Anyone else catch this or have more information? Coincidence that Bill Gates owns the patent? Wtf, over?!?!
centerforhealthsecurity.org
Event 201
Other urls found in this thread:
washingtonpost.com
cnbc.com
dailymail.co.uk
qz.com
realityblurred.com
gulfnews.com
forbes.com
edition.cnn.com
blogs.wsj.com
thaipbsworld.com
straitstimes.com
inquirer.com
hoodline.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
dailymail.co.uk
biometricupdate.com
scmp.com
msn.com
nymag.com
markets.businessinsider.com
en.wikipedia.org
archive.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
gatesfoundation.org
pirbright.ac.uk
gatesfoundation.org
patents.google.com
pirbright.ac.uk
patentimages.storage.googleapis.com
twitter.com
Am I trippin? Being a conspiracy nut?
You are on the right track, Corona is a Hoax made by (((them))).
Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.
Fuck bro. For real
This event took place in October of last year.
The exercise consisted of pre-recorded news broadcasts, live “staff” briefings, and moderated discussions on specific topics. These issues were carefully designed in a compelling narrative that educated the participants and the audience.
>Bill Gates predicts 33 million deaths:
washingtonpost.com
>33 infected in California:
cnbc.com
>33 year-old Chinese victim:
dailymail.co.uk
>33% increase in one day:
qz.com
>Amazing race 33 cancelled from corona:
realityblurred.com
>33 cases in Bahrain:
gulfnews.com
>33 million locked down in China:
forbes.com
>33 year-old German victim:
edition.cnn.com
>Wall street Journal vol. 33:
blogs.wsj.com
>Thailand’s 33rd case:
thaipbsworld.com
>Singapore’s 33rd case:
straitstimes.com
>Virus interrupts 33rd wedding anniversary:
inquirer.com
>9 screened for corona;33% looking to relocate:
hoodline.com
>the coronavirus genome ends with 33 a‘s
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
notice something?
The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering. Efforts to prevent such consequences or respond to them as they unfold will require unprecedented levels of collaboration between governments, international organizations, and the private sector. There have been important efforts to engage the private sector in epidemic and outbreak preparedness at the national or regional level.1,2 However, there are major unmet global vulnerabilities and international system challenges posed by pandemics that will require new robust forms of public-private cooperation to address.
The Event 201 pandemic exercise, conducted on October 18, 2019, vividly demonstrated a number of these important gaps in pandemic preparedness as well as some of the elements of the solutions between the public and private sectors that will be needed to fill them. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose the following:
Yes
(They) little hold the strings to everything. It’s all so pointless
Governments, international organizations, and businesses should plan now for how essential corporate capabilities will be utilized during a large-scale pandemic. During a severe pandemic, public sector efforts to control the outbreak are likely to become overwhelmed. But industry assets, if swiftly and appropriately deployed, could help to save lives and reduce economic losses. For instance, companies with operations focused on logistics, social media, or distribution systems will be needed to enable governments’ emergency response, risk communications, and medical countermeasure distribution efforts during a pandemic. This includes working together to ensure that strategic commodities are available and accessible for public health response. Contingency planning for a potential operational partnership between government and business will be complex, with many legal and organizational details to be addressed. Governments should work now to identify the most critical areas of need and reach out to industry players with the goal of finalizing agreements in advance of the next large pandemic. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board would be well positioned to help monitor and contribute to the efforts that governments, international organizations and businesses should take for pandemic preparedness and response.
there is also no videos of people collapsing in the streets.
no videos like this from italy, germany, japan, USA etc.
Industry, national governments, and international organizations should work together to enhance internationally held stockpiles of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to enable rapid and equitable distribution during a severe pandemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently has an influenza vaccine virtual stockpile, with contracts in place with pharmaceutical companies that have agreed to supply vaccines should WHO request them. As one possible approach, this virtual stockpile model could be expanded to augment WHO’s ability to distribute vaccines and therapeutics to countries in the greatest need during a severe pandemic. This should also include any available experimental vaccine stockpiles for any WHO R&D Blueprint pathogens to deploy in a clinical trial during outbreaks in collaboration with CEPI, GAVI, and WHO. Other approaches could involve regional stockpiles or bi- or multinational agreements. During a catastrophic outbreak, countries may be reluctant to part with scarce medical resources. A robust international stockpile could therefore help to ensure that low and middle resource settings receive needed supplies regardless of whether they produce such supplies domestically. Countries with national supplies or domestic manufacturing capabilities should commit to donating some supply/product to this virtual stockpile. Countries should support this effort through the provision of additional funding.
notice how there is news that politicians and other kikes got infected?
These Jews are just larping the disease.
I predict bunch of famous Kikes will fake their deaths during this to make it look more legit.
They just put it right out there for us to see. It’s so blatant all I did was google event 201 and boom
It's no coincidence. This is their last ditch attempt to tank the economy and stop Trump.
Damn. Probably
It’s bigger than that
Trump has a seat at (their) table as well.
Better. Good work user
I know. But, if you tell normal people that all of this is to prevent a mass evolution of the human consciousness they won't understand.
Look up h1n1 vaccine ties to WHO. Same shit, different day.
the thing is you dont even need that fucking suit because the Virus is not a real thing.
Its jews stirring up panic.
look at the news what is actually happening:
dailymail.co.uk
biometricupdate.com
scmp.com
msn.com
nymag.com
markets.businessinsider.com
I smoked pot with Johnny Hopkins.
Doesn't mean he didn't turn on them.
All I know is something is not right with this “pandemic” something is about to happen
Yep. Best thing to do is harness all of that mental and physical strength we've been working on for years. Something is coming, and it would be wise to be ready.
