>What:
Ethnostate
>Why:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children
>How:
The Northwest Imperative
>Where:
Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Western Montana
Introduction: northwestfront.org
Why aren't you here?
>What:
Ethnostate
>Why:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children
>How:
The Northwest Imperative
>Where:
Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Western Montana
Introduction: northwestfront.org
Why aren't you here?
Other urls found in this thread:
>Why aren't you here?
I am, Victoria BC. There is no point in establishing one here, let alone even the tiniest of chances of one being successful. Coronachan better start mutating and killing everyone if you want this to happen.
Bump
GAAAAAY LARP KYS
Don't be a defeatist
bump
What are prices for housing out in the West?
Okay, even if demographics are more or less on your side FOR NOW, how do you go about doing this? How do you convince the US and Canadian government to let this go? What needs to happen before this can actually be set into motion?
Cia glownigger Post.
You guys are smarter than to fall for this I hope
Talk about the hitlerite worldview, OP
Depends on where you're looking
holy fuck I'm sold, not on the LARPing aspect of it as i do not want any FIB agents on my fucking cock but as much as I love the south Yankee carpetbaggers are moving in, IN DROVES, every license plate that isn't SC are from Northern States, primarily CT. I want out.
You break the federal government's credible monopoly on force.
I should tell you that western Canada is not in the picture right now.
Read the brigade for a full picture.
Wouldn't a glownigger need to collect information or advocate joining a group?
Everyone in this movement repeatedly pleads not to engage in violence or break the law at all.
Nobody wants you to LARP. This isn't attomwaffen.
If you're a racially aware white, move to the PNW. That's the northwest imperative. When the balloon goes up you'll be among peers.
>You break the federal government's credible monopoly on force
So the plan is to convince enough WNs to move to the PNW, organize them under a strict leadership, and then become more armed than NATO?
It's more about testing to see if the federal govt is willing to go scorched earth on white dissidents vs just cutting losses and ceding a small piece of territory.
I want in, but I'm not full white
:(
No, the plan is to encourage white migrants and awaken the natives, then engage in a decentralized revolutionary war when the appropriate time comes. 1776 v 2.
No strict leadership and no international level warfare. You only need to make it more costly for the government to occupy the territory than they can stand to afford.
Would you pass the Nuremberg laws?
>tired of being held responsible for something your ancestors didn't even do?
I assume this is talking about slaves.
My ancestors had slaves. So what, should I have to be responsible for that now in some way?
>and awaken the natives
Do you mean the indigenous groups of the area? How will you get them on board? Or do you mean whites who already live here?
>You only need to make it more costly for the government to occupy the territory than they can stand to afford
So basically hundreds of thousands of angry, armed, self-sufficient White Nationalists?
The hitlerite worldview is a healthy racial perspective on the dissident right but not something I would put forward as a necessary position because of all the mud thrown in from Hollywood Nazi propaganda.
No, I mean native whites, not Indians.
Personally I would advocate respecting the native Indian tribes' land claims.
>So basically hundreds of thousands of angry, armed, self-sufficient White Nationalists?
Basically yes, not nearly that many are really necessary to engage in resistance though. Average Americans who want to be free just like in 1776.
Not him, but I'm certain he means whites who already live there. Also, don't underestimate the power of a self-sufficient rebel force. The USA did so in Vietnam and Afghanistan and got humiliated both times
>Personally I would advocate respecting the native Indian tribes' land claims.
That's an interesting and perhaps politically useful stance.
So can we go into your definition of "White"? Would I (pic), for example, qualify? What European groups are not acceptable as "White" in your conceptualization of an ethnostate? What about religion?
If you're one of the few who actually did have slaveholding ancestors, and even supposing your ancestors acquired those slaves in an immoral way and mistreated them, you of course shouldn't be demonized like we are.
Yes you're obviously white.
Everyone knows who is white and who is not by using their eyes. No need for a purity spiral.
>What about religion?
>We are a community of blood, not of faith. Race, not religion, is what is important. For the sake of our own and future generations, we agree to lay aside all differences of religion between White people, now and forever.
northwestfront.org
>definition of "White"?
Seems to me that as much as europeans differentiate and have a troubled history of getting along together, they do just fine when confronted by a greater enemy, this (imo) isn't the time to get picky.
>above average IQ
>80% more European Ancestry
>Clean Record
>when?
Never
Lol
Yes, you're definitely white.
As for who is white, this is the general criteria most advocates for the NAR go by:
>Your ancestors were native to the land no further east than the Russians
>As far south as the Greeks, Italians, and Spaniards
>You have no significant Semitic blood
Other factors that would get you kicked out would be:
>Having sex with somebody who doesn't fit the above criteria
>Following a religion that can't be in some way rationalized to be white (Example: Christianity is okay despite some saying it originates in the Middle East, but Islam is not
>Being an advocate of modern ideas like Feminism, Marxism, etc
% more European Ancestry
I don't think we need to drop our standards like that
>Why aren't you here?
