Should young girls even be allowed to own objects that are shaped like this? It's immodest.
Should young girls even be allowed to own objects that are shaped like this? It's immodest
C needs to get out of his ass and find some cheap wood to make a flute if hes so poor like B.
The duty of government is to correct the inherent injustice of existence. Child C is the only correct answer.
B should sell it to A. C can fuck off.
Who am I to decide who gets the flute?
This is not a primary concern of mine, I have no authority over the situation.
I would give it to B, but IDK man I am a socialist so I think whatever point this cartoon is trying to make is backwards. I'm a socialist because I believe in B. Like "taxation is theft" yeah, OK, but so is "private property". So the private property thing comes first.
Like it's the same thing, if I plant seeds on the ground, and build my house on the ground, and then the state comes along and says "nope, you gotta leave, some rich billionaire / millionaire just paid us for this property, and it's theirs now" that is bullshit. Same goes for landlords, if I'm living on land and cultivating it, and inhabiting it.
So that's why I'm a socialist. This cartoon is backwards and IDK, I guess conservatives really just don't think this way or examine the concept of property and economics and the violent statism inherently attached to it. Maybe conservatives are well intentioned, but just don't fully think our society through.
This sounds like Bs problem.
See and
Tpbp
Literal communist, kys
I'd give it to all three kids, the boy in the butt, and then I'd steal the flute.
You can't "give it" to any of them.
But you can punish A and C for trying to steal it from B.