I don't wanna go further in the libertarian-to-altright pipeline, Yas Forums

Please, tell me there's a way to go back, this is making me suffer, i can no longer live normaly i society.
Everyday i just hope a radical group recruits me and gives me a direction to follow, society is just a big circus...

Attached: oLkdk98VgbRL_y8FNYLHqbuSOcLxlB3qQH-jw2aC1Z0.jpg (1125x1618, 194.37K)

>NOOOOOO NOT MY CENTRISMERINO! NOT THE HECKIN REGIME-PROPAGATED NORMS BOY!

Attached: soy286.png (785x731, 205.23K)

>clerical fascism
Based hue.

His left arm looks like an uncut dick haha

Just think, leftists had everything, EVERYTHING they needed in the 2000s. They had all the political power in the world, and the only people opposing them were the weakest, most pathetic opponents on earth; Libertarians. People who genuinely wanted to treat everyone the same and play the electoral game like good little citizens.

But that wasn't enough for them. Even this meek resistance to the total domination of liberalism was too much for them. So they pushed and pushed and pushed, gleefully smearing our faces in the hellscape of a future that they openly wanted to build.
And then, slowly, the once soft libertarians began to become less willing to play their stupid game. They began to embrace masculine political positions. They began to say, "Wait, what if we just killed these psychotic monsters who are trying to murder us?"

Leftists push and push and push until they turn their kosher opposition into genuine revolutionaries.

If you want truth, you'll endure the pain. You can do it

Attached: 1584387788742.jpg (725x905, 198.6K)

Based if true.

I'm still sympathetic to left libertarianism. Wish I had the Eyes of God sometimes, hah; I'd love to see if right-libertarianism actually lost their spines to fascism or if that's just some dumb meme. Libertarians get the brunt of way too much pressure sometimes.

I suck priest cock and I like it. Please tell me what to do master. I want the cummies in my tummies. Blue stripe!

Attached: somesteppy.jpg (720x477, 37.98K)

>talks about enduring pain
>posts picture of famous advocate of big government
The daddyland isn't gonna wipe you, son.

>. People who genuinely wanted to treat everyone the same and play the electoral game like good little citizens
Obviously you have ZERO clue what Libertarianism is. At all.
Protip : inform yourself first.
And no, im not gonna do that for you.

Shit meme proven wrong time and time again. Nobody libertarian turns into a leftist nazi

>one arm is bigger than the other
accurate for most anons

Attached: 1568259326815.gif (640x480, 867.79K)

>you're wrong and i won't explain why, you have to trust me blindly

I'm a fascist because I want people to stop trying to hurt my family.

Attached: stonetoss.png (998x1010, 342.38K)

The only way for you to "go back" is for you to systemically get rid of all the "redpills" you consume, and oppose what you had been.

>lost their spines to fascism or if that's just some dumb meme
It is, Nazis don't have the slightest understanding of libertarianism

*dies from corona*

>Waaaah, women and minorities became too visible and outspoken for my liking
No one cares about your sob story, fascist scum.

>everyone will agree not to have a government
>so that new ones will spring up instantly
libertarianism is a joke.

>duur, da man who gots shot marching with his bruddahs is the probwem.
You're a fucking faggot who could not survive one day if everything you've come to expect disappeared.

If you can't deal with society as it is then start teaching or volunteering instead, actually make it better rather than just sitting on Yas Forums and jerking it to 2D girls while dreaming about the revolution.

Instill good values in people, teach them to think rationally and critically about their surrounding and lead by example.

Lol, dishonest garbage.
The only reason anyone "seeks your harm" isn't because you're white, it's because you're a fucking Nazi.

>rape white children.
Ruins the meme imo.

>it's not because you're white
>it's because you want to continue being white

You literally torture men until they shoot up schools, and then beg them for sex afterwards.
It's like you're a parody of a parody of a parody.

You'll be tied to a piece of wood and set on fire before too long, don't worry.

Meme or not, that's irrelevant.
I grew accustomed to libertarian groups where people use actual argument. A good chunk of them are wrong, but at least they are still arguments.

It all started when in 2016/2017 a discussion about the political position of nazism came to the mainstream, and i realized people outside of my lolbert discussion groups don't like using arguments, just ad hominem and ad vericundiam.
And today i fucking snapped because i found out people in my country that are able to vote don't fucking know what supply and demand are.

