Female Unshodism also known as the Deshodding Movement are 21st Century reactions to not only consumerism but consumerism's haphazard intersection with slavery, sex trafficking, exploitation and destruction.
Unshodism critically examines women's shoes as symbolic for both those terrible practices as well as the social conditioning programmed into modern women to support any lucrative fashions no matter how illegal, unethical or harmful.
How can you support Deshodding and Unshodism?
>Celebrate barefoot women in art, media
>Establish and defend the preference for unshod women (remember, it's the pre-capitalist norm)
>Introduce positive aspects of barefoot women in everyday conversation
>Invent new idioms and stories defining the advantages and wisdom of unshod women
>Compliment and support unshod women
>Public shaming of shoe whores, flat-flappers, heel-danglers, flip-flop fidgeters
>Public shaming of the men parading slave-made shoes on their women's oppressed feet
>Protest women shoe stores that sell any shoes beyond those intended for wear inside a domesticated home (e.g. slippers).
>Remind women and men of the evils of shoe supply chains, shoe designers and shoe brands
>Ignore shoe shills and their tiddy and assmen-junkies
Female Deshodding General
What this is:
>This is a movement in order to simply remove all footwear from women, as it would prevent them from going in the workplace, and to encourage them to stay at home and retain the family unit, which is smallest possible unit of national identity. Women's shoe apparel manufacturers artificially created a degenerate culture, founded by (((them))), and ran almost exclusively by homosexual men (who have no interest in women), around the time of the Women's Suffrage Movement, in order to empower women, cripple their feet in unnatural ways, and as a status symbol for degenerate promiscuity. Barefoot women were often looked up to with attraction, and were preferred in the arts and media prior to the 20th century, as it pertains to their natural beauty, submissiveness, and humility, as can be seen today when women would often subconsciously make men want to notice their feet, such as paint their nails, make suggestive movements, and to keep dry or cracking skin from forming.
What this is NOT:
>This is in no way to be confused or mistaken with paraphilia regarding women's feet. This is also not intended to be a short-lived fashion trend, and is not only to be restricted to just young, attractive women. Anything regarding that as such would be considered degenerate, and counteractive to this movement. This is also in no way to be marketed in a way to be monetized in any possible way.
Advantages:
>Women would be kept out of the workplace and workforces, as they were prior to the 20th century, and would have men provide the finances for the sustainability of the family as a whole.
>Women's feet would be healthier and naturally shaped.
>Anti-American (and Anti-Western) women's shoe manufacturers would all go bankrupt, as well as women saving up their money for more meaningful possessions.
>In order to protect women's feet in urban areas, cities would start aggressive ordinances to clean up the sidewalks and streets, thus reducing pollution and disease.
I, for one, support this
Will you do your part in encouraging women to undertake this movement user? It would be the best possible way to return to a traditional society, and this virus may be helping with this, seeing how millions of the probably haven't even worn any footwear in at least a week.
>wanting dirty, bruised girlfeet
fuck off with your crypto-footfag horseshit.
No real man cares about what a woman does with the lowest part of her body and any smart woman knows that hyper-consumerist highheel bullshit is impractical as fuck. So op is just a fag that likes smelly women feet on his face or some shit.
Actually, yes they do.
We men are hardwired to look at women's feet as attractive, due to delicateness. Women subconsciously want men to notice their feet, due to them painting their nails, grooming them, wearing footwear that exposes them, and even moving them around in playful gestures. We see their feet as an extension of their delicate, feminine nature, and our biological instincts suggest that the women would stay at home and raise our kids properly. It was only when (((they))) decided to create Anti-American shoe industries for women, ran almost exclusively by gay men, in order to prevent their delicate vulnerabilities, and instead, create illusion of empowerment over men, and because workplaces requires footwear, meant that women wearing shoes practically opened the door to women working outside of the home, and destroying the Family Unit.
Trust me that even if you try to deny or suppress it, an unshod woman is more attractive, as well as more vulnerable and submissive. That is the reason (((they))) attempt to brainwash women into buying as much footwear as possible. It goes against their instincts for their nature, as well as our instincts, to find them attractive.
