What rights should people have?

what rights should people have?

Attached: 1424375986456-1.jpg (539x385, 26.02K)

None

throw rocks at people they don't like

Is there any nation in the world where gun ownership is "banned"?

both in image are retarded
op is retarded

even in north korea gun ownership is legal for military men

I think hunting and collecting are allowed throughout the world too

EDGY

maybe not but here in the USA it is a RIGHT not a privilege

all/none

but rights arent respected in the usa

Post nose.

Sure, but the NFA has been in force since 1934. Rights are what you're willing to kill to protect, and it's obvious almost no one is that excited about the Second Amendment.

What does that mean in practice?

i have a big nose but im not jewish

Sure you aren't, Chaim.

Any and all rights they're willing and able to enforce with violence.

In CA it's not technically banned. Just infringed upon to a point where most people won't normally bother.

i wish i was desu

all of them

This. Being unwilling to hang our public officials is why we no longer have a meaningful first or second amendment.

>i wish i was desu
Does that make you Chinese or Turkish?

The right to mind your own business.

Any man of any race with an IQ over 130 should be able to live in agreement with libertarian values. Anyone below that threshold should be executed or made to work slave labor.

nope

based

The khazars larp, and the Chinese admit they want to emulate the kikes, so there aren't any other options left, nobody but them wants to be jewish.

America should get rid of free speech but only if you have an opinion

im a jewaboo

Attached: kel.jpg (200x200, 10.74K)

Attached: 435.jpg (717x880, 88.49K)

i didnt vote for him

You’re an ancap.
Everyone should have either unlimited rights, or no rights at all.

rights?

an infinitely absurd concept supremely insulting to human intellect and dignity

it implies you can discretize freedom
or have a whitelist of freedom

it is cancerous and direct from the pits of hell

sometimes freedom is used in a bad way, to harm

thats not freedom

how so?

you need to look up freedom

freedom = possibility = ability

In most countries it's not really banned, but you need to undergo a shitload of tests to get a gun. Not like in the US, where you walk into Walmart and buy one.

You need to be 18 to post here

Only the right to private property. This will be enforced by the government.

Shartmart doesn't even sell guns anymore, ever since that El Paso fiasco.

nope
freedom is unfettered choice
when it can fetter another's choice (their freedom)
then that same removal of freedom is taken from all
then it is not freedom
which is why harm is not freedom
cannot be
it is utter self contradictory because it self defeats in absolute terms
that is a paradoxical statement at best

so:
freedom includes all except harm
(actually, specifically the INITIATION of harm/force because sometimes it must be used in defense against those whom have started it)

None, you can't prove that rights exist.

Attached: 2jwvuzxqbcs31.jpg (600x645, 72.63K)

Strange how I was looking at them there today.
It’s not a simple walk in and walk out process like the media makes you want to think.

Rights are innate, they do not come from any document. The right to defend yourself exists everywhere humans exist, and is not dependent on a legal document. That's why it's called a right.

see
there are not ever have been nor can be any such thing

there is only freedom which is the same for every person ever or there is nothing

Sort of right, except that nonwhites aren't people.

meh
they can produce fertile offsrping
unfortunately
different subspecies and all that

it all boils down to property

Really? My shartmart completely got rid of their guns/ammo section. I thought it was a nationwide thing.

my walmart still has guns

nope
it boils down to the only pillar that there is of all civilizaton:
CIVILITY
you may not aggress (initiate force) against any other nor may any other against you, ever

thats all absurd sophistry
no matter how many have repeated/believed it for however long

see:

nope
you cannot have civility without property