IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle

Cope. IQ is the only thing in the social sciences that has survived the replication crisis.

All this does is support the adage: brains won’t make you rich, but lack of brains will sure as hell make you poor.

Tesla died poor and Paris Hilton is a billionaire

> there are millions of +150 IQ folks picking garbage

doubt. you might get a few people who have autistic like intelligence in one or two areas but a general IQ of 150 strongly implies success in life, not counting for major disabilities in other areas (e.g. mental illness)

>OP completely BTFO's IQ with readily available data
>Faggots just keep coping
Like this low IQ loser here

If you measure success by earning potential then yes the correlation breaks down at higher levels.
A high iq person without drive or wants sees no need in earning >30k a year. Hell I'm earning ~60k at a piss easy job that I could be content with for the rest of my life. Why try harder, waste energy, etc for cash when it doesn't really matter?

>We have thousands of sub 80 IQ athletes
i doubt that these athletes are 80 IQ.

>highest IQ in the world
>rancher/bartender
lol

Attached: lol.jpg (480x360, 19.14K)

>doubt.
You don't need to doubt it, it's a mathematical fact. There will be some very high IQ people distrubuted among lower professions, if you account for the entire human population, there will be a lot.

>doubt
Except our jewfren is correct.

I agree with you, kike. IQ tests were also made by an ashkenazi. They are literally a product of the jewish psychology.

Its only valid at the low end. IQ has been extrapolated and shilled by psychologists (mostly cat ladies) to HR instathots to screen for jobs that resemble taking an IQ test (paper shuffles, clerks, bureaucrats). The performance difference between individuals with different IQ is significantly smaller that the difference in IQ in different tests taken by the same individual.

Net worth is not the only measure of success. Additionally there is an effect where highly intelligent people are less successful than you'd expect because there are increasingly few people who can actually comprehend them.

Also, who the hell has a net worth of 230K? If you’ve got brains and can manage your finances, then that’s chump change. Your charts are leaving out some important data points.

Super super smart people usually fall into two groups:
1. Megalomaniacal CEOs / Politicians / Actors
2. Innadawoods type recluses. Live in small homes away from society and avoid people.

>Look, a person with 60 IQ is not going to be a CEO [..] There is just no actual statistical correlation

What did the filthy kike mean by this?

IQ doesnt measure upbringing, early childhood development, emotional intelligence, motivation or drive among others. yeah you could have a genius mopping floors and a literal retard running a huge company. But how many just smart as shit people have you met who cannot function IRL?? Now having a higher IQ than not is one of the biggest predictors of future success. Although its a case by case basis, what is the person going to do with it?

Chris Langan is proof the whole thing is bullshit, supposedly this high IQ savant yet he has contributed nothing of substance to society.

you need to be a psychopath for number 1, not intelligent

Statitistical arguments require large numbers. Not "i know this rich guy and hes smart"

>oy vey
>niggers aren't stupid
>IQ is just a scam

read them and WEEP kike:
thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/02/06/correlations-of-iq-with-income-and-wealth/
inc.com/business-insider/why-iq-big-factor-future-success-job-performance-according-science-research.html
ifstudies.org/blog/can-intelligence-predict-income
This one used AFQT which is what the US armed forces does, and while the author insists there are other factors that come into play when predicting income, the correlation between income and IQ is high for the social sciences at around .5 r-squared with the data this individual gathered
Even this article which proclaims smart people are "no better off" still admits they are more demanding consumers and earn more:
newscientist.com/article/dn11711-smarter-people-are-no-better-off/

So your assertion that 60 IQ niggers can't be CEOs is based on a statistical argument? Or are you just pulling it out of your ass?

>A creature massively warped
>Who is taught from birth to hate, fear and mislead you
>Who literally believes you are cattle given to him by God to do whatever with.
>Who has a thoroughly established track record of deception, genocide, child molestation and outright evil.
>Is talking to me, trying to convince me of some facet of its latest scheme.

Once you know, it all becomes just noise.
When things kick off, don't talk to them, don't let them into your head. Their only strength is Lies. And lies can be ignored.

Attached: 1540179314508.png (803x821, 604.73K)

based taleb. reminder that he was/is right about basically everything

Attached: Dfp197zXkAEVwPm.jpg (1200x507, 66.58K)

IQ is real but conscientiousness is a better predictor of success.

Looking at graphs is worthless. Calculate the correlation for the raw data or give me averages and distributions for each IQ cohort, then we can talk.

Reminder that Taleb is dumb as pigshit.
ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2019/01/08/nassim-taleb-on-iq/

Attached: 1568561900254.png (2038x1337, 529.74K)

Its based on the statistical fact that OVER 99% of CEOs are not 60 IQ retards. If you find one that isnt, its not statistically relevant. Literally cherrypicking specific cases.

>Argument By Insult
It's entertaining I guess, but arabs are still 85 IQ inbred shitskins, which is why their countries are failures. Taleb can't deal with the fact that he's one of 100,000 of his kind.

Put whites on an island, get Iceland
Put Asians on an island, get Taiwan
Put niggers on an island, get Haiti

Net worth doesn't match IQ cause they're different things. A sports ball player doesn't have to be smart. Fuck off, kike.

Oh, so IQ does matter, statistically. Cool.

Thank you

Can you read the OP at all?

>E-excuse me, Mister Taleb, sir, what's that giant cluster of dots down at the lower left hand corner of your chart?

And a kike, to make it worse

Can you? Graphs are bold print but OP can't seem to suss them out.

Itelligence is not Wisdom
Wisdom is not intligence.

Thats all I came here to say.

