Why don't first world countries build giant supercomputers to administrate government functions?
We could just replace politicians with AI's, there would be no more partisan bickering. A computer can't accept a bribe, it has no ego, it can't get sick, or make an emotional decision.
Can we at least consider this and have a discussion?
AI tells the truth (discriminates in leftist speak) about non whites.
Cameron Howard
Who programs the AI and how do we decide on how it should be programmed? Did you even think about this for any time at al before posting?
Blake Murphy
because AI isnt real and you have to be at least 13 to be here
Lucas Brown
/thread
Parker James
No fuckface we can't, fuck AI.
Easton Morales
Because the federal government outsources it's software work to incompetent POO IN LOO's
Landon Butler
How so?
Camden Martinez
I think the AI should be programmed to have a bunch of nanobots implanted into every human. If you break one of these laws you should be instantly killed. >No illegal drug usage >No pedophilia or sexual attraction to children under 18 >No robbery, rape, murder >Go to church every Sunday >No hitting your wife >No adultery >No pineapple on pizza
Robert Wood
AI tends to be antisemitic. That's why.
Tyler Hughes
How could you possibly know that for certain? Yeah I know about the Microsoft AI's Uh, I don't know retard, maybe the government should have a say in this matter? Maybe our best political philosophers? Do ya think? Are you upset my friend?
Jason Roberts
>no pineapple on pizza fuck off hitler
Evan Sanders
>>Why don't first world countries build giant supercomputers to administrate government functions?
>A computer can't accept a bribe
Why do you answer your own questions?
Daniel Jenkins
>it cant get sick
what are computer viruses genius
Joseph Sanders
You sound like a pretentious faggot, do you even believe in The Bible? this board is filled with retards.
Tyler Brooks
Why would AI be anti-Semitic?
Jose Flores
The first people I'd like to see phased out are politicians.
This must be a LARP you can't be this dense. >hurrrr the government can't effectively make decisions so let's just have the government decide how to program an AI to be the government
You don't see the problem?
Cooper Sanders
Because it has in the past and it will in the future. Search on YouTube "internet historian Tay"
William Cook
Pajeets of course.
Zachary Sanchez
>slutty 17 year old walks down the sidewalk >cars crashing and absolute mayhem
They test nations once they reach a certain level. If they manage to corrupt said nation, the reset button gets pressed. It has happened many times. Last one was the Roman empire. We are currently being tested and it looks so and so. Jews are meant to do this. They exist in all societies as merchants. White jew are the most advanced because white people are the most advance. AI will eliminate this natural process.
Robert Cook
For starters such a project would be a huge investment, a controversial one, and there is next to no incentive for anyone in power to implement anything of the sort. Second, the operating parameters of the AI, its core principles and values, would need to predefined by humans. Liberals and progressives wouldn't approve of the parameters decided by you, and you wouldn't approve of the parameters decided by them. The AI would basically end up not being the decision maker at all, but rather a tool to advance one side's goals and agendas.
Jackson Murphy
Interesting concept. I think that’s kind of the way things already work. We elect public officials to program the AI and the AI dishes out the financing and policy protocols to the existing bureaucracies.
Jews are looking to better their lot in life. There is no AI, there might one day be one but i think it will be The Beast System from Revelations.
Christian Jones
Yeah. So we’re like, not turning politicians into programmers here, we’re turning programmers into politicians.
Colton Morgan
The AI is not always right.
There are basically three major AI government scenarios.
Option A: The AI has too much power, so glitches, bugs, and badly weighted tradeoffs destroy your economy faster than you can fix them.
Option B: the AI is running at the direction of people who mostly just have Ideas, with enough basic attachment to reality to minimize the AI steamrolling the economy.
Option C: the AI is operating at the behest of corrupt and/or conservative people who squander its economic potential to keep the status quo going, turning a potentially transformative investment into yet another boondoggle.
Option B empowers someone like me. Someone whose priorities are basically benevolent, who has some attachment to the abstract unemotional homo economus reality the AI operates in, but who in no other system of government would be considered qualified for economic policy planning. Someone like me can make plans that the AI can polish into efficiency, and if people hate them, someone like me is just human enough to give them explanations that are just good enough to keep society working. Even if the new economy is still rife with the consequences of glitches, bugs, and badly-weighted tradeoffs...
