When's that start?
Isn't hypersexualization of women Eugenically beneficial to society?
Liam Morris
Camden Ramirez
>Holy fuck is she built for BBC. Imagine her legs quivering as a bull pleasures her
Honest question. Do you imagine yourself to be the bull fucking that woman, or do you imagine yourself as the spectator enjoying the sight of a fragile beauty being ravaged by a beast?
>Seems to be working, user
Women will have fewer children since only a few of them will snag the top 20%. But the kids of the next generation will be only chads and staceys - prototypical Gods when you think about it. The rest of us are merely the dwarfs who build the stage on which Gods play out their game. Not bad when you think about it - as long as we get paid well to do it.
Chase Nguyen
Both
Thomas Cruz
Corona must be over, I’m seeing these threads again.
Anthony Young
>Why are women all hooking up with niggers then?
Where do you live? Where I live women don't go for niggers. In fact, the only mixed couple I find are the ones where the chick is pretty ugly or has deep psychological scars - not good mommy material anyway.
Jeremiah Stewart
Those feet
Dylan Gray
>>Since the bottom 80% of the men are impeded from passing their weak genes
>Nature defines who the 20% is
if by "nature" you mean "women following whatever social conditioning tells them is attractive"
you really, seriously trust women to actually know what the weakest 80% and objective best 20% of genes are based on their feefees and vagina tingles?
Christopher Reyes
>When's that start?
I think it's already begun with Instagram and SnapChat. Most women display their bodies for Chads to view and choose from. They all have casual sex - and if both the Chad and Stacey like each other enough - they have kids. Already begun, don't you think?
>Both
Society is not crumbling user. We're at the cusp of becoming Gods. By we I mean Americans.
Lincoln Reed
Everything is meaningless if the majority of them are having abortions and at best having kids after 30, because "YoU gO gAl, HaVe A CaReEr". At the end many of who will have kids are racemixers or landwhales desperate for dick
Hudson Bennett
>if by "nature" you mean "women following whatever social conditioning tells them is attractive"
Women like good looking men, ripped men, or rich men. Period. It's as evolutionary as it gets. Good guys don't have a place in the modern reproductive system. You have to be ruthless and well built to be an attractive mate.
>you really, seriously trust women to actually know what the weakest 80% and objective best 20% of genes are based on their feefees and vagina tingles?
If you're in the top 20%, then wooing a girl shouldn't be hard at all. Making her cum with your fingers should be second nature to you. But if you find it an arduous task, then perhaps you're not in the top 20%.