Why is burning one flag worse than the other?

>Burning the very symbol of the place which allows you to have such freedom to burn it
Self-destructive retards.

>if u against thing u ackshually like thing! owned!

Hollywood and MSM are run by a bunch of perverted fags.

Freedom is something everyone is inherently born with. How are you "allowing" me to have freedom? That's so profoundly entitled. Only thing I can think of to liken it to is that gay Marvel movie, Guardians of the Galaxy, where the blue fag keeps trying to tell Peter Quill that he should be "grateful" that him and his shipmates didn't eat him.

And at some point Peter says "Normal people don't eat other people". And you know what? Same logic applies to you fags. Nobody is going to be grateful for you for NOT taking more of their fucking freedoms away.

Because one is punching up, the other is punching down.

Punching up would be criticizing the gay agenda because they have power of the law you retard.

Completely wrong interpretation of my comment. Not surprising, considering you are a conservative and likely illiterate. Earlier in the thread I stated specifically that I enjoy burning both of these fucking flags. I'm no fan of the gays myself. Instead, the reason I say people like that guy are closet homos are because he's proselytizing about "strength and national identity" under the banner of the flag. And that = literal homosexuality 95% of the time. Mix that with the fact that he referred to gay sex as "sodomy", which means he's likely religious, and you pretty much have a 100% faggotry rate, cuz GodCucks are almost always low key homos too. They're "submitting to the father" and "getting on their knees to worship him" and "putting his flesh in their mouth" (often while also on their knees) and all of that weird stuff, you know man? I mean religious people are vast majority latent homosexuals.

Attached: christianity.jpg (719x695, 119.66K)

>no gods, no masters
>respect muh gay pride flag, bigot

>"Normal people don't eat other people".
Normal people don’t fuck members of the same sex

Oh and “ok groomer”.

How do you know which one he was referring to?

who decides which caste is where in the hierarchy?

I bet you secretly want to fuck spiders

burning both flags is completely acceptable

>Freedom is something everyone is inherently born with
no it isn't

you don't know what faggot means. it involves what you're doing now.

That's true, but normal people also don't try to stop two other consenting adults from doing whatever they please in their own bedroom.

I hate both sodomy and national identity, wich white flag should I adopt

Because leftism is the dominant religion among the elites, burning one of their sacred symbols like the pride flag in 2020 is like burning a crucifix in medieval europe.

Attached: Dge-8uWVQAABUHJ-01.jpg (750x910, 86.29K)

It absolutely is. If a woman birthed a child into a vacuum he would have unmitigated freedom, until starvation began to set in. It's not a debate. You're "born free". The state and other humans / organism (if you wanna count parasites and bacteria and shit) are the ones that put restrictions on you and drag you down. Just a simple matter of how reality works. If you want to expect people to thank you, and be "grateful" that you're not fucking oppressing them, abusing them and acting tyrannically toward them then good fucking luck. Much more likely that attitude is going to spur people on to burn your fagflag and spit in your face. And by fagflag I'm NOT talking about the rainbow one but instead the USA one

Oh that old gag (argument).
Maybe if they kept their shit in the bedroom like they claim instead of indoctrinating children we wouldn’t give a fuck about them. Ok groomer?

Freedom is something that is either earned or given. You aren't born with it and your parents may give you it or you may eventually earn it.

You are clearly some sort of retarded ideologue that is under the impression that he was born with freedom rather than it being granted which means you are worthless to converse with.

How come the same establishment that protects you so much gets so butthurt about two consenting adults getting together to do White nationalism? How come they tell White people to stop reproducing for the environment?

Let's cut out the middle man here. Forget their stupid flag. Just burn homosexuals in the streets.

Attached: 1502840928964.jpg (779x708, 75.13K)

One more thing

You are free to leave. But you know that freedom isn't easy to find so like a petulant child with a permissive parent you rail against them as the world outside is too dangerous but you want to feel like you are relevant.

>only thing I can liken it to is that marvel movie

Attached: 1517215622495.png (201x250, 5.33K)

burning the flag is the proper way to dispose of it if it hits the ground or faggots touch it

Nah you're definitely born with it. End of story. You're just fucking completely proving me right. LMAO. WTF kind of retarded conservative logic is this. "You earn it" from what? From people? So there you go, lol, only other people infringe on your freedom. If other people ceased to exist in the world, and you were the only one left, you'd be 100% fucking free.