I am HERE, but I don't see you any where.
Where is the Mutual Aid? Where is the Organization for survival? What is the use of moving to the PNW, if there is no visible organization what so ever?
So is Christianity OK for real?
>Having sex with somebody who doesn't fit the above criteria
My ex girlfriend is Chinese. Am I out?
Yes for real and explicitly.
Harold Covington always condemned all anti Christian "kike on a stick" talk. Anyone who's not a D&C shill realizes that you don't get anywhere in a right wing populist movement by attacking the religion of the majority of your people.
Even more, the right wing needs Christians.
Well then I guess I'm in. Couple years and I can leave this shit hole anyway.
If you're asking me, yes you're out. You have demonstrated moral failure.
It would of course be up to a new government to set the laws.
Listen to rfn, read the books, and take a scouting trip in the meantime.
>If you're asking me, yes you're out.
So having sex (but not children) with a racial other is a damnable offence? Have you had sex before?
I'm in this boat as well, I'm all for the idea of organizing and meeting up. but of course 3 letter agencies would be all over that
Yes my white wife and I fulfilled the basic expectation of not fornicating and marrying within the race
WE SUBHUMANS KICKED YOUR ASS AND MADE YOUR LEADER COMMIT SUDOKU KEK
Reach out to the NF if you want. Don't expect handouts, they're the ones who need out support.
The real organization is living healthy lives and reproducing in white society.
>Italy
>To America
>WE SUBHUMANS KICKED YOUR ASS AND MADE YOUR LEADER COMMIT SUDOKU KEK
Now I'm confused
Alright well I think you'll want to drop some of the clearly Christian-inspired puritanical moral regulations if you want to pull any significant numbers. Personally I don't think """white""" ethnostatism is a viable strategy at all, but that's just my take. Can we just clarify one last thing? said
>Your ancestors were native to the land no further east than the Russians
>As far south as the Greeks, Italians, and Spaniards
Do these restrictions include or exclude Russians, Greeks, Italians, and Spaniards? Would they therefore include Albanians, Armenians, Azeris, Turks, or Georgians?
I meant to @ you, sorry.
That's not a historically accurate use of the term puritanical but ok.
Clearly include Russians, Greeks, Italians, Spanish. I'm not really personally familiar with the phenotypes of southeast Europe so I won't give an answer, not like I'm anyone important.
It should also be obvious that a white man can be anywhere, south Africa for example. Nonwhites can also be a significant part of the population of a white country, like in Greece.
>Puritanical
adj. Rigorous in religious observance; marked by stern morality.
It worked fine, user.
>Nonwhites can also be a significant part of the population of a white country, like in Greece
Greece is ~90% ethnically Greek. Are some ethnic Greeks "white", while others are not?
I'm not really personally familiar with the phenotypes of southeast Europe
Geographically speaking, Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan are not typically thought of as being a part of Europe. However Chechnyans are based in Europe. Would they qualify?
I would tend to say yes, personally.
Op is right look at donbass and luhansk they are a free peoples republic because it cost to much to take back the land
Are Italians allowed in?
Is there a path of naturalization for men who are not 100% white but like 85-15?
Asking for a friend on minecraft
>Personally I would advocate respecting the native Indian tribes' land claims.
Based. I respect this.
Anglo-Celtic/Abo alliance soon.
Can the NWTI be a constitutional monarchy in name like Rhodesia?
I'm thinking Dominion of Oregon.
Great example
Italians are white of course
15% non-white is non-white
Absolutely not. The NAR is a republic in the American liberty tradition.
Come here, we're too soft to ever arrest you! You'll be going right where people are vulnerable to you big, tough people so spineless you can't uphold anything about white culture but niggering out about skin color. The northwest is the one and only place soft enough for you to survive in, so nigger on up here, whiteboys.
But how are white gonna join if they could become even more a minority through warfare?
what if you're 98% white
American values are inherently degenerate.
>I would tend to say yes, personally.
Ok. Chechnyans are ~95% Muslim, that picture was actually a Chechnyan Jihadist "Death battalion".
So to summarize, your PNW White ethnostate would accept Jihadis from the Caucasus over an "obviously white" man (your words) who fucked some Chinese pussy?
Then you're 2% non white
The point is no visible non-white ancestry
Then stay home, we don't need you
Muslim, Mormon, Christian, it does not matter as long as they are willing to cooperate.
Yes, miscegenation is intolerable and religious differences are tolerable.
>Yes
Got it. Good luck, matey.
But the average white american is 2% non-white.
According to who, (((23 and me)))?
I wasn't very clear, 2% is easily within a margin of error and doesn't manifest non white ancestry in the person.