Am I a liberal?
Am I a liberal?
Other urls found in this thread:
dichotomytests.com
twitter.com
I took that retarded test and ended up in the lower green zone.
I unironically want to see every single kike and billionaire traitor machinegunned.
That test is shit.
You're economically illiterate but you overall don't want to mess with people.
Classic liberals are further right, modern liberals are higher and to the left, neoliberals are much higher and to the right. You're just a libertarian centrist.
It's not surprising it put you on the left when you seethe like a commie.
You're apart of the democratic societal slippery slope, in that sense it doesn't matter what you believe.
Literally how does one end up in the green unless you're a pot smoking hippie
nah
What do you guys think? :)
No you are a filthy centrist who typically listens to Ben Shapirino. Kys kike loving faggot
You are just retarded
No idea what this makes me
Are you redpilled on the jewish question and race?
No, i'm not.
That's NPC territory
A normal, but slightly more intelligent than the average, American.
A centrist cuck
libertarian
delusional, but fashion yourself an AnCap
Reaganite conservative
socialist
moderate social liberal
very mild conservative
No it's not. What do you count as non-NPC?
>politicalcompass
the worst test to ever exist, really if you want to actually get your hamsterwheels turning and really get a better answer on where you stand, try 8values, spekr, filtries, or 9axes. There is a metric fuckton of these all over the internet, take a bunch and average them out to see who you are
I don't know, bros. Went through a libertarian phase a few years ago but, "If men were angels, we wouldn't need government." You need something in place to make sure people who don't know better aren't (((lured))) into degeneracy or (((exploited))) financially.
Playing disco elysium is a better test and you get to mock your own shit and have fun
Dude what
My first image is a 14/88 meme
My second one isn't conservative at all, conservatives are pro-government intervention.
Not relying on others to do life for you.
1488 would be way more authoritarian than capitalistic. The person in that meme would be an extremist capitalist, but very moderate in terms of authoritarianism.
The second one is also extremely capitalistic, and also very mild on the authoritarian/libertarian spectrum.
Reaganite conservatives are pro-business conservatives - they believe liberalizing business and loosening economic regulations leads to prosperity.
Come on, none of this is hard to understand.
Ok, faggot.
Everyone relies on people and there's nothing wrong with relying on others imo.
I have no idea how I got here besides believing that corporations need restrictions on environmental damage etc. . I still consider myself nat-soc.
Maybe more NazBol or Strasserist?
Yes you are, go kill yourself.
Enjoy being wrong
Fuck off with your commie fagshit
How am I wrong?
Dont know why i always get this result.
Just because im more "for the people" instead of (((economic+)))?
Because i think weed should be legal to adults? Because im not religious?
I think that my people are superior, some people should be seperated and so on.
I actually would call me somewhat NatSoc desu without wanting to get commanded in every single aspect of life and instead want the folk to live responsible on their own terms while having the feeling of duty to endure in hardtimes for their people
I was halfway to the right, on the line between blue and purple
What am I?
How'd I do
Your result leads me to think you're a very moderate liberal.
Maybe look into whether or not the way you imagine yourself to be reflects your actual views.
you are a faggot
It's because your political views were centre-left just 10 years ago. The "centre" today is the radical far left of your youth.
I got the same and believe the same as you, there is that 8values one that got it spot on though, unless of course the left/right divide on that compass is not on social issues but in fact only economical.
You're the only person here whose results actually reflect right wing authoritarian or near-fascistic/reactionary views. You decide whether that's good or bad.
Think of humanity like a meta-organism. If it has centralized intelligence, a single bullet ends it all. If the meta-organism is instead a conglomerate of fully capable independent cells, it is virtually impossible to destroy. Relying on china for your manufacturing means when china is fucked, you are now fucked. Which is what's happening.
Don't know how to feel about this one chaps.
I went in a straight line from mid purple to mid red in a timespan of ten years. Very odd, because it doesn't feel like my opinions have actually changed.
Nah, I don't see communism working and understand that workers are better cared for under a strong nation.
I think women belong in the home and religious values should be instilled in schools (went to private school myself).
When I last took it around two years ago it was same spot left/right but two or three blocks into the libertarian hemisphere. Thanks for showing me the light, Yas Forums.
You're a retard faggot, kys
SAGE
What do you even mean by that?
MAGA
Yes
Reagan was a pro-government spending, and exacerbated the problem of monopsony in the US, as well as enabled and pressured the war on drugs and passed sweeping gun restrictions. The Reaganite sense of "deregulation" is nonsense when put in contrast with their moralistic crusades that made them giant spenders, and relentless in outsourcing. They had high praise for weaker regulations, except in the case of workers, and in every aspect they could have greatly made a difference, particularly in taxation and the individual, they would stand on platforms praising the individual above all else, but gladly steal from them all that is the individual's choice and ability to operate in the market as a competitor. It allowed for entrenched elite businesses to become more entrenched and elite with weaker restrictions on them, but often with the cost of more prohibitive barriers to entry for any competitor.
Also
>Conservative
I can assure you I do not want to conserve.
Do this and let's see if you're economically retarded.
Just retook it. I hate giant corporations, but I don't like gibs either. What am the hell am I?
dichotomytests.com
Do this
How Reaganites perceive themselves don't necessarily line up with the impacts of Reagan's actual policies. I agree that Reagan basically continued and exacerbated a system of socialism for the rich and capitalism for everybody else, defrauding the public to help major corporations. But regardless, your results on this test reflect very mild conservative positions, coupled with extreme capitalism - in other words, the pro-business conservative camp.
If you're a reactionary, there's no indication of it based on your results on this test.
It means what it says, retard.
r8
every American is some form of liberal
I would probably say I'm politically autocratic, fascist, and isolationist. I guess this lines up economically.
Bitch
Socialism for the rich is socialism for the public. It's a restricted market that prevents capitalistic practices.
The problem with "Reaganite conservatives" is the latter half, conservative, they are more than happy to conserve and preserve the "Legacy" they inherit, meaning whenever it pushes three steps left, they push one step right and declare it a victory. Being capitalistic to this degree is radical, revolutionary (Not in the commie way), and most certainly not conservative in any part of the world, because it wishes to drag the policy far and away from anything anyone was born into at this point in time. Not themselves, their parents, or their grandparents. It does not want to conserve, it wants to usurp and reform.
Post actual political tests.
Well then...
>Progressive tax
I honestly never understood "fascists" that support a progressive tax. Shit's leftist trash.
Disgusting
At least you aren't a bureaucrat.
I see what bureaucrats are doing to Germany. How could I?
>laissez faire capitalist
>thinks he can call others disgusting
>Letting the inferior flounder and fail by stripping away malinvestments
>Not Yas Forums's dream come true while being economically stable
How are you a fascist but let super rich override you
NatSoc is a market based on labor not capital stupid
Mainly because money kind of loses some of it's value and utility when you have LOTS of it. If you're living basically paycheck to paycheck, losing 40% of your income to taxes is way more devastating than it is for someone making $200,000.