Who knew mr Bean was this based?

Who knew mr Bean was this based?

Attached: row.jpg (600x338, 42.48K)

>muh human rights
if you hate Muslims because they're filthy savages, fine, but if it's because >muh women >muh gays, cringe and bluepilled.

Who is Mr. Bean to say what's wrong and what's right.

religion decides what's right and wrong, to cherry pick it's morality scale is to denounce the weight of the morality standard in the first place, thus, you denounce the concept of right and wrong.

Kek Yas Forums aligns with like 90% of Islamic teachings.

>cherry pick it is morality

>nyoooooo you cahn’t simply oppress poofs it’s wroooooong

He was from outer space. Pretty sure they have a more profound understanding of morality.

based

Reminder that mr bean’s character is a deranged pill head and not a lovable spacker

Is he talking about kikes? Freemasonry? Utilitarianism/Atheism?

Normal actions but an inbred guy

Mr. Bean has always been based but he's boomer based only. He doesn't understand that Islam is right about women and fags.

>human rights
spook

about everything*

Fixed

unironically Islam would be great if not shitskins and their disgusting sand """language"""

Attached: epicurus-on-god.jpg (556x380, 32.34K)

HOLY FUCK!!!!! He said THAT about Judaism?!

Mean

checkmate atheists!

Well, islam would be pretty based if not that all gay Muhammad and Allah shit
And shitskins, so like 70% i guess.

>religion
double spook

This.
Women are nothing but meat holes that should be treated as pets and gays deserve to be skinned alive.

t. closet homo

Attached: qqaibflj3tv11.jpg (660x880, 135.87K)

Evil is a spook.

Mr. Bean is Christian.

Attached: 1415015715448.webm (458x468, 2.49M)

And yet I guarantee he wouldn't make the same generalisations based on race. These milquetoast faggots are the worst.

>Anglos in charge of morality
Lol

I really miss the days before pearl-clutching fundie polcels who love to larp as pious took over Yas Forums.

that' a lot of big words

>pol school of false equivalence

because adhering to a doctrine is exactly the same as having skin color lmao.

They want you to believe they've always been here and that they just "grew up" or some shit.

>muh human rights
What have women ever done to deserve them?

Attached: degenerate thots.webm (720x404, 1.99M)

>muh 'skin color' fallacy

Nice strawman retard

yes this place always been a liberal safe space

You can have a christian black or a muslim black or an atheist black

While a single religitard are all going to be the same.

>unironically Islam would be great
no more vidya games. 95% of movies/tv/books gone, same for music. science deleted, progress halted. history revisioned. individual freedoms abolished. but at least you get a designated aisha so there's that.

You wouldn't know either way.

lol ok ben shapiro, nice imaginary world you live in

>no more vidya games. 95% of movies/tv/books gone, same for music
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOI

Attached: 85FC581A-5E6D-4575-8D65-07DD31CB8707.png (572x693, 49.53K)

Fuck r you talking about

He never said that.

Not everything is wahhabism user and these types were mocked even centuries ago.

Still Islam is shit compared to Catholicism

I've seen things you newfags wouldn't believe pool closed because of aids, boomer loosing his shit in front of his webcam because his daugther was "hacked",...
All these momentd will be lost in time like the sperm you gargle.

How does this quote fit with how the Greeks viewed God though? Their gods were neither omnipotent nor willing to prevent evil. The Greek concept of what a god it doesn't include those attributes necessarily.

The quote is most likely not from Epicurus

You'd normally be right, but lately, racial/sexual/cultural identity is a lot like religion.

I hope he's talking about every religion and not just the one he's not part of.

>implying Plato wasn't monotheistic

>implying Plato didn't worship the Forms

Muh perfect triangle. Fucking hack.

Plato is gay

Attached: 1280px-Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg (1280x1713, 280.34K)

horseshoe theory and all that

what horseshoe? Yas Forums is incredibly right wing. islam is incredibly right wing.

Wrong, left/right wing are Christian terms.

the word you're looking for is "conservative" that's not the same as right wing

trying to identify politics on a one-dimensional spectrum is about as smoothbrain as you can possibly be.

>nooooo stop standing up for free speech

No, they are french political terms. Right being monarchists and left being anti monarchist republicans. Literally comes from where they were seated.

Based.

Racial psychological differences are as stark as physical differences and are genetic. You're retarded of you haven't figured this out yet. I mean you even kind of allude to it by lumping sexual differences in with racial. Men and women are vastly different psychologically due to biology. Therefore biology plays a huge role in psychology. Therefore racial groups who evolve to be completely different biologically would obviously evolve to be completely different psychologically. Hence niggers behave like animals because they are born that are and "culture" is just an excuse

There's nothing morally wrong with being dumb or event violent.

