Prove me wrong

3 people Yas Forums unanimously supports

Ron Paul
Martin Luther
Adolf Hitler

Attached: A7E70E21-57D8-4356-AC1E-7921E6259638.jpg (1480x833, 503.82K)

I hate Ghandi. I'll tell you that.

I hate all of them except Hitler.

I'm generally OK with this.
I'd add Evola.

Thoughts on Strasser and Rohm?

You might be a fag

Attached: Ron_Paul,_official_Congressional_photo_portrait,_2007.jpg (1189x1491, 928.23K)

>Ron Paul
who
>Martin Luther
gay
>Adolf Hitler
failure

>inb4 catholic reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeing

Attached: 1559898189250.jpg (1063x1178, 127.7K)

Ron Paul was a lukewarm, moderate who never accomplished anything.

And his stupid little "Love Revolution" was the gayest, weakest shit I've ever seen.

Libertarian fags are just as pozzed as mainline conservatards.

Attached: rp12-ron_paul_revolution_1.jpg (1800x1800, 125.1K)

Attached: cathofags.png (1700x1353, 264.14K)

Look up "overton window"

George Washington
Ghengis Khan
Big Tiddied Goth GF's

Thomas Jefferson, Vlad Tepes and Caesar Augustus

>No opinion Ron Paul
>Love Martin Luther
>Hate Adolf Hitler

Dont know much about strasserism, its a very niche ideology.

I know what the fuckin' Overton Window is, jackass. Fuck playing their game. Fuck optics. That shit is so fuckin' weak. Where did it get Ron Paul? Where has it gotten any of us?

Extremism is the answer. Extremism gets things done. Fuckin' lukewarm, moderates are honorary kikes.

Attached: quote-do-you-want-total-war-if-necessary-do-you-want-a-war-more-total-and-radical-than-anything-joseph-goebbels-93-42-75.jpg (850x400, 66.08K)

Overton window, something we've been losing for the past few decades.

Washington was a mason. So was Franklin.

Martin Luther is pretty chill, and he clearly hated Jews, but there is a notable Catholic community on Yas Forums that disagrees with you. So definitely not unanimous.

Theyre nupol

Attached: ekubvmgwwaazlvi.png (703x534, 247.42K)

Ask me how I know that you're either Paraguayan or Bolivian, you nigger

Attached: Ludwig Fahrenkrog - Der Sonnenmensch.jpg (406x656, 116.69K)

I dont support Hitler

Ron Paul and Dr King are based

Martin Luther was responsible for atheism, so no, he is kike tier

Fuck Ron Paul
Fuck Martin Luther
Fuck Adolf Hitler

Op is an eternal faggot

Martin Luther fucked over Europe over the actions of a single corrupt priest. Screw him.

Dr Paul you idiot. Show some respect.

>Martin Luther is responsible for atheism

Attached: +_b8059ec35686692d2a9db3907752be08.png (960x730, 151.18K)

Seething papist

Attached: 1555730588159.png (1845x1080, 1.26M)

Martin Luther was an unironic spiritual semite

Before martin luther common people could't read the Bible, and when they did, they found out indulgences weren't in it.

Luther was an asd

Point to the verse in the Bible that says "sola scriptura."
Are you calling Christ a liar when He told Peter that the gates of hell would not prevail against the Church He ordered Peter to found?

martin luther - broke the western church and started a European civil war that killed millions
adolf hitler - broke the peace of versalies and stared a European civil war that killed millions
ron paul - erm….

What does Sola Scriptura mean to you?

Ride the Tiger was the most apathetic and pretentious drivel I've read in awhile. His closing thesis isn't even "enjoy the collapse". It's more like "ha, there is no collapse. Everything you think is valuable is actually shit."

No thanks.

>European civil war that killed millions
This is a meme. 30 Years War was never about religion.

Ron Paul is an idealist who's entire game rests on the cult of personality.
Martin Luther was a disgusting, disgusting man.
Adolf Hitler had no clue what to do with power distribution and destroyed any idea of eugenics and nationalism.

>martin luther
cringe

"Neither pleasure nor pain should enter as motives when one must do what must be done" is perhaps my favorite quote of all time.

And any criticism or skepticism of their religion gets met with the me of the fat guy in a fedora. No discussion, just memes.

How so? Because he suggested people read the Bible for themselves?

The Apostles wrote that, not Christ. We have no third party sources backing up any of the claims made in the Gospels. It's all faith-based.

