>light exists at all points between its source and destination simultaneously
Isn't this the argument between particles and waves? Things get fucky when you go quantum.
you can't go faster than the speed of light
Caleb Ross
Aaron White
two cars in a 25mph head on collision does not equal a 50mph head on collision
Joseph Jackson
>.99999999999999999999
that's not even 1%, fucking burger-tier education
Josiah Ward
Y tho?
Jace Myers
>you can't go faster than the speed of light
I cannot, but it is probably possible. No one knows for sure, because no one tried it.
Daniel Harris
It's true it should only be half energy of a 50 mph collision but he is interested in the relativistic sum of velocities not energy
Jaxon Roberts
Atomic clocks would exhibit the same exact effect if light was a wave in a medium. They are electromagnetic devices that would experience a slowdown. The math is literally the same, but you interpret it either as time as a physical dimension changing, or as a physical device experiencing interference in its mechanism. It's literally a nothingburger.
You say my analogy is incorrect because you assume that Einstein's interpretation of Michelson Morley is correct. If he was wrong, which he almost certainly was, and Maxwell and just about everyone else was right, then my analogy is correct.
>Inb4 null result, inb4 Einstein never heard of Michelson morley, inb4 muh gps
Colton Lewis
>it is impossible to measure the one way speed of light, by definition, without discovering a medium of transmission faster than the speed of light to take measurements with
I suddenly feel less alone on this universe.
The only known speed limit of the universe is measurement,
Isaac Robinson
We should build intergalactic cannons that can launch these bots into space instead of building shuttles and bothering with fuel.
Dominic Jenkins
>Things get fucky when you go quantum.
That is because it is all fake and gay.