If so, is stealth now irrelevant as Russia surely has this type of tech installed on all its AA missile sites and also gives this tech to allies such as Iran.
Can passive radar really track the F-35?
Isaac Williams
Cooper Barnes
We are so fucked.. All the defence money goes into this aircraft
Colton Morales
>Turns left at 1400 mph, invalidating your missile
Sorry sweetie :/
Juan Bailey
> surely has this type of tech installed on all its AA missile sites and also gives this tech to allies such as Iran.
no they cannot. radar like this gets all sorts of false positives, you will track birds instead of planes, it's impossible to use radar like this for guidance.
sure you can track "stealth planes". if you can weed out all the false positives and then what are you going to do? you can't launch a missile using this as guidance.
David Rodriguez
>Air show
So when it had transponders on and wasn't in stealth mode? Amazing.
Christian Bennett
The F22 was better than the F35. Change my mind.
Isaac Robinson
>I want to ask a question about the specifics of a military technology
>should I ask on /k/, the board for this specific purpose where people with relevant knowledge post?
>no, I'll ask Yas Forums
you are a nigger
Juan Reyes
You're right myn nikker
Alexander Thompson
Passive radar actually gets a brilliant size estimate. So an F-35 shows up as a large object while a bird doesn’t show up at all. It’s the nature of being a passive radar, it needs a larger object to interfere with the EM environment.
Caleb Adams
Passive radar doesn’t benefit from transponders.