I don't wanna be a fucking fascist, but i see no way out of this if not by violent or authoritarian means.
You don't win against a violent enemy by being pacific.

This

I was a centrist lolbertarian in 2008 and now I’m an unironic monarchist

What is "continue being white" even supposed to fucking mean.
It's not like you're gonna stop being white at any point in your life. And it's not like anyone has an issue with that.
No, what you're really bothered by is that people don't want white men to maintain total dominance over everyone else.

Theres no such thing as the alt right. There's understanding the wisdom of libertarianism and then understanding the limits of humanity's essential nature.

What. What the fuck are you even talking about, you nutbag.

>fecking feshist
man that would really suck if people were fit, healthy, fertile, and loved one another rather than your anarcho-capitalist global trade zone where everyone is a pothead, obese, and effectively infertile.

This meme is so fucking bad. Is this zoomer humour?

dude, really, libertarianism is a meme ideology

>how much for the nigger?

Anti-whites are not worth engaging and will just gaslight you and play word games endlessly

Lmao obvious kike.

>what do you mean you want to exist as a people and culture with a government that represents your collective political will

the system is literally run by zionists and capitalists who are completely disregarding whites and giving a visa to anyone who wants to take a job and enabling open borders,
but ya, "nazis" totally run the system. lmao the fuck

i have no problem with niggers; when they're their true "themselves" they're kind of honourable and based.

Are the white commies whom i hate

Attached: 1583926885007.png (510x676, 331.51K)

Don't, grow a spine and embrace the fact that being far-right is the right moral and logical to be, and that society as a whole is warped in the west. Don't become a cowardly leftist or centrist.

Attached: bernie yes.jpg (790x538, 47.42K)

>clerical fascism
Just close the Congress and make Olavo de Carvalho the mastermind of the government

Attached: CC1646FD-5D7B-4B9E-AD9A-C6FC3390EC6F.jpg (400x400, 16.55K)

The only libertarian-totalitarian pipeline is the case of "libertarians" compromising on their principles, if they ever had them in the first place.

In reality libertarianism is the soundest political philosophy in history and every single argument against it here either boils down to a strawman ("open borders", "pro gay", "jewish") or an assertion of infeasibility (ie, not an argument)
Pro white libertarianism is the ultimate solution to the great replacement. The non-libertarian alt right is a sophomoric mixture of edgy opinions and the totalitarian impulse.

Attached: 1501447448797.png (966x473, 203.27K)

>is the right moral and logical to be,
is the moral and logical thing to be*

>anarcho-capitalism is really good for securing a genetic people group and its culture
incorrect.

That's a fucking riot, you're telling me Republican/Trump shills here aren't lolberg kike slaves? Literally any mention of fixing capitalism is met with accusations of gommunism and it's absolutely retarded.

>an assertion of infeasibility (ie, not an argument)
Pottery

Attached: 1527893073211.jpg (954x932, 781.56K)

>anarcho-capitalism is really good for securing a genetic people group and its culture
incorrect.

Maybe the real pipeline is the friends we made along the way.

Attached: 1560405224236 (1).jpg (1000x1000, 250.67K)

I know the difference between neo/Hollywood Nazism and national socialism, do me the courtesy of learning the difference between lolbergs/LPs and libertarians

Attached: Ron_Paul,_official_Congressional_photo_portrait,_2007.jpg (1189x1491, 928.23K)

flip the government

Attached: 1552165768748.png (1639x666, 874.82K)

>clerical fascist
Just become a reactionary. Nazis actively persecuted and oppressed catholics and monarchists. These esoteric hitlerist schizos don't give two shits about theology or community. They just want to order people around and "react" purely on an emotional level without genuine reason.

"Mass executions" are pointless because people that can not fit into the community will die drunk and alone in a gutter anyways. Read Burke.

Attached: ipaesugbvuabvuab.jpg (500x705, 74.19K)

nut up and go through it pussy

OK, you got me interested, where can i learn more?

>Using the "not an argument" maymay
He can't make an argument because you didn't present one. At best, you stated a thesis. Burden of proof falls on you to prove that "Pro white libertarianism is the ultimate solution to the great replacement".

this libertarian pipeline to alt right really doesn't exist in the way people think.