Or maybe it's an ultimate form of disempowering women.
Think about it: without shoes they can't very well participate in modern society outside the home, can they? Being so disenfranchised what is left to them? Family, home, husband? Why is that bad?
Shoes are a symbol of feminine materialism and greed. Take it away and what do they have left? Family, home, husband? Why is that bad?
But, sure...
Why play these games?
Why dress it up with such bullshit?
Why not cut to the chase and simply take away all women's rights?
It would make them more submissive, less empowered, and more attractive.
Every sane man would realize that a girl would be even MORE attractive sans-footwear, than if she were wearing any.
Thats Uma Thurmans daughter.
>This is in no way to be confused or mistaken with paraphilia regarding women's feet.
>responds with footfag rant
Figures. My waif gf has the cutest feet and I pay no attention to them because the rest of her body is amazing. Hope you like girls with hookworm.
Plus, there is a really good chance that they may get on board with doing this, especially if they find it "fun" to do so. But that is the least of my worries with this. My worries is if this becomes a passing fad, rather than taking a permanent foothold in society.
We can not let this be temporary, rather we need to make this permanent. The future of society is at stake.
You mean parasites that come from raw sewage and feces mostly?
Cities would be forced to clean up, and nobody with half a brain would dare step into one of those unsanitary places.
How are you going t do that when not wearing shoes is at odds with participating in modern society? the majority of surfaces an urban or suburban dwelling woman walks on are hard as fuck, no these quaint patches of dirt in your pictures. So to go around outside like this would be suffering. And if they are willing to suffer they'll just wear heels because heels make a womans ass look good. I doubt a bunch of virgins can meme something more painful than heels that offers no benefits into being attractive to women.
Admit it, youre the footfag equivalent of the guy arguing that all women should go around with their boobs or asses out. Fucking impractical and stupid fetish shit.
>Plus, there is a really good chance that they may get on board with doing this, especially if they find it "fun" to do so
Shut up, faggot.
This isn't about "getting women on board" or whatever. It's about simply making women submit to the male will for the good of civilization.
It should be enacted with complete disregard for women's will.
If we win they will obey and participate and follow regardless.
If we lose they will immediately switch sides.
Fuck off with your fetish.
>a permanent foothold
Hookworm is ctually way worse in rural areas. y'know, places with all these cute spots of dirt these girls are paid to take fetish pictures in. There isn't raw shit on sidewalks. No one would willingly walk around barefoot in a modern city because that shit hurts.
Have you seen the maps of hobo feces in California? CA is also one of the COVID hotspots.
have you seen a map of where hookworm is prevalent you fucking retard?
They would not be able to hold careers due to refusing to acknowledge the dress code, PLUS it would make them more vulnerable. They would not gain any power over men, no matter what.
It's not a fetish. I just need to find a way to make sure that this could take place, if at all. The important thing is if women do this, AT ALL.
Pun was not intended.
eat the bugs
And San Franshitsco, as well as other Californian cities, would be forced to clean up big time, or face endless lawsuits up the ass.
Made for BBC
hi footfags. dont let me ruin your thread or anything
Just another childish hipster attempt at attention seeking and victim-signalling.
Fuck off.
>They would not be able to hold careers due to refusing to acknowledge the dress code, PLUS it would make them more vulnerable.
so you accept this sin't going to be something you can meme women into doing then right? This would require some top down authoritarian shit.
>It's not a fetish
Says the guy who clearly has a large folder of womens feet.
footfags to the camps.
They would be willing. But there wouldn't be much for them to do, barefoot.
This disempowers women.
you eat the bugs
>would require some top down authoritarian shit.
>to the camps.
Hmmmmmm.
As a girl, shoes terrify me. I feel they're ways doing secret damage to me. I'd gladly support this but cities have to clean their sidewalks, please and thank you!
user, you can't make a political movement out of your fetisch, I've already tried with scat
He is projecting and seething.
He doesn't know that most femanons who have replied to these threads in the past, have actually, unironically SUPPORTED this.