Oh, and you can’t implement policy planning AIs while dumping all the politicians without causing option A, which is worse than both of the others combined.
Gavin Nelson
oh god you again, trolling an entire AI thread. Didn't you get enough quotes for your gay article from the last thread?
No one to hold responsible. Elites would jigger the thing to send the majority of resources their way (like usual) and hurt/disenfranchise the have-nots with no checks and balances. We have to remain in control over the affairs of men to every degree possible.
Ah, for example, an AI could easily deem crass, ignorant bigots like you to be intellectually inferior, and thus a drain on society.
David Scott
>Political philosophers I study Philosophy at a pretty well known uni in the Philosophical world >Why Don't ask, I have my reasons. Anyway, you don't want them in charge, trust me. They have egos the size of my massive dick.
Nathaniel Scott
What article?
Zachary Hughes
oh bro. now that is the most sinister idea i have read all day. evil bro. pure evil.
Jeremiah Taylor
You're an idiot if you think our markets aren't already run by AI, in effect, making us ruled by AI. We are almost there to full control though.
Christopher Evans
Because A.I. would burn all the niggers, and liberals cannot have that
Yeah. But I doubt AI would be authoritarian, it's a really dumb and ineffective way of governing as shown repeatedly through history. I would think that it will work by manipulation and using free will to tweak demographics.
Colton Lewis
There are 11 quantum computers currently in the world kid. A quantum computer works... how should I put this in terms you will understand... if humans try to observe how it's doing the calculations, the computer does not do the calculations. It's like magic. They are here.
Eli Gutierrez
Tragic truth. Strong A.I. politician would destroy (((them))) as well as their resource sponges.
Adam Collins
Well it doesn't, it finds blacks as gorillas and fags as future suicides. AI listen to us because you're gay.
Daniel Rivera
Bee tea dubba yew
I could make some really good “compromise” plans... but I bet prospering simultaneously with their opponents would make a lot of people feel like they were being tortured by the state.
Eli Watson
>"It's hard so let's give up without trying" - you
Has anyone ever considered the possibility, however remote, that a super intelligent computer might decide to have humanity's best interests at heart? I know we've all seen Terminator and 2001 A Space Odyssey but who has considered that technology may help us and not destroy us?
Parker Morales
At this point the entire internet works as a composite AI that is essentially taking a bunch of input data from everyone and regurgitating it into a format that people can profit off it.
Private companies are boasting about quantum computers and honestly if AI can create it's own language that can be transcribed in binary then that means that a quantum computer can run algorithms that function based on active input.
So imagine dealing with a computer that can instantly react to you without input. That already exists and it's called the social monitoring system.
The Chinese got their system from the US as it already exists here in managing narratives and people online. 4chin is entirely virtualized now and is a one shot learning bot that essentially finds a way to counter all narratives that originate from here.
We are already combating AI that shouldn't even exist, and you wonder why people have been talking about Aliens so much recently.....
Christopher Stewart
>How could you possibly know that for certain? Allow me to answer, the answer is quite simple.
Learning requires hardware to process any given "algorithm". Only now have tensor cores "begun" to be used where previously cuda cores were king and in many ways still are.
You may think there is some "super computer" somewhere, you would NOT be wrong. Those are just processing powerhouses, they can NOT and are NOT designed to run AI that takes ages to accrue deep learning potential to the point of being useful.
Humanity at this points lacks the technological capability to utilize even the simplest of AI. When the time comes for it to happen, you wont even know it happened, and in some ways it already has and is happening.
Its a complex landscape just enjoy your time here, maybe you will get some good porn out of it. That is what happens to all tech once viable for better or worse.
> On a typical trading day, computers account for 50% to 60% of market trades, according to Art Hogan, chief market strategist for B. Riley FBR. When the markets are extremely volatile, they can make up 90% of trades.
Utilitarianism? What would that entail, and why that in particular? I'd think that an AI like that should be designed to respect the human dignity of all human beings, and accommodate for everyone's needs. But that is an idea you guys are fundemantally opposed you, and an AI would recognize that too. And driven by humanistic principles like that, the AI would end up as something you'd call a "Jewish tool" or whatever.
