ϟϟ Welcome to /nsg/+/sig/: Your one-stop-shop for every redpill known to Yas Forums ϟϟ
MAKE SURE TO VOTE ON WHAT POSTERS VASILY SHOULD MAKE FOR HIS GAME: strawpoll.me
Thread for discussion of
Traditionalism
Anti-Communism
Race Realism
the Aryan Ideal
National Pride
Racial Identity Movements
Improve yourself - Comrades, community, and folk!
> 卐 - SMASH (((MARXISM)))
> 卐 - PURGE DEGENERACY
> 卐 - DISMANTLE ZOG
ᛉ - ARE YOU NEW TO /NSG/? START HERE
pastebin.com
> What is National Socialism?
National Socialism is the belief of man as part of the natural world; it is the idea that society should be structured in accordance with the laws of nature. An integral part of National Socialism is Racial Idealism, an idea based in the unbounding love of one's own people. This love is expressed by placing the interests of the racial community to which you belong ahead of your own individual desires, understanding that this selflessness will be paid back in full by your fellow man.
National Socialism believes in putting the nation before yourself. Despite this, there is considerable difference between the socialism of Hitler and that of Marxist doctrine. Hitler's nationalism has the patriotic motive of placing the good of one’s country before personal ambition while retaining one's individuality and happiness, whereas Marxism squeezes the people dry in favor of a machine-like nation built only for profit.
In short, National Socialism believes that all men are NOT created equal. Just as every individual has his strengths and weaknesses, so too does each race have qualities which are unique to that group. National Socialism believes in the improvement of your people through individual means; its goal is that each new generation of children will be better off than the one before it.
ᛉ - GROUPS/PROJECTS OF INTEREST
gab.com
gab.com
/NSG/ + /SIG/
>socialism
Woah...
12 years of Hitler resulted in THIS?!
I love this man.
Why do you simp for Hitler-chan?
Fun fact: when Hitler came to power, he actually shrunk government intervention in people’s lives in many ways, such as:
>lowering many taxes
>loosening gun restrictions
>privatizing many firms
>disarming the police of their batons
In hitlers Germany, the gestapo was rather small, and most towns didn’t even have one. Hitler’s regime was far more libertarian than most people realize.
...but not libertarian enough.don't forget..after some time this 'surprisingly libertarian' reich ordered all the men in most towns to die, left most women to be raped, and most children to scrounge for food.
>ordered all men in most towns to dies
>left most women to be raped
>left most children to scrounge for food
???
This is what happened after Germany already lost the war
Hitler-chan none-the-less earned these accomplishments. Germans none-the-less endured these accomplishments.
Did Germany choose well when she chose National Socialism?
>being a Simpsons fan in 2020
NatSoc rebirthed Germany’s economy, purged out degeneracy, and saved Germany and the rest of Europe from communism (for as long as it could), so I’d say yes
Yes. It was the best choice. It's defeat was caused by the (((bolsheviks))). It did the best it could.
you think of it this way
o/ National socialism o/ vs (((Bolshevism)))
However, our historical research finds:
((( o/ National Socialism o/ + Bolshevism)))
OK so in your opinion.
The Germany of 2020 is ENTIRELY an improvement, and Hitler-chan is /ourgirl/ ?
Nope.
Also, I don't really care about the past. What I want is a safe future for my children and the white race.
Aren't Libertarians against war?
He wasn't a libertarian.
>he's still falling for the race meme
>He wasn't a libertarian.
This is why I will _NEVER_ simp for Hitler-chan.
Ok, tell me why I shouldn't want to preserve my race.
FUCK OFF STORMFAGS
Hitler’s war was to gain more land to feed Germany’s surplus, overcrowded population. Say what you will about that, but it’s infinitely more justified than the reasons our (((current government))) wages wars thousands of miles away for the benefit of Israel and (((oil companies))).
Ok, I couldn't care less. You're seeing your civilization crumble before your eyes and you just think about "muh (((individualism)))"
You can just trade though
based
He wasn’t a complete libertarian, sure, but his regime was certainly a step in the right direction. After the war ended, I would imagine it would be even more libertarian, since all the enemies would now be gone
Fuck off memeflag.
Language is a roadmap into the structure of human thinking. As such, the moment you begin to use someone else's language, you're adopting their thoughts, and more subversively their assumptions, without realizing it. We need to find, so often created and employed by (((them))). Maybe even create our own language in our favor too.
I'll begin by listing a few and explaining why they should be avoided.
>Gender
This one, in the current usage, implies a separation between biological sex and gender self identification.