Originally named the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, the school was founded in 1916 by William H. Welch with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. The school was renamed the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health on April 20, 2001 in honor of Michael Bloomberg (founder of the eponymous media company) for his financial support and commitment to the school and Johns Hopkins University. Bloomberg has donated a total of $2.9 billion to Johns Hopkins University over a period of several decades.
The school is also the founder of Delta Omega (est. 1924), the national honorary society for graduate training in public health.[10][11] The Bloomberg School is fully accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH).[12]
Origins
In 1913, the Rockefeller Foundation sponsored a conference on the need for public health education in the United States. Foundation officials were convinced that a new profession of public health was needed. It would be allied to medicine but also distinct, with its own identity and educational institutions.[13] The result of deliberations between public health leaders and foundation officials was the Welch–Rose Report of 1915, which laid out the need for adequately trained public health workers, and envisioned an "institute of hygiene" for the United States.[14] The Report, reflected the different preferences of the plan's two architects—William Henry Welch favoured scientific research, whereas Wickliffe Rose wanted an emphasis on public health practice.[13]
en.wikipedia.org
In June 1916, the executive committee of the Rockefeller Foundation approved the plan to organize an institute or school of public health at the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, United States. The institute was named the School of Hygiene and Public Health, indicating a compromise between those who wanted the practical public health training on the British model and those who favoured basic scientific research on the German model.[14] Welch, the first Dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine also became the founding Dean of the first school of public health in the United States.
The facility is located on the former Maryland Hospital site founded in 1797. The Maryland Hospital was originally built as a hospital to care for Yellow Fever for the indigent away from the city. In 1840, the hospital expanded to exclusively care for the mentally ill. In 1873, the buildings were torn down as the facility relocated to a new site as the Spring Grove Hospital Center.[15]
en.wikipedia.org
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development by the Rockefeller Foundation
"In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability
was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed highemitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
...
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish. •
Technological innovation in “Lock Step” is largely driven by government and is focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments’ dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens. In states with poor governance, large-scale projects that fail to progress abound.
Technology trends and applications we might see:
• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”
• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.
• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.
• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lowerbandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.
• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls. Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.
can someone please tell me the fuck im reading
I'd highly recommend Yas Forumstards to read or at least skim through the Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development by the Rockefeller Foundation document that I just posted. It's incredibly chilling. We know that these people have an intense goal in depopulating us and a pandemic would be a great way to do that. But even more frightening, would be to use this crisis to expand police state measures to unprecedented levels. They could use this to achieve everything from mandatory vaccinations, banning public displays of affection (to destroy cultural bonds and courtship), and even banning cash to implement the NWO digital phoenix currency that they've been dreaming about for some many decades. This shit is coming down fast now, people. You need to be aware of what their goals are and what strategies they will use to achieve them.
youtube.com
Did Bill Gates & World Economic Forum Predict Coronavirus Outbreak? An Inside Look at Event 201 Simulation
I would, but I never learned too read
youtube.com
Event 201 Highlights, Advocating Censorship/Centralizing of the Internet in the hands of global governmental organizations
What is the relevant patent that Gates owns?
good trawl
what do you extrapolate from this?
gatesfoundation.org
This company recieved a grant from Gates Foundation.
They manufacture all kinds of vaccines against flu.
>bank notes contaminated
the jews really want to get rid of paper currency and force crypto currency onto everyone
Event 201
both the iranian and the uk health ministers have the virus
what are the odds?
The Pirbright Institute
Date: November 2013
Purpose: to improve our understanding of, and effective use of, current control tools and measures (including vaccines) against peste des petits ruminants and foot and mouth disease, two serious diseases affecting livestock that are widespread in developing countries
Amount: $189,232
Term: 49
Topic: Agricultural Development
Program: Global Growth and Opportunity
Grantee Location: Woking, Surrey
Grantee Website: pirbright.ac.uk
gatesfoundation.org
kek, search for “coronavirus patent” and first results are how it is a conspiracy theory shared by a facebook group
Anno was right
EP3172319B1
European Patent Office
Other languages: German, French
Inventor:Erica Bickerton, Sarah KEEP, Paul BrittonCurrent
Assignee: Pirbright Institute, Pirbright Inst
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001]
The present invention relates to an attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene, which causes the virus to have reduced pathogenicity. The present invention also relates to the use of such a coronavirus in a vaccine to prevent and/or treat a disease.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
[0002]
Avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), the aetiological agent of infectious bronchitis (IB), is a highly infectious and contagious pathogen of domestic fowl that replicates primarily in the respiratory tract but also in epithelial cells of the gut, kidney and oviduct. IBV is a member of the Order Nidovirales, Family Coronaviridae, Subfamily Coronavirinae and Genus Gammacoronavirus; genetically very similar coronaviruses cause disease in turkeys, guinea fowl and pheasants.
It's incredible, user. You can show all the stuff all of us have posted in this thread to the normies, and they're so conditioned that they will start frothing in rage while shouting you down as a conspiracy theorist. The ignorance and retardation of the normies is literally endangering all of us.
bump
>You are on the right track, Corona is a Hoax made by (((them))).
It's not a hoax, it's their bioweapon. They unleashed it on China but now it's backfiring.
That’s who ones the patent in Europe. Just researched that
patentimages.storage.googleapis.com
The genetic code starts at page 8.
>points thermometer at you
>oy vey you have a fever
>better inject you full of (((treatment)))
It is a cover.
Did anyone else get auto followed to Bill Gates on twitter. I Immediately unfollowed and left a what the fuck but only one other person seemed to feel me