Jesus Christ, it's not a debate. You conservatives are just complete insufferable fucking morons.
IDK cuz gays on the left are the same as gays on the right and want to make rules for everyone else? That's the nature of the gay. You're gay, and you want to make rules for everyone else. When gays like you come out of the closet, they just start wanting to make a different set of rules. That's the subtle and complex, nuanced nature of our reality. One day you'll come out of the closet and the set of rules you want to impose upon the world will suddenly change. You'll stop caring about white nationalism, and start caring about crushing free speech. Oh wait. Hahahhahhahahaa silly me, you very likely don't care about free speech. Totally proves my point.

Also when you say "getting together to do white nationalism" LMFAO what exactly does that entail? Are we talking a gathering of like minded people going bowling? Or are we talking about pipe bombs in a niggers mailbox? Because if you can't figure out where the line is there, then IDK what to tell you, tardo.

That child isn’t free as the mother could kill it. You aren’t free if someone is capable of oppressing you. You are living free at their leisure.

Because nobody is going to get lynched for being American. Small, historically persecuted groups are at more risk than big, powerful groups. It's not rocket science.

Your post is the most Jewish post I've seen on this board in a long while.

Attached: 22DC50A87A6F4DB28997B7E304819175.jpg (469x344, 42.94K)

WTF is this shit. Listen it's not that complicated. Imagine everyone but you disappeared tomorrow. OK? Hypothetically. You'd then have total unmitigated freedom. That's because the restrictions on your freedom come from other people. Period. End of story. There is no debate about this. Why the fuck are you retards even trying to argue it? I swear to God, conservatives should get a special designation from the government, designating them only 2/5ths human. They are a shade below niggers.

It's not. Both are free speech.

Keep your freudian shit where it belongs.
The trash

Hate speech is free speech.

Both of these are considered morally reprehensible symbols attacking an idea. Neither one is illegal. Attacking the LGBT community is going after people who genuinely live their lives in fear, whereas burning the American flag attacks the richest country on earth in a more abstract way due to a disagreement with policy.

People who argue like you are women or faggots because making threats to a man’s sexuality is the only way you know how to

Why are you so stupid? YOU ARE FREE TO DO AS YOU WISH! You have absolute freedom already. What you fear however is the consequences of other people exerting their freedom of action. It’s a pointless argument as you would claim you don’t have freedom because a girl won’t let you fuck her. You would absolutely be the kind of dumb nigger with a bullet in his head if not for the law.

By nature of being human, we do not have unlimited freedom. Just being trapped inside our bodies slowly careening toward death with no escape is one of the biggest restrictions the soul can have.

user, who hurt you?

Tribalism you stupid subversive

Both is forbidden in germany

user, by this logic, you could pass any tyrannical law and just say "you have freedom bro, I'm just gonna shoot you in the back of the head if you break this arbitrary law". Like come on. "Conservatives" are fucking braindead, man.

I only hate gays that earn more money than me

We need "assault on a patriot" laws where you are punished harsher for stealing someones american flag or magahat than if u stole a hitler hat or a BLM hat

Yes, a great way to celebrate a free county.

By adding laws to force people into supporting that free country. All of the most free countries on the planet definitely have had those, ask the people in the gulags.

Cause sticks and stones may break your bones but words will never hurt you... unless you’re a faggot.

Soiboy, woman, or troll?

Attached: Redditspeak.jpg (1500x1000, 376.35K)

You are arguing several different definitions of freedom and switching between them to argue semantics. This is why kikes have been kicked out of so many countries and everyone wants them dead. You can’t reason with them and they only respond to force.

The people that it would punish are the ones that unironically want gulags.

Attached: 1438556462463.jpg (2272x1704, 465.71K)

Fat white niggers like hypocrisy

Yeah no that''s not happening. You just made 100% made that up.

>THIS IS JUST LIKE MUH FAVORITE MAVEL MOVIE WHERE THE GUY DID THE THING
Ok reddit

Attached: 1582647986831.jpg (191x264, 7.51K)