>All doctrines require an explicit poof text
Trinity

>Ron Paul
not dissident enough
>Martin Luther
pisses off trad caths
>Adolf Hitler
he ultimately failed and only created his image has been used against the right wing since ww2

Fuck Martin Luther

Attached: john of austria.png (640x739, 787.56K)

protestant reformation completely destroyed Ireland since it was constantly at odds with the most powerful Empire in the world due to denomination differences. Hitler lost, and lost even more territory for Germany than versailles.

Attached: 1583760135101.jpg (738x415, 38.87K)

hitler was jewish moses figure who sacrificed europe and the german people for the jews, fuck him
martin luther was a retarded faggot who realized the church was a sham, but instead of returning to his blood he took their scripture as the base of his own spin on their semite rooted bullshit

Cope level is high in this thread

Attached: Luther.jpg (850x400, 65.92K)

but when you base your theology on what is solely written in the scriptures, then you do need proof of it explicitly written in the text. Protestants and Catholics need to stop larping in become Orthodox.

2 Tim 3:16-17 teaches the sufficiency of scripture

fuck hitler

better answer
-George Zimmerman
-Chris Dorner
-Nassim Aghdam

Atheism is just radical protestantism.

The Church affirmed the Theology of the Church Fathers. Tell me, what do you think the status and significance of Saint Mary is?
So no objective truth exists? It's all up to personal interpretation? Pathetic, no wonder atheism is growing. Shit like this is what emboldens every movement that tries to murder the faithful, "truth is whatever I want it to be, I'll never be held accountable!"
The idea that the only practices or theology that are ever feasible are that which are explicitly spelled out in the texts, while ignoring millennia of the Church's theology and teachings.

Attached: U12a1g6.png (1000x1000, 38.45K)

Ron Paul stood alone in Congress against the Federal Reserve: (((their))) greatest weapon against Man

Also Hitler is the worst of the three, and is partially responsible for the current state of the west

Adolf hitler sucked dicks of rich industrials
I support strasser because he was socialist and röhm because he sucked dicks of poorfags too

The filioque is correct and not in conflict with the original creed at Nicaea, but an expansion and improvement upon it. No thanks. You could always become Byzantine Catholic, and wait for our current garbo pope to kick the bucket.

>The idea that the only practices or theology that are ever feasible are that which are explicitly spelled out in the texts, while ignoring millennia of the Church's theology and teachings.
That is not what Sola Scriptura means.

No

Sufficiency is not the same as saying "This is it. Nothing else allowed."

>support Martin Luther
>Qué jodido hereje

Attached: images.png (485x443, 8.19K)

>partially responsible for the current state of the west
>tf
>tp
>blaming Hitler

Attached: 1584635690725.jpg (675x276, 17.77K)

>Bashar al-Assad
>Vladimir Putin
>Viper

Attached: Rock Up.jpg (280x280, 25.71K)

Sola scriptura isn't "this is it. Nothing else allowed."

Fuck fuck fuckin fuck

Martin luther invented liberalism

Objective truth absolutely exists, and it requires objective sources. For example, we know that both Abe Lincoln and JEsus Christ existed, because their are multiple third party sources to back up first person accounts.

But let's imagine if a group of Lincoln's close friends said they saw him sprout wings and fly around a civil war battlefield shooting lasers out of his eyes. Needless to say, I'd need some third party sources to verify it as objective truth.

Attached: prot marriage.jpg (2084x1362, 708.11K)

Cherry picking doesn't change the data

Those are "mainline Protestants"

Attached: support_for_gay_marriage_by_religion.png (350x478, 141.29K)

>we know that both Abe Lincoln and JEsus Christ existed
Abe lincoln: yes
Jewsus christ: no

There are a lot of faggots here who don't like Luther

>you
Not white

Attached: Proof_of_Jesuss_existence.jpg (1440x899, 223.6K)

>"mainline Protestants"
So the majority of protestants while you're in a cool-kids club of a church where you're based and redpilled n shieet; gotcha.

Attached: based.webm (1038x584, 1.65M)

No retard

Attached: pf_15.05.05_rls2_1_310px.png (310x645, 24.61K)

Rather weird
German protestants are very liberal (they even got female priests) while the catholics are conservative

Yeah?

Attached: 1579791042933.png (598x671, 324.27K)

lol why would /pol support a nigger

Yes

Exactly
Luther, Ron Paul and Hitler did nothing wrong

Who cares, the normie Catholic boomer crowd hardly know anything about Church teaching at all; my point is simple, there has not, is not, and never will be, despite public Catholic opinion, a sodomite marriage taking place in a Catholic Church, while protestant churches all over the world celebrate sodomite marriages every day.

Attached: 1491867266659.jpg (1920x1080, 148.91K)

based

>fictional books refer to similar figures
Yeah, same works for ghosts, witches and elves: someone invented it while many others copied it