>he doesn't understand the metaphor

>atheists confuse morality with social acceptibility #204820183083019038292

>proving him right

>monarchists
Christian monarchists

What metaphor

Dumb? No
Violent? Depends. Are you talking about randomly violent? That's morally wrong

>what metaphor
the right and left hands of God

>AtheistRepublic
Lol, he was referring to a law that would have made it illegal to ridicule any religion, including ones like Satanism/Wicca/etc. So that would lead to abuse of that law where anyone could just claim that a religion they don't like is ridiculing their own, effectively banning free speech.
Only fedoras would use that particular sentence out of his entire speech.

>hating religion

Hi Shlomo/reddit

>conceptualizing god as a person
mental midget

it's literally what they did and why they sat where they sat

Like when atheists say there's nothing inherently bad about killing humans as a justification for abortion?

what are you talking about

are you feeling alright user? I'm talking about what you're talking about.

I'm not that user.

So then you have trouble reading or what? What's with the dullard act?

I'm just replying on the user (you I'm assuming) contextualizing god as a person.

so you're just jerking yourself off then, as I've already explained the context of why I made that post.

This is true, but the application is different

No you didn't. You talked about left and right being christian terms, then some user corrected you on it being french in origin. Then you said something about it being a metaphor and then I said you're a mental midget for conceptualizing god as a person (form).

That wasn't me, all I did was ridicule the user who recognized the historical but not religious context. You sure you're alright, user, no blows to the head lately?

>tfw Christian Socialist
>hate the right for being money-grabbing mega-jew neocon bankers who pander to racists while passing more laws that screw over the poor and let international billionaires steal more money
>hate the left for being anti-Christian degenerates who support killing babies, gay marriage and safe schools where innocent children are brainwashed to become trannies and fundamentally attack the morals of society

This is why I hate politics and checked out of it. It's led by the same people with the same (lack of) principles. Better to just focus on bettering your own life

Let me guess... he’s not talking about Jews or Muslims or Hindus

How much you wanna bet everyone saying things like "shitskins" itt are the same people advocating the fall of Israel

Based pseud. Plato and Aristotle believed in monotheistic Gods with a capital G

>nooooo just ignore “the one” muh Plato isn’t a christcuck!!
Cope

Read Ellul and Tolstoy and just take the Christian anarchist pill. Politics should not be of a truly religious persons concern

>spacker can't suss out a joke
color me surprised

Oc not, it would require balls and honesty.

Is Epicurus arguing in favor of no gods, or of gods not adhering to Plato or Aristotle's definitions?

Haven’t heard “spacker” in a while

>advocating the fall of Israel

What's wrong with that

You are not a good person. I hope you know that.

Very confused by the use of spacker but then the non-english spelling of colour

I don’t think “atheism” in the terms we know today existed back then. He probably wasn’t denying some sort of creator (even hardline materialists like Lucretius don’t line it out as a possibility) I think he’s just arguing against a personal God like Plato’s God of love and goodness. Don’t know about Aristotle since for him God was essentially just a being which contemplated itself

the u on my keyb is busted

>advocating the fall of Israel
>implying that's a bad thing
Seethe more heeb

I knew he was based the moment I was introduced to Black Adder.

OH SAY CAN YOU SEEEEE

yes it is....

Let’s see
peaceful, neutral religions
>Christianity
>Buddhism
>Hinduism
whacko murder religions
>Islam
>Judaism
Mr. Bean knew what he was saying.

what's even more bizarre is that many feminists and gay activists defend Islamism and claim that it's a religion of peace and more torelable than Christianity

What I’m going to do to you? If you’re bad you go to hell, if you’re good you go to heaven. What did Jews mean by this image?

All religions are violent, because the people following them engage in violent acts in the name of said religion. Doesn't mean that religious people are all violent of course.

thanks professor

This, Jesus Fucking Christ.

By extension that means all politics is violent as well

What’s wrong with Hindus?

Ask them to explain how a religion which is centered around worshiping a man who waged over 50 wars, enslaved people, committed myriad of atrocities, married and had intercourse with a prepubescent, and established the market cost of black people as slaves to be beneath all other races in the Hadith, is peaceful.
Their logic is same as saying you can be a peaceful Nazi without considering Hitler and his gang who invented it.

So is the English language, and being a faggot like you.

It is. Not even in the 'war is the extension of politics' way.

Hindus actually kill a lot of people, especially recently. I don’t have an issue with them however, I’m just pointing out how nobody questions it because they’re not white

What are you fucking talking about? When was the last time fucking Christians went to war over some stupid shit? A thousand years ago? That might as well be fucking legends. Muslims and Jews are blowing each other up because (????) to this fucking day.

