You could be here. Yet you choose to live in a meatgrinder animal farm that is the city. Why?

You could be here. Yet you choose to live in a meatgrinder animal farm that is the city. Why?

Attached: 1522__880.jpg (880x586, 165.38K)

I've been trying to move someplace like that my whole life. Everyone who lives there is independently wealthy or has someone sending them money from the city.

Because every stage of life is different.
I can assure young people of the village hust would want to move to the city, old people in the city want to move to the village.

Money.

That place is dilapidated bruh.
There's little villages like that where I live in WA but they are religious or culty like the Wicker Man.

Attached: naught_thee_bee.jpg (300x168, 9.37K)

Not everybody has money.

City life isn't my preferred choice. Unfortunately the system is designed and set up in such a way as to make it extremely difficult to get out of the city once you're in it. Not impossible, mind you, just very difficult.

I'm working on it. I'm gonna escape and get my own little rural property eventually.

Attached: spYZqCA.jpg (960x960, 147.59K)

Owning small properties costs less over time than paying rent.
The reality is that most city-born citydwellers had parents or grandparents that were retarded and never picked up some land, or hated their kids and told them to fuck off forever while selling their home for a round of expenses at the last phase of their life.

No jobs out there.

The kikes are trying to get everyone out of these hamlets and into cities so they can control them. That's what Agenda 21's about. Look into it.

I kind of do live there. You retards are fucked.

Attached: IMG_5511.jpg (3264x2448, 1.72M)

I didn't asked to be born in this hellhole I'm currently living.

>88

Heil Hitler too brother

This is Georgia... comfy mountains but third world basically

CHECKED

Because I’m not a blacksmith or goat herder.

Coz they’re going to be the main jobs in places like that.

>not wanting to be a comfy blacksmith or goat herded

Correct, you are a redpilled individual.

Checked

You can't just get up and move to zermatt, you need a livelihood or a big bag of cash, then you have the small village mentality to overcome. Don't be fooled by a pretty picture, you won't be accepted there.

Sure i will. I will make a hut on the outskirts. I'm a very polite person, they will like me before long.

Attached: su0d4wc2end31.jpg (750x1050, 101.52K)

That village isn't even in Europe

imagine how slow their internet speeds are, if they even have internet. no thanks

I need a job nigger

>1188
How'd you'd know I'd like to?

true, looks pretty third-worldish

Could I though? When's the last time a home went on the market in that village?

You fool. I live in a place like this and i have fantastic accès to internet. Nature + wifi +4G = dream

Rate my home

Attached: ORG_DSC06023-1500x1000.jpg (1500x1000, 363.17K)

no you can't

that belongs to Georgian ethnostate - no euros, jews, niggers and sandniggers allowed

based and checked

Because people in the country get mutated killer influenza from animals.

comfy user

Ushguli, Svaneti

it's funny they market it as the highest altitude village in Europe and that wouldn't be true even if it was 5 miles further north (thus making it technically Europe) because there's a (slightly) higher village somewhere in Dagestan (which is geographically in Europe, but is mudslime realm)

There is tons of unoccupied land in the US and it's pretty cheap. You could buy some land and start a homestead. I'm sure you could do it if you really wanted to user.

Attached: HyderALASKA.jpg (1500x1001, 380.25K)

>wanting to live in rural Australia

kino/10

Checked and based
I thing the best thing to do if you want to live in a place like that is buy some cheap land and start a homestead.
Awesome user! Got more pics?

Attached: St-Chely-du-Tarn.jpg (1024x683, 399.3K)

I would love to live in a valley like that but alas I neither have the means nor money to migrate to one. Philippines doesn't have any like that sadly.

Looks comfy, can I come stay for a while?

Fiber optics.

No

Attached: IMG_20200320_132030.png (1831x1080, 798.63K)

Do you live there full time? How much did you pay for the land/house?

Attached: 1569889911708.jpg (2560x1440, 1.26M)

I live in the city and despise it. I can't make a living doing what I do in a small town.

Villages suck tho. Shit infrastructure, no actual jobs, most people are old, gypsy ghettos that would love to burglar you when you're not home, neighbour decides to raise 50 cows or sheep next door and you have nothing to do about it, but to enjoy the smell and noise. They might look good on pictures, but they're not good to live in.
My goal (if/when I actually have a family) is to have a house in a 50-100k sized city and some land in a nearby village. I think you can get the positive things of both the city and village life that way.

What do you do for a living? You can always save money, buy some cheap land and start a homestead. You'll probably end up being happier that way.

Attached: 1559519335962.jpg (3872x2592, 3.72M)

It used to be the other way around, the poor lived in the country and the wealth in the city.

Now living in the country is a luxury like having a million dollar mansion oddly.

