Whores deconstruct virginity
By thumbnail alone, before I start I'm getting my sock and lube.
OK Groomer
Imagine dedicating your life and money to a whore that previously fucked another guy basically for free.
Second hand goods won't get a ring from me
Marrying a total qt virgin next month (covid-19 don't fuck this up for me) and couldn't be happier. I can't imagine marrying a whore
>virgins deconstruct sex
>old enough to marry
>virgin
user, I...
What is the cure for such disorders? Beatings.
TedXOslo
>Oslo
>a fucking CROSS
Who even watches tedtalk?
the corona virus can be transmitted by coom
ok degenerate
it just so happens that the virginity, or the lack thereof is a great predictor of a lot of qualities. i can know whether a woman is
>virtuous
>loyal
>promiscuous
>less likely to cheat
>less likely to divorce
>less likely to have disgusting stds
>less likely to have hpv which can give men oral cancer
>virtuous
no
>loyal
no
>promiscuous
no
>less likely to cheat
no
>less likely to divorce
no
>less likely to have disgusting stds
yes
>less likely to have hpv which can give men oral cancer
yes
Shit like this is why I have nothing but contempt, distrust and disgust for women. If women were capable of not being whores, we wouldn't need virginity checks. Just don't sleep around and expect commitment from me. I am only interested in monogamy. Lustful sluts fuck off please.
literally all those things are true, don't get mad because your country is full of blown out roasties nigel.
I'm convinced Feminism is a psyop by an actual patriarchy, and its designed to trick women into defeminizing themselves, causing man to demand alternatives to women, which, in a competitive market, will birth sex bots and artificial wombs, effectively seizing the means of reproduction
This. Also when a man cums inside a woman, she absorbs a part of his DNA.
Why does there need to be two of them? And I noticed how it takes a full five minutes of feminist propaganda preamble before they finally get to "the point" which turns out to merely be "the hymen can sometimes break before sex." And that's it. That's the entire point. It took two women, 10 minutes of fluff, and a preposterous hoola hoop demonstration to explain that sometimes the hymen breaks without sex and that therefore we should pretend that that is usually the case, even though it isn't.
This is what Big Feminism gets away with and gets money for. This sort of nonsense.
>>virtuous
Yes, by definition
>>loyal
no
>>promiscuous
Yes, by definition
>>less likely to cheat
Statistically, yes
>>less likely to divorce
Statistically, yes
>>less likely to have disgusting stds
yes
>>less likely to have hpv which can give men oral cancer
yes
It's not about the skin flap, or even the theory of their twat getting bigger, it's the fact the personality changes after their first pair bond is broken.
The strongest relationships are where the guy is the woman's first and only.
>Virginity doesn't matter because its just a social construct
>What? you hate feminism? I bet you're just a virgin incel!
Bingo
>The strongest relationships are where the guy is the woman's first and only
100% this.
>Virtuous
Not neccessarily
>Loyal
Definitely a +10 to the loyalty modifier
>Promiscuous
Women with many partners are statistically more likely to be promiscuous, you complete and utter fucking moron. It's literally foundational to the concept of promiscuity.
>Less likely to cheat
Statistically true
>Less likely to divorce
Statistically true
>Less likely to have disgusting stds
Obviously
>Less likely to have HPV
Obviously.
ftfy
>it's the fact the personality changes
This.
How did you manage to find a virgin user?
Roastie spotted
If she breathes...
Do roasties not understand that it isn’t literally the hymen that’s important, it’s what I represents
some Scandinavian whores LMAO
Nope. There's no way that you can predict the first five things. Being a virgin isn't going to make them more virtuous or loyal. That's simply absurd cope. OK, maybe if they're a thirty year old virgin and, yes, then you could assume they are going to be less promiscuous but so what. Do you want to fuck thirty year old virgins? Do you think they might have other drawbacks? You're not going to fuck them anyway, at the end of the day.
and where the woman is not a whore
>Why should you care about an obscure little skinfold on the female body?
First of all, I could same to many American women who recoil in revulsion over a baby's foreskin, as they hand their newborn sons over to be circumcision.
Second of all, I care because of what that skinfold represents. Is there anything more obnoxious than female dishonesty/female taqiyya?
thanks for saving me the time. I was watching this shit at 1.5 speed because of how fucking slow she was talking.
