WHITE ETHNOCENTRISM

thank you user

Incorrect

even just white identity would be better than what we have now; but ideally, yah, it would be more specific anglo/germanic/nordic (WASPs)

you're welcome. the time limit to bump your own thread varies, but it's generally 10-20 minutes after your last post. when the board is slower (night time in the usa), the time to self-bump is lower, generally around 10 minutes

Italians are arab rapebabies.

Ideally, i agree. But is it better to start from encouraging specific ethnic identity? maybe in Europe, definitely not here though. Gotta start with getting whites to group up, at least in Aus

This "White" terminology is what the enemy refers to us as.

It makes no difference whether or not you see an Italian as "White" or a Slav as something else. Every other race sees Europeans as "White": Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, whatever.

Nope. Some admixture due to war time rape and out-breeding among the masses does not exclude an ethic group from being European.

Whites aren't an ethnic group, they're a caste. They can't be "bred out of existence".

I'm pretty sure war is the only thing that will do it now. The hard fought lessons of our ancestors were erased from public memory, people only learn and adapt through pain and violence. White people will either go to war or slip quietly into the night.

I definitely prefer the general term 'European'. European-Australian is something i say irl. I don't say British Australian, it just doesn't have the same ring to it.

nice try, I only eat faggot b8.

shit

This is their worldview, they determine what it is for all non-Europeans.

Attached: 1578977560031.png (967x784, 421.32K)

Ultimately you may be right. But wars don't spring up out of nothing.

Typical commie nonsense

yes, I think so. better to just start with whites

The "white" caste system is based on fiction and will be overthrown, not "bred out of existence".

"Australian" refers to an extension of Europe. There's no such thing as a "European-Australian", an Australian is basically another European tribe that resides away from the majority of other European tribes.

There's also no such thing as an Asian-Australian, and an African-Australian, or a Jewish-Australian. They're Mongoloids and Negroids seeking to genocide you and they start with ideological warfare (such as diluting the meaning of an "Australian", or an "Italian", or a "Greek" or whatever with they apply their hyphenated bullshit to.

>being bred out of existence
Shut up retard. By the way whites are some of the most autosegregated people there are (behind maybe niggers because no one wants to live with niggers). And whites racemix the least of ALL racial groups including jews

Absolutely. So how do we increase white in-group behavior? The IOTBW posters were excellent.

Caste systems are almost always determined by genetics, and only really cause conflict or dissatisfaction in a non-homogeneous society. Ethnonationalism is the answer.

>And whites racemix the least of ALL racial groups including jews

Whether or not this is true, a single White mixing is far more devastating than a single non-White mixing because there are so few of us relative to everyone else, and it doesn't help being the single most desired race to fuck or kill. We don't have the net population to spare, everyone else does.

The power imbalance is to great for any revolution. Communism, facism, nationalism, ethnic preservation. If white people started defending them selves today we would find ourselves the victims of the bloodiest genocide in the history of humanity. First every nation in power needs to be corrupted into weakness, then made to choke on bad policy untill it can be over thrown. White people are seen as disposable fodder in the elites money machine, and an overly expensive version of the same cheep labor of other races. We will be replaced with low cost true wagecucks sooner through blood, or later through breeding.

Ok, but if i say I'm just European irl, in australia, people think its weird. Gotta be realistic about this. I see your point though.

You need to educate yourself on birth rates, mass immigration, demographic replacement and The anti-white media agenda.

Great response.

No they aren't determined by genetics, there's no evidence for that, historical or otherwise. They're caused by private property.

One of the best ways to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children is simply to have one-on-one conversations with friends can family, people who love you and will seek to understand you rather than ostracize you, and try to get them on board with the cause. This can help: it's a basic rundown of the arguments in favor of white nationalism, and it includes a list of sources for further reading.
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=11996139495025144770

Attached: Cover.png (823x1041, 82.94K)

this is a reminder to not respond to communist slide posters

stay safe anons

"I can't argue so don't respond!"

Incorrect.

well-timed reminder

ALSO I am OP, samefagging with different device

Great post. I find this extremely difficult, frustrating and often fruitless. But it has worked for me on one occasion, and that makes it worth it. I would add, NOT to start with anything related to old ideologies (natsoc, fascism etc.) The enemies have won that battle for now, all old-school ideologies like that are too difficult to redeem in the eyes of the masses.