Private farm > villages

Would love to live in a rural place far from cities. The problem is finding non-degenerate rural neighbors and not getting Ruby Ridge'd.

Considering USA desu

Land as property was always granted through a Feudal title and still is, only that nobody works for the owner anymore.

In Feudal times we got to live in the country because we were both the employees and tenants of the landlord.

If it was to happen again, what incentive could there be for a company town or company village in the country in today's times?

Technically if you own a plot of land in the country you are the same thing as a feudal noble, not a peasant living off the land and paying some rent.

The government only gives you a title to be lord of the land, not the same right as peasants did to live off it and live or die depending on success/failure.

no it's fucking not you dumb nigger
people that are rich get a hose in the country side for recreation purposes not to make money you dumb slut

Its a similar system of slavery to the Romans, you need a Feudal title as a nobleman recognized by the government in today's world still to be able to live on the land.

Only this time they have no use for tenants that work for them.

Its the 'Freedman' system that the Romans had combined with the fact Feudal titles for land are still a thing.

Only that they're purchasable and a luxury like having a mansion.

Any nobleman who probably fails to grow his crops alone is not doing to die for starvation and is probably going to be insured.

Our freedom to live off the land and either fail or succeed from our work in the supposed 'dark ages' (Which was a semi-golden age in reality) is now gone.

I was talking about life in the 700s to 1600s, not in 2020.

Have you ever been to Mestia ? They would kill us white folk if we tried to live up there.

Either way, living in the countryside is a luxury now and the thing has been reversed.

The poor who are trying to work to survive don't live in the country and work for a landlord anymore.

No longer having the freedom to succeed and live or fail and die from starvation like their ancestors because they need a title.

Recreation purposes? You just proved my point, also show us examples of farmer - landlords that need peasants to work for them without automated farming.

Its not a thing is it today.

There are lots of people who would like to live as a 'dirt poor peasant with a house/hut he built himself working to survive in the countryside'.

So where can you start if you want that without having a feudal title to the land?

Or sleeps out in the wilderness at night where he is exposed to rain and cold while being made to work for a landlord*

>Georgian ethnostate
The one being bought by Chinese and Iranians, as we speak?

Ah you're an inexperienced urbanite then
no wonder you fetishize living in the country so much

If it was the way that old Feudal or Bronze Age people did where they could stay on and work the land without a title then yes I guess people could fetishize.

Your point is right in modern times but if it was still back then it wouldn't have been.

You do realize there are people who would be willing to sleep in the mud outside exposed to rain, cold and insect bites if they got to stay on land and work it without needing a landed title of nobility?

I don't think any villages owned by a landlord that makes people work for him exist today.

you're drunk Vova

btw, how many of your acquaintances have recently died of common flu or 'natural causes' lately?

Nice ad hominem, Zurab. All my acquaintances are fine, thank you very much.

Romans slaves fetishized about being 'Freed men' who had the right to not work for their urban society. Its the same thing today but in a different way, Feudalism was a brief break from something similar to today's life. They called it 'dark age' despite the freedom.

It was just a bunch of mercenaries asking you to farm and give them food in exchange for protection, while not caring about anything you do.

If PMCs take over and governments go I guess that golden age could return.

So being a freed man was a kind of property right (Title granted by the government) to certain things that a slave did not own etc etc.

wew

>Nice ad hominem

speaking of logical fallacies, you started it by poisoning the well.
Yes, there are (there were, to be more precise) Chinese, Iranian and Russian investors in this country since but that is because unlike you we have no natural resources to enrichen our economy.
The good thing about current events is that it's a wakeup call for our government that tourism and foreign investments alone won't do it and its suicidal to be dependent on them

That being said I wonder if Feudalism can be jumpstarted again?

A private military corporation has a military base if its allowed to exist in countries, in which there is a contract where you can grow food in exchange for being allowed to live off the land.

The employees of the PMC or private security get to have food for free while the people living there get to keep as much is allowed for being alive, and in return get to live in the country as many people want.

Fpbp

this is heaven, I envy you lucky son of a bitch

because it's expensive. You need a source of income as well that allows you to be anywhere in the world, most people don't have that luxury. You are forced to work and live in the city because that's where the government decides you live. To buy a piece of land in lets just say rural america and actually live there and have the property, At minimum you need 10,000 to build some sort of housing or shelter, and internet to get your income to pay for food, property taxes etc. This idea of living out on your own land and living a free life is only reserved to those who are already have a big sum of money like 100-1 million dollars. It's a complete fantasy to think someone can just buy a property and move somewhere, Because if so how will they support themselves without money. At the minimum you need 3000-5000$, And that's if you are going to be living in a tent outside hunting squirrels and living off the land. You need at least 10,000$ to make a little building or some sort of shelter that has utilities and internet.