Has science gone too far?

they're obviously talking about viable same sex embryos
and theyre coming very soon

They can do evil shit like this but they can't cure baldness.

>nat·u·ral
>/ˈnaCH(ə)rəl/
>existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind.

It is unnatural.

This is what the babies are going to look like

Attached: retardtard.png (1166x596, 1.01M)

It won't get the chance. God's seen enough.

>humans are doing this
You're assuming a lot there, friendo.

Feeling a strong urge to start the reactor.

>Has science gone too far?
Do you really wanna know?

Attached: 1581427274316.jpg (750x784, 156.5K)

IDEA clearly written at the top of the page. As in Science Fiction - emphasis on the fiction. Two sperm cannot fertilize each other. If they could, men's scrotums would be exploding from all the fetuses.

This is why God is hitting us with corona. He just started with the chinese because xi mouthed off, but this right here is what really caught his attention. xi may have claimed to be god, but we in the west actually tried to be god.

>Every thing you do is a reflection of your parents because they raised you!

Attached: eatthemall.gif (498x280, 698.94K)

Holy shit this is a nuclear mog

Fake news. (((Scientists))) can't even make real genitals for trannies that aren't Frankenstein abominations.

Hello?
Based department?
We need some cleansing here.

>gays harness the power of genetic engineering to create 10/10 chad designer babies
>they are so chad they win in competition against virgin natty births
>the selection process favors engineered babies, natties get the long slow rope

Attached: hit or miss.jpg (640x1024, 60.16K)

Based

No faggot. Humans are a part of nature, but that doesn't mean everything we do is natural.

>Anything humans make is natural because we're part of nature.

According to that logic, Monsanto's genetically engineered crops are "natural."

Our actions are only "natural" if they are in accordance with Nature's Eternal Laws, I.e. Natural Law.

Inb4 the "child" comes out as a braindead mutant and we're all forced to look at it as it's paraded around on the news

Im boutta start fedposting boys

WHY CAN'T SCIENCE DO SOME NON FAGGY SHIT AND BRING BACK MAMMOTHS OR DODOS OR SOMETHING

Who cares flying planes are unnatural, gas engines are unnatural, food safety is unnatural
Humans fix problems

Define Natural Law.

What....the....fuck

kys with your kike semantics.

I wonder if the two men babies will be gigachads

The immutable laws that govern the Natural world.

yup

Attached: LadyDoctor.png (498x728, 469.54K)

Yes! By which I mean, "Yay!"

antiviral drugs and vaccines are also unnatural

None of those things defy Nature's edicts.

Attached: MeatWhores.png (640x800, 567.32K)

She better not have used her son's sperm for insemination, though I wouldn't put anything past degenerates... even incest.

Not far enough. I want to be able to kill millions with a thought.

It hasn't gone too far enough for me. I demand science make them able to shit these unholy abominations from their well-traveled anuses.

>Anything humans make is natural

Yeah idk about that one chief

Just because humans use a word a certain way doesnt mean the term is logically sound
>but that doesn't mean everything we do is natural
It literally does. Appeals to nature are logical fallacies. There's no such thing as 'unnatural', it's an oxymoron and not an argument.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature

wut dem azn cryon tast liek?

Attached: azncryon.jpg (369x136, 13.44K)

>The immutable laws that govern the Natural world.
If something broke natural laws it wouldnt be possible in the first place.
You're using a circular argument.
Cease your dumb non arguments and meaningless moralfagging not based on anything pther than appeals to nature

Either everything is natural or nothing is.
Electicity, cities and industrialization are exactly as natural as same sex embryos.

Its unethical science.

The root origin (Latin) of words is the basis for a language, which language is very mathematical and logic based. So much so that it affects perception.

This is why kikes like you resort to linguistic manipulations and try to change the meaning of words. Do fuck off with you shitty attempts at gaslighting!

That's a much better premise. But you still have to explain why you think so.

This is impossible, won't work.

Hot take from first aid kindergarten.

>which language is very mathematical and logic based.
No it isn't lol.
>logically sound debate and using proper definitions to set grounds for said debate is devil kike joo-joo
the brainletest of posts

I cant wait until I can clone myself and grow the clone in an artificial womb in my living room and raise the clone like a son with my hologram ai waifu.

Attached: 1484784525452.jpg (770x760, 70.44K)

Basically, a homunculus.

Because its a strange and foreign concept that us humans are not meant to do.

What would a YY chromosome person look like?

Implying this doesn’t lead to a world of only women.

yes
thankfully we have a more serious issue than this bullshit now

>Because its a strange and foreign concept
Okay that just means it's taboo in our society. Taboos vary by culture and change over time. They can be good, harmful or neutral but are not a priori good for society to maintain.
>that us humans are not meant to do.
Why not?

We humans were already designed for our biological contents so there is no need to alter it.

This was prophesied.

youtu.be/PNhXYmJ0G8c

You can apply the same logic to any modern (or ancient) medicine though.
It's essentially a radical primitivist position

>they groom our children
How do we redpill normies on the truth? All gays should be seen as the grooming pedophiles that they are.

Attached: 1553969173874.png (1200x732, 578.76K)

But this isn't necessary for humans unlike medicine so really there isn't a purpose to do this.

>they groom our children
they are not """your""" children; they have absolutely nothing to do with you.
i bet you're a single beta lmao

That's a good point.
But who determines what's necessary?
It might not be necessary for you but necessary for someone else.
Also what if all females suddenly disappeared tomorrow? Would it still be wrong?
You could argue that a lot of treatments are unnecessary yet people still use them. Hell, you could argue that all treatments are unnecessary and nature should just run its course.