>Ok, but if i say I'm just European irl, in australia, people think its weird. Gotta be realistic about this. I see your point though.

Most Australians don't even have the word "European" in the common vocabulary. They're not racially aware and that's just the way it is. We have some patriots, but they still appear to put country before race.

I don't know if any genetic awakening can occur here, looks like we're done for as an extension of Europe. Just don't have the numbers of people who aren't retards.

And using the term "European-Australian" plays into the trap of politics whereby everyone else has their own hyphenated-Australian identity. There's only one Australian, and those are Europeans, they're one and the same, there's no hyphen to it. Asians, Aboriginals, Jews whatever are not Australian.

Hey OP! Good thread. A lot of it comes down to who you want your target audience to be and what ideas you want propagated.
The main thing is power and a clear global cooperative. You need a tangible goal you're striving towards. This idea of rising populism is the best we have going on now. It starts with academic justification, followed by a clear vision. This is possible for White Ethnocentrism but it hasn't been pioneered by someone of relevance (what it means today). Hope this helped!

Its absolutely correct. They didn't even know about genetics when the racial system was invented, so they used colourism.

my race is my nation

this is a reminder to not respond to communist slide posters

stay safe anons

Attached: download (1).jpg (474x494, 30.98K)

I find saying European-Australian is a good way to get people to at least start thinking racially. But you're right, I've had very little success actually waking people up. And I also agree that Australia may be lost.

>And using the term "European-Australian" plays into the trap of politics whereby everyone else has their own hyphenated-Australian identity. There's only one Australian, and those are Europeans, they're one and the same, there's no hyphen to it. Asians, Aboriginals, Jews whatever are not Australian.
This was great to read and very true, even if we can't say it IRL. Heartbreaking, got me right in the feels user.

Thanks for participating, and a great post. Academic justification is definitely underrated, even by me because i hate academics. But it is definitely an important front.

>So how do we increase white in-group behavior?

like with anything, we start small

>What is clear is that, for a start, people who are serious about addressing the problem of technology must establish systematic contact with one another and a sense of common purpose; they must strictly separate themselves from the "adversary culture"; they must be oriented toward practical action

>One has to collect a handful of strongly committed people of the right sort. Once that small nucleus has been formed, it should be easier to attract additional adherents.

>Turnbull observes that "few of us would be willing to sacrifice" modern "achievements," "even in the name of survival"

>the conditions of modern life are conducive to laziness, softness, and cowardice.

>An effective revolutionary movement will have to adopt...the hard values of primitive societies, such as skill, self-discipline, honesty, physical and mental stamina, intolerance of externally-imposed restraints, capacity to endure physical pain, and, above all, courage.

This is accurate. A nation is not a piece of land, it's not an imaginary border, and it's not an idea on a piece of paper. A nation is a group of people, and you don't help those people by replacing them.

They used healthy, natural, racial instincts. You cannot argue your way out of racial reality, it is ingrained, powerful, and beautiful. But I appreciate the civility.

quoted text is ted kaczynski, btw. of course I'm not suggesting anything illegal or revolutionary in any antagonistic sense; more that we must make a revolutionary move, separate from the corrupt old order, and found a new beginning for our people

kaczynski was a brilliant phd mathematician, and altho I don't agree with his ultimate approach he is a serious thinker with insight worth considering

Absolutely, and I'm glad you posted this. Gotta keep this message, it's strong.

I've had boomers tell me there are "billions" of Europeans in the world. That's how stupid they are.

There's about 800 million "Whites", and barely 400 million West-Europeans.

Racial instincts that didn't exist until they invented them.

Great posts. So what are some realistically effective organisations in America? We have NONE here, and its a terrible, terrible reality. Dissident right wing thought is just non-existent in our public sphere. Or do you covert ops like IOTBW are all we can do for now?

Racial instincts have always existed, misguided friend. Unless the jew reaches his end goal with globohomo, they always will exist

They exist in chimpanzees. They existed in the first Hominids. Racial instincts helped create the human species, humans did not create racial instincts. They will always exist, and its a beautiful thing.

No they haven't. Differences have always existed, difference is the basis of contradiction, but colourism, no. That didn't come in until colonialism.

