Will Communism ever work ?

My friends recently vandalized Marx's grave in the UK again. Check it, they shat on it.
You're welcome :)

>List of FAILED Communist States
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1922–1991)
Mongolian People's Republic (1924–1992)
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1943–1992)
People's Republic of Bulgaria (1946–1990)
People's Socialist Republic of Albania (1946–1992)
Polish People's Republic (1947–1989)
Socialist Republic of Romania (1947–1989)
Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (1948–1990)
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (1948–1992)
Hungarian People's Republic (1949–1989)
German Democratic Republic (1949–1990)
People's Democratic Republic of Yemen (1967–1990)
Somali Democratic Republic (1969–1991)
People's Republic of the Congo (1969–1992)

Provisional Military Government of Socialist Ethiopia (1974–1987)
People's Republic of Mozambique (1975–1990)
People's Republic of Benin (1975–1990)
People's Republic of Angola (1975–1992)
Democratic Republic of Madagascar (1975–1992)
Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (1978–1992)
People's Revolutionary Government of Grenada (1979–1983)
People's Republic of Kampuchea (1979–1989)
People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (1987–1991)
National Council for the Revolution (1984–1987)

Yes. It did work, look at Tito's Yugoslavia for example.

Any system a jewish NEET pulls out of his ass without the backing of any real world analysis will never work.

Now that’s fucking based

>Tito's Yugoslavia
>communist

it was "market socialism" which is barely any different from capitalism

No, a bearded rabi is not an authority on good economic policy.

Absolutely not. It's science fiction.
It has led to some wonderful innovations, of course - a mixed socialist free market is obviously the most functional system, in a post-corporate reality. Otherwise tyrants re-emerge under the guise of free trade and citizens become labor-serfs.

Marxism and communism itself should be viewed as an embarrassing and short-sighted failed cult, which gave way to better things, similar to the French revolutionary government.

As an encompassing worldview? No, but the economic elements of it can be validly applied if it's on a small scale volunteerist system or if mankind somehow finds a way to make something out of nothing (diminishes all material value to essentially negligible amounts). A big reason communism fails is because it's not just an alternative economic scheme to capitalism, but instead something more akin to a religion. Too many mass social concessions have to be made for the economic policies it posits to actually adhere to a population (no family, no monetary system, no religion, obedience over truth, obedience over autonomy, socialized distribution of interpersonal intimacy, no property, no privacy).

Maybe, in the very distant future. We don't even have capitalism working properly right now.

No fuck off

Only in Heaven where they don't need it.

fuck off back your shity land burger

yes. stalinism worked.

we gonna find out soon

Attached: ES88lZEWoAAGbZ5.jpg (1366x768, 73.34K)

what happened in the 90s?
did the NWO started?

How is Ceaușescu going?

Nicaragua - Sandinista National Liberation Front (1979 - 1990)

tell me one economic system that worked.

somewhere being dead

yeah, you should have seen the market falling from the start of that crisis. the start was in the 2005, so...

>muh co-op
>co-ops are marxist/socialist/communist only
Co-ops are alive and well in free markets, the difference is, the state is not forcing it on you, you can choose to be a part of one or not.

Attached: 3sthtj.jpg (500x500, 102.23K)

russians weren't already niggers when stalin arrived?
and after stalin's death... they had nuclear weapons, won the second world war and were rulling over half europe.
and in this particular half people are actually based, compared to the capitalist half.

At any time, as soon as the Communists understand all the charms of the traditional American system. It is enough to divide one party into "Bolsheviks” and "Mensheviks", after which the system will stand for centuries.

The proponents of communism today are supported,(and financed) by the corporations the ideology once criticised.
We've come full circle and international socialism is now in line with global capitalism

the people were slaves who were terrified of the secret police, art and philosophy (truth and beauty) were broken to the will of the state... millions were starved or worked to death to support the failed system...

no, they are not. soros&co. are financing social libertarians. social libertarians, democratic socialists, sjws etc. are not communists, socialists, nazbols etc.

No because people are inherently selfish. Human nature is a thing, contrary to retarded leftists.

>art
well, let's look at what capitalists were able to draw with their freedom.

Attached: DentroJacksonPollock.jpg (1487x768, 367.33K)

It works for China. People here will claim that China is capitalist to fit their narrative but it really isn't. Much of it's economy is state owned businesses run by government officials. They still use 5 year plans in which the central government presents vague ideas for the future and then lets local government spend money to achieve this vision. When some regions are succesfull this is upscaled to be used on a bigger scale. The Chinese elite has been investing in real estate arround the world to escape their own government claiming their assets for more than a decade now. Even the belt and road initiative is just to sink money into something because they can't secure it in state bonds on the scale because governments usually don't allow foreign governments to invest that much in their bonds.

Communism is an ideal. Ideals are not real and cannot be made real. Don't be retarded.

I'm not saying those proponents ever read a book or studied history. The corporations love useful idiots and see them as a resource

Maybe in the distant future where there is post-scarcity and humans are genetically engineered not to be able to commit crime.

Only if we get rid of Kike influence, they use Communism as another tool for dominance

Is coffee good for you?

No

have you meet the blacks ?

Based

>philosophy
let's see what capitalism gave us
youtu.be/Fav-SS0L78Q

Attached: Screenshot_2020-03-16-18-10-45.png (720x1280, 274.33K)

No.

why do you ask retarded questions user?

No. Power is zero sum, so statelessness can never work.

dershowitz once said that stalin was antisemitic.

I remember this was quite good, and from a Romanian too
youtube.com/watch?v=93IGnesL-ao

do you actually think that ussr didn't have bureaucracy?

Cockshott describes potential socialist economy. Full communism is actually completely impossible.

They perfected bureaucracy lol

USSR was only communist in the sense of (allegedly) "attempting to progress to communism." Actual end-state communism is meant to be stateless and fully democratic and so on.

so there was an efficient bureaucracy. this means there was bureaucracy, but you wouldn't notice.
there was direct democracy, so...
>inb4 i couldn't vote against commies in ussr
follow this logic, user: what is the state? the state is the people. would you vote against having people in power? no. so no ruling capitalists.

I'm no fan of capitalism because the end result will be much the same as what we've seen with historic socialism. However, in the short term starvation as a global problem has been eradicated. Of course, now it has been replaced by obesity and more worryingly a population explosion in Africa

Bureaucracy and fear