I grew up in a Christian community. Nicest people/neighbors you could ever have. My bosses and their family who own a chain of hotels are Hindu (and they like Trump lmao). Great peoplez

No I didn’t mean it like that. It fundamentally relies on the use of civil force and bullying or manipulating people into letting “your side” have control. It’s extremely violent

Lol, africa is full of 'Lords protection army' retards killing in the name of the christian god.
>inb4 not real christians

>Hindus actually kill a lot of people, especially recently.
Yeah, they are killing colonizers and slavers who invaded their region and created chaos in it for the past 1200 years - Muzzies.

Ikr
it's not only a violent religion since its very beginning,but many brainless liberals defend it while criticising Christians.....
It's the fattest growing religion of all....
We are doomed

It's not bizarre, it's standard daddy issues. "You're such a dickhead, Dad, you voted for Trump and go to church and JUDGE my tattoos and riding the cock carousel - I'll show you, i'll convert to Islam, because you're always complaining about them!" *door slam*

Fuck 'em. They're lost to the civilized world converting, let them die with the rest of the death cult. There are some lines that can't be uncrossed, and the death cult is one of them.

Alright. Non-African Christians then.

>compared to catholicism
get your desert religions out of here

you need to start geting your info from someplace else than vice

Yeah exactly, though it's obviously not physical in nature. It's also inescapable, unless you want to go full Rousseau and basically do away with modern society.

>love, charity, forgiveness, treat others how you want to be treated
Fuck, the teachings of Christianity are such fucking cancer huh bros??

Barbaric cow worshippers who chimp out and kill people for eating beef

this
too bad none of them end up being killed by one of those camel fuckers from this so said """tolerable""" religion

if you actually look into some of the "hip" religions like rastafari, buddhists or hindus you'll quickly find they're actually pretty insidious

lol cucktian believes this

Well fair enough I guess but cows are absolutely sacred to them for whatever reason.
I always feel bad when I’m eating a meatball sub or something when Hindus I work with are around. Does it piss them off? I can’t say.

Full on religious wars arn't really a thing anymore. Even religious conflict in the middle east, asia and the sub continent is more geopolitical driven. Terrorist acts however are very much a method of religious extremism. And none of the big ones have clean hands here. Neither the abrahamic or eastern ones.

Christianity is more than just Jesus quotes

>All religions are violent
False Equivalence of an uneducated mind.
You have to prove that there is an inherent inability of a religion to pacify itself if you want to make such mentally bankrupt claims.
Like for instance establishing what the central and only important role model component of a religion is without which one can't be called a practitioner while every other component can be ignored, and comparing it with others.
In Christianity it's Christ,
in Islam it's Muhammad.
Two wildly different figures.
One a pacifist hippie faggot who couldn't even write let alone wage war.
The other a total warmonger akin to African warlords.
Therefore one had Enlightenment and self-pacification movements, while the other can never have any of the aforementioned because it's defined by worshiping a warmonger savage.
Clearly there is no equality here no matter how you try to spin it.

It's not, which is why it's called Christianity.
It's not, and that's why it had self-pacification movements.

Um, yeah. I was literally indoctrinated into it and I wouldn’t even say I’m religious I don’t go to church or anything but the entire church community I grew up with, Sunday school etc. are the most wholesome people I’ve ever met in my life. I’ll probably never go to church again because it’s so boring but I’m definitely gonna send my kids to Sunday school to learn some fucking morality.

Eh why bother caring about the mentally ill hiding behind religion.
The real based shit is when Atkinson laid into sjw's and the forever oppressed types for stifling free speech and being unable to take a joke. Lookup "The new intolerance"

Literally the only reason why the catholic church isn't still propagating another european war every decade is because secularists took away that power from it

Fuck off Lex

And the Secularist were another Christian denomination which pointed out that Christ would never approve of mixing state and church because it is Paradoxal to his way of life, words, and pacifism, which shattered Western Europe into a war between religions denominations fighting to keep a corrupt Catholic church out of state and political matters. Again, the point you were trying to make?

Christianity is the best religion. Islam is 2nd. Everything else can fuck off

Yas Forums huh?
it’s been years...
Also
>no tab for monarchist
Wtf?

get off this board leftist pseudo intellectual faggots

13% of the British Empire yet responsible for over 50% of its crime stats.

based

where did this thread get moved from? /lit/ or Yas Forums?

From Yas Forums
Its the new Yas Forums

Atheism has no future.

Attached: 1580818505801.jpg (891x960, 157.9K)