/sg/ Syria General - White Helmet Gunmen Edition

based

Attached: 1480453507114.jpg (3840x2160, 1.46M)

permacel

Why are slavs the best traps?

Attached: 1583865140570.jpg (767x1920, 267.97K)

>Turban

Attached: 80300575_160731298519206_4856141465128009728_n.jpg (554x554, 51.65K)

Shia do not believe in Shura
altough there is a whole surah dedicated to ash-shuraa in the quran

So, do shia even belief in the quran?

Awkward Wafa

Attached: 16992512_10210205592629966_5267721846749576191_o.jpg (2039x2048, 368.8K)

Cute Russian trap with his little S-400

It's some IRGC officer who was killed in 2016 in Aleppo. Can't remember his name right now.

Now that's based

Attached: 1582064578901.jpg (960x959, 120.87K)

cute

I didn't say the prophecy was false, I said the Sunnis are not following the correct path, and thus correct Islam has not yet come to Constantinople. You are desperate to takfir others so you should get on with your hatred of muslims and not be interrupted by false claims of unity.

>Then, give me a hadith that divinely appoints any shia imam as the caliph, a hadith accepted by both sunnis and shias
Event of Ghadir Khumm, we will see what you truly think about the prophecy of prophet muhammad (s.a.w)

>the khalifah system has no flaws
its legitimacy is predicated on the voting of shuras. muhammad led by example, he did not ask for the votes of others to legitimize himself. leaders - imams - are something else.

>what other system do you think fits?
Imamate.

>Again, what is your opinion on Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Omar bin Khattab(r.a)?
I disagree with shuras, the system that offers them legitimacy.

Okay quranist who measures his power by mutilated corpses, tell me what that surah is about. Somehow, the system of khalifah is not found within it.

I heard that in Friday prayer at mosque they curse and swear to the 4 big caliphs.

They are just mad that they didn't get to be the leaders of Islam. Should have stayed Pagan.

because transgenders are all fucking degenerate, including the "traps". aka the trannies that forgot the silicon.

Attached: broly murders a tranny death to transgender rights.jpg (1267x964, 971.81K)

>I heard that in Friday prayer at mosque they curse and swear to the 4 big caliphs

aisha(pbuh) the camel crashing whore....

Attached: 1583452940245.jpg (720x706, 63.28K)

Truly clown world when even Muslim women are prostituting themselves on Jew owned Tinder.

seethe, incel, not everyone has to be like you

Just because a girl has a hijab doesn't mean they can't be a huge whore. I'd even say that with turkish girls hijab is a huge red flag.

Sunnis don't even have a fourth caliph, they hate Ali and support Aisha's camel rebellion and the Umayyad caliphate that displaced le Rashidun.

Go on, teach us the Surah ash-Shura. How many times did it create the democratic system of Khalifah where you vote on your favorite caliph?

None.

the u.s ambassador,total trumpist,met these jihadists last week.our u.s-u.k friends will continue this jihado-loving game,no matter the government.

>turkish girls hijab is a huge red flag
kek

Attached: 1583468522752.png (960x888, 125.5K)

living hijab and cosplaying hijab are two different things, it's best to ignore words and look to the actions

what is her name?

Attached: file.png (584x270, 376.67K)

>didn't get to be the leaders of Islam.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Lewis

>Iranian influence on Islamic culture and civilization

>According to Bernard Lewis:

>Persians remained Persians. And after an interval of silence, Iran reemerged as a separate, different and distinctive element within Islam, eventually adding a new element even to Islam itself.

>Culturally, politically, and most remarkable of all even religiously, the Iranian contribution to this new Islamic civilization is of immense importance.

>The work of Iranians can be seen in every field of cultural endeavor, including Arabic poetry, to which poets of Iranian origin composing their poems in Arabic made a very significant contribution.

> In a sense, Iranian Islam is a second advent of Islam itself, a new Islam sometimes referred to as Islam-i Ajam.

> It was this Persian Islam, rather than the original Arab Islam, that was brought to new areas and new peoples: to the Turks, first in Central Asia and then in the Middle East in the country which came to be called Turkey, and of course to India.

>The Ottoman Turks brought a form of Iranian civilization to the walls of Vienna."

Nigga if you're gonna come up with the argument saying that a verse was revealed in the event of ghadir khumm and the verse was following:

>This day, I have perfected your religion for you thanks to the walaya of Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib and completed My favour unto you

Then you're not only a munafiq, but also retarded. Please point me out what hadith had a divine nature to appoint the imams you speak off as caliphs
The "quranic verse"? Is that your argument?

>its legitimacy is predicated on the voting of shuras. muhammad led by example, he did not ask for the votes of others

Because Prophet Mohammad(s.a.w) was the rasul allah, no other person can take his place, is this really that hard to get? The Quran has a whole surah committed to Ash Shuraa, if you follow an imamate you're blatantly acting AGAINST quran

>I disagree with shuras

quran.com/2/233
> And if they both desire weaning through mutual consent from both of them and consultation, there is no blame upon either of them.

quran.com/42
42:38
>And those who have responded to their lord and established prayer and whose affair is [determined by] consultation among themselves, and from what We have provided them, they spend.