See what I mean?
Also Femanon, please spread this idea to other women you know.
All these femanons posted with ti estamp and their tits out I hope.
>They would be willing.
>Willing to prevent themselves holding jobs
>All so they can suffer more and look worse than they would in heels
>and maybe get hookworm on top of that
Shows how much you know about women. Which is also why you have such a retarded simp fetish.
No.
Don't scare them off user. Even a femanon in a prior thread a few days ago who had the same exact position as the one who is posting here didn't want to do it, since she knew what power her feet had over men.
I don't think this femanon is the same one however.
it would be easier to round up all the footfags than it would to get women to stop wearing shoes. Women would probably arm themselves just to wear shoes. They fucking love those things.
You don't understand how fashion works.
Women should wear feminine boots. Men should wear masculine boots.
Only Leftists who are indoctrinated. But they can be de-indoctrinated, if enough guys that they are attracted to would refuse to let them be shod.
Should women have socks?
based
>some footfag trying to gain mainstream acceptance for the cooms
I do far more than you. Fashion is the anesthetization of form following function. Part of it bends to popular opinion of what is attractive, but not enough footfags out there to meme this into being a popular opinion. Plus The average footfag is not who women are trying to appeal to. Keep your humilation oriented fetishes out of politics. Go pay a hooker to step on your face and balls or whatever.
That looks like female Nicolas Cage
No. Socks still provide protection against their vulnerabilities, and would empower them, albeit not as much to the same tier as hard footwear.
Should solely be used sparingly, ONLY in situations that ABSOLUTELY demands it (which aren't many).
What else should women wear or not wear?
They should wear everything else. Would massively help if they dressed modestly, instead of slutty.
>Only Leftists who are indoctrinated
Nah. Try taking a valley girl's high heels. You'd get your face shot off.
>if enough guys that they are attracted to would refuse to let them be shod.
Yeah but most guys women are attracted to like doing things like taking them out to places that have sidewalks and shit. You'd know women like stuff like that if you werent a footfag.
What type of dresses, skirts, shirts, hats, jewelry, etc should they wear?
you again, counteract all those unshoddism, with 50 pair of sandals of the same manufacturer, collected by a woman alone.
This
>Nah. Try taking a valley girl's high heels. You'd get your face shot off.
Valley girls are all indoctrinated by (((them))). Mostly consisting of low IQ and could not say anything without having to say the word "like" after every two words. They are malleable to whatever mainstream pop-culture tells them what they "should" be. We could, and should shame them back into submission, including with what I am proposing.
>Yeah but most guys women are attracted to like doing things like taking them out to places that have sidewalks and shit. You'd know women like stuff like that if you werent a footfag.
Not true. Most men are not attracted to them, and mostly find them promiscuous, a below-average IQ, and they would be much more likely to cheat on them with Tyrone (who would beat her up, impregnate her, then ditch her). A large portion for what I am doing is for the protection of women themselves, both health-wise (feet would not be malformed due to shoe-wear), and societal-wise (would be mostly restricted to in and around the home).
Any place where it is safe where women could be barefoot in all the time, is a place worth living in.
>women should look frumpy except for the part that makes my maladjusted dick hard
kill yaself
Mostly similar types of clothing I have been posting in this thread.
Clean your streets and you can see our feets
>Clean your streets and you can see our feets
Clean your streets and you can see our feets
>Clean your streets and you can see our feets
This is the dumbest general in a while
>Not true. Most men are not attracted to them
Most men like how a girl looks in heels because they are paying attention to how their whole body looks.
>tyrone, niggers, bbc, blah blah blah
pic related
>The biggest detractors to this idea are women with ugly feet.
Yummy thread OP. I read none of it but cute bare feet!
Exactly. Why not go to Twitter or Facebook, and turn that into a chant? If it gets popular enough on Twitter, then this could be easier for us to do.
And don't you find it ironic, since you're a femanon, that the men here are AGAINST this, yet you are all for it?
It makes guys like these
Seem like real losers.
kek