What does the outside world make of Britain's "herd immunity" approach to tackling Coronavirus? Smart and best for the longterm or insane and catastrophic?
What does the outside world make of Britain's "herd immunity" approach to tackling Coronavirus...
It’s kind of fucked up desu
Literally the most:
>based
>chad
>scientific
>rational
>logical
decision one can make in reaction to the virus
God save Boris.
It's complete insanity
Or maybe they know it's bullshit and are calling the bluff.
The UK government would never try to do that
Boris the Blade is a badass. Willing to sacrifice millions for herd immunity.
>What does the outside world make of Britain's "herd immunity"
All the western nations do this, and only go for flattening the curve, but not in the same way.
Denmark and Norway does by infecting a good number, and then cklosing down everything, while you bongs, the Swedes and the Finns go for herd immunity by infecting children.
All aim to just flatten the curve, since our elites needs open borders to shithole countries in the future as well.
What strategy Italy did, IDK, but they failed at flattening the curve and will have a new million infected per day, when they reach the peak in 14 days.
>decision one can make in reaction to the virus
Not if it becomes a cluster fuck like italy, or if corona comes back mutated next year, and kills all the weak that the bong strategy of infecting children sought to stop.
The smartest would probably be to shut it down this year, and use the year to prepare for next years mutated corona, if open borders and endless brown immigration was more important that saving white people.
>It's complete insanity
So what is the burger way to flatten the curve and get herd immunity, since that is your strategy as well?