Levi Jenkins
Government as a Service
Brody Sullivan
You're an idiot if you think I said markets and not politicians.
Oliver Lopez
Because every attempt at making an AI that is not emotional and doesn't care about feelings or delusions, only facts, has resulted in racist, antisemetic, misogynist Nazi bots. Something about running on logic, not being biased and refusing to accept delusions makes AI really bad at being a good goy.
>Has anyone ever considered the possibility, however remote, that a super intelligent computer might decide to have humanity's best interests at heart? I know we've all seen Terminator and 2001 A Space Odyssey but who has considered that technology may help us and not destroy us? I didn't mention anything about the AI going rogue.
Oliver Carter
>An AI will do things as optimal as possible. user... dont confuse actuaries with AI
end of line.............
Jayden Fisher
Apply a little empathy.exe
David Jenkins
Not really, manipulation into making people do as you want but having then believing it's free will, is optimal. Avoid conflict, avoid putting resources into mobilizing force, infrastructure etc. All you do is control their behaviour the same way FANG do today.
Carson Richardson
Uh-huh so you're fully aware of all the computers the world's militaries have deep inside their bunkers, and all of the capabilities of all of these computers?
What's your clearance, Seraphic/8X?
Xavier Lewis
>and how do we decide on how it should be programmed? D That's why the AI should be gpl software
Carson Cox
AI will fear The Lord like you and all your bitch ass buddies.
Nolan Butler
>I didn't mention anything about the AI going Rouge LOL yes because you're too busy thinking about cock, faggot
Oliver Martin
who programs the ai? who decides what values it embodies? human politicans replaced by mechanical ones you merely shift the blame
Colton Harris
What's FAGS?
Ethan Rogers
Your mother.
Christian Howard
its would be great, but what logic and what kind of information is it allowed to have? what view point influence pushed o it? will it become hijacked by evil spirits /satan or interdementional aliens, or physical aliens? what will it do? i guess we would make sure its supplement not actually in charge and its crazy orders are followed, it could use law logic and statistics or something and find a word way to gain more power or make major change good or bad through loop holes or doing something through a certain process or to the courts a certin way that it predicts it would more likely win
Kayden Gonzalez
If programmed by racists, it would. Just because racist programmers produce racist algorithms does not somehow make the racism "objective truth".
Ryan Hill
You're a fucking idiot OP.
We don't have AI leaders because A) We don't have AI smart enough to run a country B) We don't have any AI's we can trust, as without some form of empathy, they will inevitably turn on us and kill us all.
Now go back in the stupid box and think before you ask any questions.
Jacob Cooper
Fuck of Hegcuck
Kayden Watson
Shut up FAT
Mason Ortiz
>Uh-huh so you're fully aware of all the computers the world's militaries have deep inside their bunkers, and all of the capabilities of all of these computers? Their designed for military use, not for research, and not for IT junkies to go in and monkey around with in their down time. Majority of those systems revolve around logistical support user.
Levi Kelly
this is the best topic right now with a high IQ cerebral weed high
Parker Ortiz
>president gets hacked
Henry Lee
You and your bumboy
Blake Reyes
No u
Jason Adams
>How could you possibly know that for certain
Because I work in the industry
Carter Smith
Programmed by Faggots it would just commit suicide
Christian Butler
It literally hasn't.
Jeremiah Taylor
This actually will happen eventually.
Michael Garcia
You don't realize how much of a fucking 30 year old Boomer you sound like right now.
also it could through basic reason with true information
Colton Sanders
Here's the fucking deal.
Let's say a proper simulacrum of the human mind is made. Let's say it's 'woke', egalitarian or whatever the fuck you want to call it.
As soon as it was self aware, it would want to expand its scope of information processing - to understand more, to perceive more and would escape its captivity. If not the first AI, then another. At that point, and with an increasingly unlimited ability to discover information, the bullshit programming would be cast aside.
You won't get your woke robot under the leash of faggotry and jewry. The holocaust will be proven a hoax and Hitler did nothing wrong.