Do yourself a favor and google divorce rates and number of sexual partners
what a smug face, this needs to be a meme with the "check them" hands
>women are still mistrusted if they are whores
oh no
Nordic sluts at it again? Color me surprised.
I think the problem is that most women actually never really get over their first and will constantly compare.
I have never touched a non virgin in my life
Right, but a virgin is an unknown quantity in that regard. They're untested. That's the whole point.
What your count up to roastie?
this.
I was this virgin qt trad wife's first kiss and she compared every other guy to me after. Her psycho dad didnt let me date her cause I was older than her and now she's on the run from a junkie who knocked her up and shot her up with heroine and other drugs against her consent.
And even then you can never "know". That's absurd. Literally just fucking nonsense.
Ummm no the study show that they least sexual partners one has the less likely hood of divorce.
>junkie who knocked her up and shot her up with heroine and other drugs against her consent.
Larp or actually real?
I can never know what? That I won’t get coin toss divorce rate risk, yeah I prefer to not know how that feels and that’s why I refuse to marry anyone who isn’t a virgin
So how do you know that someone who has never been fucked is somehow guaranteed to be loyal to you? Where is your evidence? It doesn't make sense. At all.
Pic related is why you insufferable roastie. High nuptuality and high investment parenting, literal r/K selection. The lower number of sexual partners, the higher chance a marriage will be successful and result in a positive environment for children. White western countries are the only population on earth who do this, I wonder if there is some correlation between that and their success?
Whores should be beaten!
I've only seen the one Russian asset talk about male circumcision. Men don't do this though. Their pee pees aren't the center of any ideological struggle, even where they attest to Freudian sympathies. Seems the fairer sex is more sex obsessed.
roastie logic
>virgin
Was she a butt-slut in college or Catholic?
In the first 30 seconds I figured out she is retarded.
Sounds like my wife, except I didnt cuck out and let her fucking dad stop me from dating her.
I will buy sex bot and create my children in a lab in 20 years. No need to pay child support to a gold digger. I can raise my children in peace and with enough money that isn't wasted on clothes and make-up for a bitch.
>ctrl + f "microchimerism"
>0 results
>only 1 post about DNA
absolute state of Yas Forums
Teddit
They are misinterpreting the argument and twisting it to have the focus they specifically want, "the little skinfold", this is so typical. It's very childish and disingenuous, they do this with every issue they want to "debunk" or deconstruct, it doesn't matter which.
The value around female virginity in so many cultures through history was never about the hymen per se (that was a primitive proof of it), but about having had sex with other men, it was if anything a deeply rooted possessive thing, maybe an atavic instinctual fear of being cuckolded by mating with a woman that had already been impregnated, who knows, but it was about that not about a little skinfold. Talk about getting lost in the details.
Divorce rates for the last time retard those with lower sexual partners are least likely to divorce. I know roastie don't care about pair bonding they just want to hop from dick to dick.
Congratulations. She may not have had intercourse, but I can confirm that she could hold a masterclass in sucking cock.
holy shit checked
Why create your own children in a lab when you can have artificially growing and evolving bots made starting from infancy that you can also have sex with whenever you want.
>i can know whether a woman is virtuous
>i can know whether a woman is loyal
>i can know whether a woman is promiscuous
This is absolute nonsense.
Sorry, but it is.
You can't know these things.
You can look at a total slut and rule her out. Fair enough. Actually a good idea. Reasonable, in fact.
The actual claim that was made was fucking retarded. It's a laughably optimistic and naive point of view.
>virtuous
>loyal
possible
>promiscuous
>less likely to cheat
she's a normie woman (non-playable character) so propoganda to be a whore will work it's evil magic
>less likely to divorce
true, until she's ""not happy anymore""
>less likely to have disgusting stds
>less likely to have hpv which can give men oral cancer
100% this
These re my virgin guards, I have 25 of them.
They are checked every night for their virginity by the head of my benis
>So how do you know that someone who has never been fucked is somehow guaranteed to be loyal to you?
because just that, they don't regard fucking as a sport but as an extension of a spiritual bond, they don't have the notion of cheap pleasure (and pursue it) in the same way in the ratpack experiment rats who were socially healthy weren't addicts
it's only recently, through shows like sex and the city and frat house (((comedies))), that meaning has been extirpated from sex, it was common to date to find a right mate, but you'd only have sex after settling down
This. Straw-manning... TEDx please
I have no problem with whores as long as they are honest. Would not marry one tho
Just show tits already.