>What to use instead: Sex
>Nazi
Created by jews as a slur against National Socialists. The overall lack of connection to any concrete term helps it convey the idea their creators wanted, in simpler terms, 'nazi' is a fictional word created to be used as a strawman. It's a lot harder to corrupt the meaning of "National" and "Socialist" (which are very descriptive), so they made up a word of their own.
>What to use instead: National Socialist, Folkish
>White
This one will be hard for burgers. “White” has the same problem as “nazi” in the sense it can evoke in its speakers and listeners whatever biases they have. European is a superior term which describes the people being discussed, bringing with it all history and imagery of Europe into mind.
>What to say instead: European
>Refugee
This one is pretty obvious. It implies they’re fleeing something. This something is more often than not thought of as “war” or “conflict”, when most of them are being shipped from poor but conflict-free places, from all over the place. It also seeks to evoke sympathy in its listeners, when in fact they are invaders meant to replace a smarter and exigent population. The best remedy to this term is to call them for what they are: invaders.
>What to say instead: Invader
Please contribute adding terms that are missing and suggest replacements for them. Let us also brew our own language in our favor.
Yeah. A post-14 application regime can and should become a libertarian society, too bad libertarian can't think in the future.
Where do you define the boundaries of your race?
>You're seeing your civilization crumble before your eyes
I'm not, things are great. Demoralization propaganda is very rude.
Germans still needed more land to live on, and simply owning the land is much easier than trading for resources you want.
ATOMWAFFEN DIVISION DISBANDED
>you shouldnt use some words because our enemies have deemed them bad words
Imagine being such a cuck. It's okay to say white.
literally who
You’re a massive shill faggot, read a book you dumb nigger!
Why do you need more land to live on?
Countries like Belgium were even more crowded and they didn't need to invade anyone
>What do you define the boundaries
That's a tricky question. As far as skin color goes, I'd say a darker shade of white, close to ivory. Obviously tans and skin condition not included. Ask more specifically if you want.
>Things are going great
Christianity is slowly dying out, the white population is declining, rapes and robberies are increasing exponentially, women are being more and more slutty, men are becoming more and more low-T, wealth is decreasing and going more and more towards just as few whilst the middle class is dying out and Islam is more and more widespread. Just because you close your eyes doesn't mean the problems aren't there.
It's okay to say white, but it's better to say European.
What about White European?
>That's a tricky question.
Without a boundary you'll simp for any dumbfuck that calls himself white. As you've defined, jews qualify as part of your race.
>Just because you close your eyes doesn't mean the problems aren't there.
European problems do not exist here. Please take care of your own problems and do not project them on functional societies with legitimately free markets.
Wait no, that would imply the existence of nonwhite Europeans, which don't exist.
Thanks!
Hitler wanted Eastern Europe specifically because they had loads of good farmland which would feed Germany. He also believed Germanic tribes originally lived in those lands anyway (eg goths).As for Belgium, I’ll admit I don’t know much. I guess it’s just because they were too weak to invade anybody. I’m not one of the folk who say Hitler did nothing wrong, but I do wish to dispel many of the myths.
Exactly, although people mean European when they say "white", European carries the name of a continent in it, a specific geographical mass associated with specific groups of people.
>Jews are part of your race
Depends. Jewish Jews (I.e. isrealians) are still looking closer to arabs, so no. Khazar jews? Kinda. If we were to look closer to it (small brain differences, face characteristics, etc.) due to years and years of inbreeding they're still different.
>European problems
Literally all of those problems apply to the US
>t. Chink
I live, travel, and do business all through out the US. None of those problems are common throughout the country. You watch too much fake news, m8.
I think Burgers need to keep using the term White though. It's the only unifying terminology they have, since while all Europeans in America speak the same language, they do not all have the same roots. They like to see themselves as distinct from Europe, and to call themselves European might prompt their opponents to say "why don't you go back there?" While the nation we know as the USA was definitely and without a doubt founded for and by Europeans.
>Fake news
You clearly don't live among normal citizens, or else you'll notice. From which US state are you?
>mfw...
>another NSG
>only time before discord trannies shill this thread
>People that think they are NS, but have 1TB of black.com porn on computer
>I'm reminded that 80% of pol is not white
The sheer amount of salt
What? We're literally that 20%
That's redundant.
Am I white?
Depends. As Russian? Yes. Are you a slavic Russian from Russia? Yes then.
>White race
>Worth preserving
One of the reasons why Russia has historically been subject to such severe social turmoil is because Russia is not a homogeneous country.
There are Europeans in Russia but many of them are mixed with Asiatic peoples, which seems appropriate since it's a Eurasian country whose impressive size spans both continents.
I wouldn't know if you are white unless you post hand.
Pretty much every so-called "NatSoc" who is just a spicy conservative.
Yes. Cucks like you not welcome. Now go back to blacked.
>white women