Should young girls even be allowed to own objects that are shaped like this? It's immodest

It's my flute, because I'm bigger and stronger.
The weak should fear the strong, and this hypothetical acknowledges that even though I didn't make the flute it's mine to distribute.

Not only is the flute mine, but all three children are my property as well.

Kid tries to throw a rock. Other kids shut him down.

Yep. It would work.

None of the little shits. I keep the flute and they can rent it from me for 6 gorillion an hour.

i mean, the kids can just get rocks off the black market

kid b made the flute with her own materials
it is her flute

if kid a or kid c gets the flute then theft was involved

Have I got a helicopter ride for you!

Totally free comrade. Step on board.

Fuck you commie shill

>But you can punish A and C for trying to steal it from B.
this

I can't give it to anyone, it isn't mine.

But I can punish A and C for attempting to steal it.

Loaded question. Giving it to any of them implies I have possession of it when I have zero reason to have taken it from the person who made it.

My man.

B. Private property bitch.

Give them all the skin flute

based

It's not mine to give. B is the rightful owner. A and B should have an amicable discussion that will likely resolve any conflict.

Put a bullet in C. They will contribute nothing but mob support for some cunt that wants to come along saying they have a right to redistribute property.

Keep it for myself and make them all work to buy it.

Like totally maaaaaaaaaaaan.
Stop smoking weed.

Attached: moly.jpg (598x792, 61.87K)

Child B hires child C to mass produce flutes for children like child A. Child B then sells business to child J who
* petitions Congress for open borders and work visas
* forces child C to train child Poo
* forces child Poo to work overtime or be forced back to his home, PooLand
* fires child C to increase profits

This sign is intended to mock gun rights but it's not wrong.

break it in 3 part
shove a piece up there ass to all 3

Are there normies out there who actually think A or C should get the dildo? I mean, you could make a shitty case for A, but anyone who wants to give it too C should be shot on sight.

B made it, why do you want to steal it from her in the first place? The question is invalid to begin with.

If all the others throw rocks at the first little bitch, everyone else will think twice about casting stones

I know someone who doesnt have a phone. Please turn yours in for the betterment of all

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Buy it from B, mark up the price, sell it to A. Everyone gets what they deserve.

Attached: 1553555480937.jpg (400x465, 71.28K)

>but so is "private property"
You're not a socialist, you're a retard.

Attached: 1353994206887.jpg (179x200, 7.17K)

>takes rock off child
>child finds another rock
>"but i took his rock off him!!"
Wow, just like real life.

>Everyone gets what they deserve
Only if Kid B uses the proceeds to buy a gun and shoot Kid C in the face. Only then would everyone "get what they deserve"

Attached: commie propoganda.png (1214x1095, 341.9K)

B

get child B to create two more flutes, then get child A to teach the other two to play, then busk on the street to recuperate costs

It's clearly the property of child b.
I don't believe in redistribution of other peoples' property.

/thread

I like it when people post eye opening shit like this. Thank you.

Apples and Oranges since private person isn't the same as a company.

I guarantee my bank account is lower than yours right now.
I want you to take some of my debt and give me some of your money. Because it will improve my lot in life measurably.

You can also punish B by stealing it and giving it to one of those other brats.

this

None. I ignore all of the children and take the flute for myself, then sell it online.

This is bullshit. The teacher should not be handing out rocks to the kids. The kids should have to find their own rocks without the teacher giving them a handout.

Besides its the same like saying "Obama didn't do anything wrong" and replacing Obama with Hitler. With that logic we can make also some nice posters ;)

The thought that there are people out there who would wholeheartedly, unironically choose A or C over B makes me physically fucking ill.

Why not punish all of them for arguing instead of solving their problems peacefully? Cut and smash the flute into three equal portions of tiny pieces and force them all to eat it.

I give it to myself of course lolbertarians on suicide watch

Attached: 1539544018083.png (1000x1000, 157.49K)

Contest determines 2 winners out of 3.
The winners draw straws.
Fair.

Why fucking flutes? That just ruins the whole point

I wouldn't give the flute to anyone, it already belongs to child B so it's not my decision.
What a stupid fucking picture.

B made the flute and can Learn to play the flute
A can play the flute but is also capable of making the flute so she can't have it
C can fuck himself

Hello, based department?

>>Helicopter>>

Attached: images (9).jpg (183x275, 6.16K)

have sex with all of them and give it to the one with the tightest pussy

It's not fair, it's not up to chance. Neither A nor C have any legitimate claim whatsoever. Any gamble against B's will that pointlessly jeopardizes B's chance of being allowed retain her property that she manufactured
from her own material is completely obviously unjust.

That's not socialism.
And you just defended private property by picking B.
And some faggot coming to take your land is socialism, rich and private or powerful and public who cares.

If child A already knows how to play the flute they obviously have access to a fucking flute they can play, why do they need another one?

Gather the two redheaded human children behind me and square up with the alien infiltrator attempting to play the part of a human child. It's obviously not a flute but some sort of particle phaser type weapon, or maybe just some sort of tricorder.

You can also torture and wrong* B by stealing it and giving it to one of those other brats.
FTFY retard

Thanks for making me laugh

How about compromise? B gives it to A on the sole condition that A shoves it up C's anus.

You have no idea what kind of psychopaths run this world.

Attached: 1389404579730.png (1582x491, 220.81K)

Rule 34 on B

It is socialism. You just don't have any idea what socialism is. I'm sorry to say that, because I know it's cliche socialist behavior, but that's true. Socialism has nothing to do with what you probably think.
And it's not "private property" I defended, it's "personal property". That is the socialist concept of property. If you inhabit something, or put your labor into it, or possess it directly, then it is "your" property. "Private" property is what we have today, where you can "have" a house on one side of the country, then the other side of the country, and even though you're not even there the state will use force and violence to protect it for you, even if a homeless beggar takes up shelter in that residence from a storm. So you're basically just snatching up the land and stealing it from everyone else with the aid of the violence from statism.

This or A should trade B a commodity for the flute, so B can produce more flutes and other goods. C literally fucks off.

>a child presumably finding abandoned wood and using tools that she privately owns to craft a flute for herself is supposed to be equivalent to a worker being given wood and tools and then given money to turn the wood into a flute, but still wanting to keep the flute because "they made it"
B is the right answer simply because the people who made the image misrepresented their position as one that actually makes sense.

Ugh. You also, see here

execute all of them
burn the flute

gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8

>be goverment
>take flute for yourself
and you talk here like there is another option fucking sheeps

Well you can pick up a rock anywhere the teacher doesnt have to hand them out to begin with