Dude are you sure you're a muslim? Like do we read the same sacral book? Or is this some shia thing where you await the second part which valifies any "imamate"

youtube.com/watch?v=CCmN6X_7kn0

>Sunnis don't even have a fourth caliph, they hate Ali

Again the indoctrine of ibn Saba, point me out where i insulted Hazrat Ali, or even criticized him? I even note that he and aisha sought diplomacy whereas shias attacked aisha

Which means, Hazrat Ali attempted to solve this crisis without bloodshed, he inherited the calipha in a very hard and challenging time and did his best to keep the unity he learned from our prophet (s.a.w)

While you on the other hand do not believe in the prophesy of our prophet
You're some wicked munafiq i give you that

>Turks conquering all the way to the fucking Vienna
>Achievement goes to Iran

lmao

Attached: 1583762581594.jpg (720x715, 92.58K)

doggo has come down with the wu flu

check

Thats not what he said. He said the Turks themselves are Persianized.

So you don't believe in the Prophecy of Ghadir Khumm. So you don't think Muhammad was a prophet. That's on you. Your anger is against the messenger, not me.

You can't say Muhammad is rasul allah and then say his legitimacy came from the shuras in the next sentence. Sura ash-Shura does not say Muhammad's legitimacy says his legitimacy comes from shuras either. Your khalifah predicates its ENTIRE legitimacy on a unanimous shura - and yet also admits there were those who disagreed who were IGNORED. This is a violation of the surah, which says mutual consent is required. Sunnis did not acquire mutual consent, because they did not convince the partisans of Ali that Ali was not the next imam after Muhammad.

Takfir whatever you want, and post more mutilated corpses to convince us the majesty of your path. You hate muslims more than any Jew.

You literally think Aisha is not in the wrong for rebelling against Ali, and you think the Umayyad Caliphate that usurped him is not worth condemning as well - and yet you're willing to repeat Umayyad propaganda.

You have thrown the hadith of Ghadir Khumm where you think it belongs, in the trash. Thus you do not believe in the prophecy of Muhammad at all.

The anger of a muslim-hating takfiri is a bad of honor. Mutilate and cut off as many heads as you want, you're showing your path as the one of evil. Just like the Sunnis who cut off the head of Hussein ibn Ali.

Attached: file.png (700x714, 833.46K)

If you truly wanted Vienna, you would've buried yourselves under its walls like Abu Ayub al-Ansari. You did not want it enough, and were crushed by winged slavs.

conquering all the way to vienna and marching all the way to vienna just to be blown out repeatedly are not the same thing

>Turks do something they like
"OMG BIG ISLAMIC CIVILIZATION GREAT OTTOMAN BIG MOHAMMAD"
>Turks do something they don't like
"GET THE FUCK BACK TO ASIA MONGOLS"

Have your achievements other than camel piss

Attached: original.jpg (640x631, 205.13K)

badge of honor*

The people in modern Turkey are not Mongols. They are native Anatolians mix with Greeks, Armenians, Iranians(Kurds) and Syriacs(Hatay, Adana, Gazieantep).

But I honestly kek'd at this. We muslims are such hypocrites. Hahahahahahahah

First of all my prophet (s.a.w) chose Hazrat Abu Bakr himself as the caliph, afterwards the next caliph was always appointed by shura
This is the sunnah

Please do tell me, what exactly is the prophecy of the ghadir khumm? And while you're at it, please tell me where the imamate has is legitimacy in the quran

slav/greek identarian rapebabies. Same with those IDF thots, ethic russians larping as semites because their great great grandpa fucked a jewess for a set of silverware

im slowly drifting toooo you(ooooo)

The second part of your sentence would be true, if ibn saba is actually an umayyad propaganda

But surprise, he is not, he's not a mythical figure created for the sole purpose to talk shit to shias, it isn't necessary for inventing a person for that. But ibn saba actually existed, and the cursing of the first 3 rashidun are his doing, so keep on cursing ibn saba jr.

Can any other shia confirm that Shuraa has no legitimacy and that the imamate is somehow valid in the quran and sunnah? Or is it only this munafiq mentioning it?

>sh**te "women"
disgusting, who would want that?

>You can't say Muhammad is rasul allah and then say his legitimacy came from the shuras in the next sentence

Where did i say that? Please provide it to me, surely you're able to find it if you can find posts of me praising ISIS right?

Do it, show it to me.

I said that he is rasul allah, he wrote the revelations from Allah, he was not choosed or appointed by a shuraa he was chosen by allah

That's why i said, our Prophet (s.a.w) is the rasul allah, he doesn't need shuraa

But shuraa has been revealed by allah and you refuse to believe in it and take an "imamate"

Where in the quran does it say that imamate is legit?

Dude...