Its only meaningful at the lower end. Basically there is a strong correlation between IQ and success at low levels and the correlation continuously breaks down the higher it gets. At so called genius level its basically noise.

The wrong assumption here is that IQ correlates with Net worth at all... We live in a society were low IQ athletes and musicians can become rich... much richer than for instance people in STEM.

Look at people with the highest average IQ out of all available university subjects. These are usually found in Math and Physics, which also have the lowest amount of women (kek). However, these subjects usually do not automatically result in a high net worth, especially when scientists usually have a shit salary compared to the degree they have.

The average IQ for engineering or medicine in the US is roughly 10 points below that of a physicist, however the former two have a higher average net worth, especially medicine in the US. Having a high IQ does not automatically mean that you strife towards high material compensation.

What IQ will give you, on average, are more choices in life to pursue what you want as most things are easier for you.

Attached: 1505839406421.jpg (1000x834, 189.81K)

and there's many forms of both

Why do you prefer the average over the raw data? That table of averages of yours has less information than the raw data.

Attached: 15(1).jpg (540x555, 41.85K)

It means IQ tests work at the very low end. Because they are tests for mental retardation. Not for general intelligence or genius.

If they didn't measure intelligence, leftist academia wouldn't feel urged to "tweak" the tests to boost the girl scores to give the illusion that the mean IQ of girls is the same as the mean IQ of boys.

So IQ is not in fact pseudoscience, cool. Low IQ is, as you state, highly predictive of individual failure.

Do you think that low IQ is also predictive of societal failure?

Attached: 1576606687482.jpg (1024x774, 152.8K)

It's illegal to test black people for I.Q. scores in California.

IQ is bunk
Flynn effect
Also Jordan Peterson loves IQ so take what you will from that

Attached: 1570579746541.jpg (350x303, 18.66K)

It means retards are retards and there is an official test for retardation and retards tend to do very poorly in life. But you knew that.

How does that dataset regress, anyway?

You’re an idiot. There may not be a positive statistical correlation between linebacker weight and income, but unless you’re 230lbs you don’t have a snowballs chance of being a linebacker.

Even the literal kike OP admits that IQ is real.

Right, IQ is real. Low IQ people tend toward failure and low IQ societies tend toward failure. This is standard Yas Forums doctrine.

Ok, so even if they're only remotely accurate at the low end of the distribution then the most damning conclusion of IQ research still holds which is that 15% of the country (50 million people) are too stupid to work the till at a fucking McDonald's

Slide it

Attached: 1578515519188.jpg (1024x1024, 79.63K)

I.Q. is highly dependent on race and the evolutionary requirements of the ethnic group. Example african tribes have an easy cyclical life that never required them to even invent the wheel so no reason for adaptation. Meanwhile in northern Europe where the ground is frozen solid and the winters are long, you have to think ahead to survive. Requiring adaption to plan ahead and not rely on impulse.

Attached: 1582379000594m-1.jpg (1024x905, 132.88K)

Stop the trickery.
IQ TESTS at least the real ones are based on scientific findings, acting like they aren't real is just a baseless trick...

If you're gonna say it's pseudo science then all our psychological studies and biological studies would be meaningless.

Don't fall for their tricks bro, they are disguise in this forums, start noticing them.

>owns a ranch
>that somehow makes him unsuccessful
retard macaco alert

by quadrant:

[trust fund babies] [entrepreneurs]

[debt serfs] [artists and teachers]

Yeah no shit it falls apart with respect to income at higher iqs. Do you think Diogenes was a high earner of Greek society? He was effectively a hobo. But he chose that. High iq individuals choose their fates for the most part.
Anyway, this is still good justification for getting rid of niggers so I don't know what point you're trying to bring up? Sage for stupid thread

60 IQ is mental retardation.

So why are blacks statistically low end? Somalia is 60 IQ.

Iq tests pattern sensitivity, which is as best a very little part of intelligence.

JUST

People think High IQ = success and money. desu the higher the IQ the higher the chances that you are a Joo or you are functioning as one. That's the truth.

>FUCK KIKES
>I LIKE KIKE TECHNOLOGY

Even better, that 15% correlates very strongly with race - niggers make up a hugely disproportionate part of that 15%. Low IQ correlates with failure, poverty, violence, and last but not least, being a fucking nigger. Again this is standard/pol/ doctrine OP. Why, you ask? Literally the next post: .

You act like this hasn't been discussed 6,000,000 times before, that Taleb's frank idiocy hasn't been dissected by anons since he first pressed the post button. But what about high IQ failures you say? Well user here has the answer for you. Try to imagine that the world has more than one variable, OP.

Any other questions or are two paragraphs of redpills enough for today?

Ted Kazynsky had an IQ of 160
Thing is, Moshe, money aren't everything.

>muh pattern recognition
high IQ is like seeing the world in full color while normies focus on running their mouths about gossip bullshit and getting paid for it.
high IQ won't give you much advantage in modern globohomo society, especially when you're targeted for having that high IQ as a European descendant

Tesla was onto secret technology that the government was trying to suppress.

IQ gives you options. You can choose to jew your way to riches, you can choose to live in a shack and mail bombs to airlines. Low IQ takes away your options.

this nigger kicks a ball and earns $500 million every year for it
srlsly

Attached: neymar-19022020112811112[1].jpg (660x360, 44.32K)

I agree, IQ has nothing to do with intelligence, despite the name. its archaic and invented by white europeans for a time when mechanical engineering skills were highly important.

btw I have a (real tested) IQ of 140 and make 95K/yr as an engineer, so im not just butthurt.