No they don't. Again, differences exist and are exploited for private property, colourism is a colonial invention.

Yeah, the racial situation, while not as catastrophic and irreversible as some black-pilled anons would have us believe, is NOT good.

I believe the global nationalist movement must eventually coalesce its objectives into recreating the UN that would allow for both limited-technological regions, and grounded with strong ethnic majorities in participating nations. Land disputes are sort of tricky. Preserving ethnic diversity (on a global perspective, by utilizing nationhood, is how I see the world best operating in the face of future uncertainties and current struggles. Of course, mental health is a big thing, tracking related externalities and holding the Government accountable is important. Ever since being a child, I've been considering what makes the healthiest mind, and I believe that ethnic diversity is a force of threat which harms creative and beneficial brain patterns. Of course I'd write it more elegantly if I was presenting it.

I think covert ops are the wrong approach, or at least, insufficient. see what kaczynski said about courage being the most important thing.

every other race self-organizes support groups by race. we can and must do the same thing.

the challenge is staying positive, calm - keeping nazi and kkk-type elements away, otherwise it will alienate most people

white defense league, something like that.

no matter how well we organize ourselves to be calm and positive, we will inevitably receive a lot of opposition from corrupt MSM and other leftist types. the best thing we can do is ignore it or dismiss it with simplicity when we're given a platform. don't legitimize, don't engage as much as possible, and don't let it discourage us from the necessary work at hand. courage

we're talking about our future here, the future of our children, our descendents; the future of our people. global war is coming soon, we must organize and separate to survive anyway

and soon

Simple, remove all women from leadership. Test all the men to make sure they have properly developed amygdalas, remove all pedos and crypto Jews (same thing).

Incorrect, racial segregation occurred in ancient India and is the reason for the caste system today. Also, race is not based on colour, it is based on genetics, behavior, and yes, overall appearance. It is an extension of tribalism which we evolved for our benefit, which has been proven by the study of our closest genetic relatives, the chimpanzee.

This is a huge part of it. Women must not lead. There are subtle ways to introduce this in your social circles too. Strangely, I find girls to be more receptive to the idea.

Well, make use of your thread here. You've got the communist (((meme flag))) trying to bait, de-rail and test. Perfect little forum to get your worldview straight.

Great post. Once there are legit white-only or white-majority groups for ANYTHING, the snowball effect will be awesome.

Another great post
>what makes a healthy mind?
i would extend this to
>what makes a STRONG mind?

They always make me uncertain. Not about my worlview, i am solid as a rock in that. But about whether or not they are misguided whites who need help, or are irredeemable and possibly terrible people.

T H I S

Thanks. It's all I think about and hope to accomplish in this life. That's an important point you caught, a healthy mind is defensive. A strong mind is the best defense against an unhealthy mind and is offensive, being about raising the youth and what things SHOULD be instead of what they shouldn't be. Yep, excellent point.

You may actually be right about that. It makes sense that racism would only start with colonialism due to the fact that each race was geographically segregated up until this period.

You cant realize a particular race's inferior traits if you havent been exposed to them enough to have a familiarity with the race in question. I feel that "Racial instincts" are a part of tribalism though. People naturally identify with others who share similar traits with them. This naturally leads to a tribalistic bond between similar individuals

All meme flags are Jews unless proven otherwise (which never happens anyway). 9 times out of 10 this is correct.

If they want to be absolved of a genetic constitution then they are your enemy and should be treated as such. So fuck em.

Yeah but its not "racial segregation" because of colourism. Its just old prejudice. France had a similar group of untouchables called Cagots, and by all accounts, they weren't anymore different looking than the rest of the population. People make up these categories to justify exploitation. And we aren't chimpanzees.

Just because they weren't in contact with eachother, doesn't mean the differences didn't exist. The instinct was there, waiting to help preserve the race. But be careful when labelling things inferior: we want to live and thrive among our own, we aren't hateful or arrogant.

>hope
absolutely. Having love for, and wishing to preserve ones own people will give so much value and contentment to so many lives.

It was to justify slavery. Christopher Columbus was a slaver who had discovered a new place, so he basically convinced the Queen of Spain to allow his to take over as governor and allow slavery on the basis they weren't Christian. There's no evidence other groups were any less sophisticated than us.