"classical liberals" did win arguments against the idpol left because they were right about everything should be equal and fair, they won because it was a defence of white people against an increasingly aggressive and powerful movement. circa 2014-2016, beyond that with the sargon v Richard spencer debate which although muh ecelebs really stood out as a watershed moment in which large swathes of so called alt lite people realised that it wasn't the libertarian position they agreed with, just that they didn't want to be demonised by the left and turned inwards to their own identity as a source of strength.

how can one be strong against those who attack him for being something immutable like race without acknowledging the game being played.

>cuz you're a fucing GNATZEEEE
Nope, I have the same views on race and politics as the westerners who defeated the Nazis, I literally don't know what your beliefs are from but they look like a mixture of scientology, secular creationism, brown people worship, and being gay.

This, Reject Decadence, Embrace Hardship!

>"recruits me"
This is the problem with pol and the wider struggle. We are constantly stuck in a loop of educating normies trying to see if there is any diamonds in the pile of rubble. Let me do you a favor and say you never want to join or be recruited by a group now a days, especially online, unless you know every person in that group going back years.

Otherwise you're better off lonewolfing it. This is 10 times more important within nations like the US where feds and other faggots are common. My personal rule being that if you are actually going to do anything that will actually have an effect and save our people, then you should know the people you work with for 10 years, and 5 of those years shouldn't have any politics brought up, less likely for them to hide things from you. Of course if you want to do more legal things, like spreading the message, educating the ignorant, then you don't need to worry about this as much.

If you want to water down the message or through you're hat in with all the half bakes (Commies, Nazbol, Ancap, Monarchists, Libertarians) to "reach the masses" you can go ahead and join them. there are over 100 groups with 100 ideologies out there trying that approach and achieving nothing, except attacking each other on places like Yas Forums and then retreating to their circlejerks.

Attached: e123496a60c413076abd345fe8071a9aa49b3b8be24fc7aea726b4b1dbafc1bd.png (718x1024, 1.07M)

No, that's not how this works.
This is an informal imageboard. One man makes a claim, another can disagree and explain why. I'm not preparing an opening statement for an Oxford debate.

If anyone really does want a developed argument though, read this.

Attached: serveimage.jpg (333x499, 41.3K)

Meant "Throw" not "Through", and "your" not "you're".

I actually like RP a lot, I would support abolishing the fed and ending corporate subsidies as well as ending perpetual war and an overinflated military budget, etc. I'm not a libertarian though since I believe in class cooperation but I do respect some elements of it.

I really dislike Trump and his supporters, I feel like Yas Forums died in 2015-2016 because of him. Any trumptard here thinks raising taxes is literally theft (I'm sure you might agree) and that you're a communist if you support any social programs. I've never met a group of people more brainwashed by ZOG. And real libertarianism would be fine but that's not what we have now we have regulated crony capitalism so I honestly believe we should regulate it more to actually fix our fucking economy by taxing the 1% and giving everyone healthcare. It's not communism for god's sake.

Enjoy loneliness anão

Se começar a ler Olavo é um caminho sem volta.

Based and Yas Forums pilled

>This is an informal imageboard
I don't care if we're on an imageboard or in real life. Logic doesn't change. I'm not asking you to write a paper, I'm asking you to backup what you said.

Bait right? No?
>Everything I don't like is a Nazi
>That's why I'm justified in killing everything I don't like

lmao

Attached: journeyofanantifa.jpg (640x522, 29.04K)

Sudaca y de derechas. Doblemente subnormal.

Just pray to Jesus bro.

I'm happy to give a basic support. I'm only saying that I am not to be supposed wrong because some user greentexted me and said "incorrect"

The full argument is the book I posted. My opinion is that only libertarianism produces a satisfactory political philosophy to act as a moral explanation for political action, and the principles of libertarianism are conducive to the security of the race, nation, natural heirarchy, tradition, and so on.

Attached: John Locke.jpg (984x1138, 471.48K)

>Read Burke
Also Plato, Kant, Hegel, Ruskin, Coleridge and TS Eliot.

Attached: 5183OjSPoTL._SX304_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (306x499, 39.48K)

Attached: 149855387.jpg (582x781, 52.16K)

I don't have time to read an entire book tonight. Could you give me a summary of it so I can refute it (Or at least attempt to)