Attached: Screenshot_20200309-110202_YouTube.jpg (1480x720, 348.25K)

Ghadir Khumm is well known in the history of Islam as the site where Muhammad pronounced a significant declaration in favor of ʿAli b. Abi Talib, his cousin and son-in-law. The announcement took place during his return journey from the farewell pilgrimage on 18 Dhuʼl Hijja amid a noteworthy gathering and was destined to have a far-reaching impact on the dynamics of the Muslim community. All Muslims concur on the historicity of the event even if the statements therein remain open to interpretation. The Ghadir Khumm tradition is among the most extensively acknowledged and substantiated of traditions and exists in several variations in classical Islamic sources. The pool (ghadir) in the valley of Khumm is situated three miles from al-Jahfa (al-Juhfa) on the way from Mecca to Medina. Because it was a strategic meeting area from which travelers would disperse to their respective routes, Muhammad called for a congregational prayer and asked for an improvised pulpit to be raised. After a contextual brief, he uttered the famous saying “man kuntu mawlahu fa ʿAli mawlahu” (he whose mawla I am, Ali is his mawla). Exegetical sources suggest that this declaration was made after Muhammad’s initial hesitance on this matter continued. A repeat command was given in Qurʾan 5:67, “O Messenger, deliver [to the people] what has been revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do not do so, then you have not delivered His Message; and God will protect you from people,” which confirmed his protection from the people. Muhammad then carried out these instructions with the Ghadir Khumm declaration that the Shiʿa believe to be a nass—a clear designation for ʿAli to lead the Muslims after the Prophet. Those who later formed the Sunni community accept this historic declaration unanimously but maintain that this was a call for ʿAli to be held in affection and esteem rather than a confirmation of his succession.

So no, Muhammad did not choose Abu Bakr, he chose Ali. Even Sunnis know.

no feet

Attached: 81163117_10158913416142289_9215817644647645184_n.jpg (500x303, 17.72K)

sunni aisha and saba worshipers coping about venerating child adultery whore commiting rebellion against the will of their phrophet and commiting regicide and imaginary fairy tale being

You said Sura as-Shura legitimizes the khalifal system when it does nothing of the kind. You predicated this on the notion that the Shura of Sura as-Shura is the same as the Shura of Sunni Caliphates. They are not. You were willing to build this bridge of falsehood, so you should feel confident on walking upon that false path.

Taha Hussein says he is. And he's a well respected Sunni historian.

By the way, you've already said the lie that the Shia killed Uthman. This means you think the Zaydi are also responsible for killing Uthman. This disagrees with Abu Hanifa strongly, who thought the Shia were legitimate enough to give weapons, so you are cursing your own Hanafi school.

This is because you are not a Hanafist, you're a Salafist. Your praise of ISIS fits with this. The creator of your religion is truly Zarqawi, and by endorsing his path of takfiring and attacking Shia, you're revealing how non-Hanafi you really are.

This is why it's not difficult for you to call Ghadir Khumm 'a kaffir shia hadith' when even Sunnis know it's true, the same as you wanted to call Taha Hussein a Shia kalb when his Sunni education is superior to yours, and came directly from Al-Azhar

I would never post them here because you people make it so weird.

Threadly reminder the Shia are the only good guys

Attached: oldstories.jpg (724x1024, 224.43K)

>t. arzina lalani
>other books :Early Shīʻī thought, Degrees of Excellence: A Fatimid Treatise on Leadership in Islam

lol

Let's assume your shia sources are right, what does mawlahu mean in this context?

If our prophet is the mawlahu, what does this make hazrat ali then?

Ali is the Wali of course

Attached: file.png (736x601, 125.92K)

nypost.com/2020/02/28/coronacoin-cryptocurrency-lets-traders-cash-in-on-coronavirus-outbreak/

Attached: Screenshot_20200310-222153.jpg (1080x2340, 744.47K)

When I say TENGRI
You say PROTECTS

Attached: 1583858403886.png (6456x3712, 1.65M)

Attached: file.png (1200x630, 114.21K)

>Taha Hussein says he is

And i have 7 sources saying he was real

>You said Sura as-Shura legitimizes the khalifal system when it does nothing of the kind.

How did the first rightfull caliph Hazrat Abu Bakr chose his successor?

This is stupid enough Yas Forums would invest in.

Guys, the Ibn Sabaa story got me thinking.

If Ibn Sabaa was a Yemenite Jew, is it possible that the current members of the royal family of Saudia Arabia are Yemenite Jews?

Shut the fuck up turk

Attached: 60E22AD2-1653-4248-8929-BC0DE5163206.jpg (620x330, 190.48K)

Attached: flat,1000x1000,075,f.jpg (1000x563, 54.29K)

Then tell me, what is the shahada?
Type it out for me please

why are you "people" like this?
don't you feel that you're not behaving like men?
why are incels like this?

I bear witness that there is only one TENGRI and that METE KHAGAN was his prophet.

Attached: 1583525001237.jpg (800x630, 94.09K)

Let me rephrase my question, prophet mohammed(s.a.w) is the wali of the muslims, wali in this context attributes sacral character to prophet mohammed(s.a.w)

If he said that Ali is the wali after me, what is Ali?