How could this guy predict so earlier, when there was no case in italy, the first lockdown after china?
if this is true this is a big deal, because it would make one of the following two assumptions true for strength:
-virus voluntarily spread in Italy: the virus would have arrived anyway but its spreading is facilitated to accelerate the things that would happen anyway in order to study the reaction and the containment measures to be exported to other nations.
-virus not voluntarily spread in Italy: it means that Italian tests have been emphasized and containment measures accelerated while it has let itself be spread elsewhere without doing anything. supporting clues: other countries have a significantly higher contagion curve, like spain.
Or it was just by pure luck that the guy wrote this (it would be incredible though)
but it's not the prediction only. it's that the gauy seem to be well prepared and wrote a lot of things AND this prediction. you take care in writing all thesee things and try to guess by pure chance something that was absolutely impossibile to guess? why italy with zero cases, why not japan or thailand
Levi Hill
The WHO infected someone on purpose, Italy is a sacrifice to provide the rest of the world with the knowledge of how to beat this thing. They are 11 days ahead of the US. Remember that.
Kayden Anderson
i am also quite new on this board.
could you confirm that it was written on january?
Zachary King
nothing makes sense, not even to people who dwell into this place daily and read even the most schizo bullshit that can be seen here
Christopher Taylor
>We often give our enemies the means for our own destruction. -Aesop
