busy working on the fields or hunting). If the system collapses, almost all knowledge will disappear. Knowing the simple theoretical construction of a steam engine doesn't mean you or your descendants will actually be able to build one.
Jayden Brooks
is this supposed to be in the OP instead of epstein video?
i just mean the cat is out the bag. Technology is intimately related (i should think) to war. While there is war there will always be strongest impetus to technological advancement. And the argu,ent 'let's win this wat, let's surivive, then we'll decide what's right or wrong' will always be unanswerable. In other words, what i am probably saying is- the problem is not so much technology as such but immorality.
Brody Harris
you can imagine a moral society may have made all the same advancements, but more slowly, and at the service of man's *moral' advancement (relatively anyway).
I shall read uncle ted, as i am strongly sympathetic to his ideas, but i sense here (only sense) that there is the danger of falling into that heresy of thinking, if we remove this thing X everything will be better, but the problem is always man, not thing X, thing X being secondary (though admittedly evil).
Aaron Powell
>You know, your very specific dream utopia has to develop from the current system, right? yes, that's actually a pretty objective observation. My point is not about the odds for the utopia to become a reality, my point was just being able to visualize the scenario of "mass media technology" applied in a trully liberating way. Now let's not turn this into a "black or white spectrum" in which you imply I have said how everybody should have a fucking cellphone with internet connection for all sorts of frivolous leisure and retroactive brainwashing. This is like discussing if guns kill people, or if dumb people using guns kill people, or if kikes handling the weapons to stupid people is what's killing people.
For sure, nobody here is so lunatic that they expect people to willingly stop trying to advance technologically. It is very natural for human beings, since the first spears and stone axes were made it was thought: how can this be made better? The thing is, you don't actually get an industrial society without >stable institutions >leisure time >sophisticated agriculture that can sustain thousands of people doing something else but farming >massive reserves of easily accessible energy (humans have extracted all the easily accessible coal+oil out of the ground for the past 200 years now)
I subscribe to the Will To Power theory of human motivation. Obviously people will always try to create more technology if it gives power/advantage over other tribes. But that doesn't mean they will be able to.
Benjamin Robinson
Ted was possibly the most insightful man since Nietzsche. It's a shame his ideas are damned by his actions.
Logan Gutierrez
Not available in english as far as I know, but my copy has not only been read at my own house, it's circulated atleast three others too. To any user wondering what's so special about David Jonstad's Kollaps, it's basically uncle Ted's preachings in a more subtle, presentable package. As unbelieveable as it sounds, sometimes, telling people to read a known terrorists manifesto might be a tough sell. David Jonstad delievers the same message, but has yet to bomb anyone.
1 Jun 2000 - A series of purposely brutalizing psychological experiments may have confirmed Theodore Kaczynski's still-forming belief in the evil of science ...
Xavier Sanders
>telling people to read a known terrorists manifesto might be a tough sell. It might be counter-intuitive, but I've had way fucking easier time persuade people to read Unaboomer manifesto than literally any other book I've ever shilled. Obviously I'm not autistic enough to regularly ''push'' books on people, but Ted has been an easy sell.
Making bad deeds usually only raises people's curiosity: they want to get inside the head of a ''madman'' who actually did something instead of being a mere literal-who writer.
Finland Bro, I was thinking of ways how we can make this whole /TKG/ better:
The same question pop up over and over, for example: why wouldn't a new technological system evolve? Wasn't he just a victim of MKUltra? Therefore I am working on an FAQ right now.
Also: I think we both agree that people here should wake up. After all, that is the whole premise of these threads. Maybe a list would be useful, of recent technology and how it has impacted society negatively (for example hook-up apps, social media, ..)
Yesterday there were also some Greta Thunabomber memes. To my surprise, they resonated well with the audience. Yet, I am still sceptical of it, because Greta is highly correlated with leftism in the public (even if she herself might not necessarily be a leftist herself), and contact with leftists is to be avoided at all costs. However, we need memes to get the message out.
Another thing: Yesterday I cited paragraphes from ISAIF, some anons said this was prophetic. I am working through ISAIF again to see, what can be used. Maybe I should be doing the same with ATRev (I like Ted's example of kingdoms competing for a forest, and in the end the forest dies).
Last thing: Do you think it would be good to have a fixed time for /TKG/ once a day? It would make it easier for me to not use up all of my free time, because I too have shit to do. Perhaps, more people will tune in the long run? (For example every day at 2pm EST, as this was the time i started the first thread yesterday, and it received great traffic, 300+ replies, people saying they really want more etc.)
How do i live in accordence with the deep ecology ideology?The only way i envision doing it is working through the system to earn enough money to buy a plot of land and try to live as self sufficient as possible.one problem is that i will have to move country since there is no woodland in ireland.
Lincoln Adams
third time: >>Even if, would it make his ARGUMENTS worse? No.
Charles Wilson
yes but try asserting in polite/common every day normie world that he is the greatest philosopher of the past 50-100 years
Easton Myers
No woodland ?
Gavin Thomas
what does he think about corona chan?
Caleb Turner
TKG#1 started at 3:20 pm EST, consistent posts until 9pm, then traffic slowly subsided.
I suggest we do one TKG a day, let's try 2pm tomorrow
