Why is open borders so unpopular? Imagine being able to travel and live anywhere in the world

>Imagine being able to travel and live anywhere in the world
A great thought. Until everyone tries it out and soon everything is so similar there's no more reason to travel.

Attached: 1436978693021.png (871x900, 210.43K)

>Firsties become poorer
>Thirdies become richer
>There are more thirdies than firsties so the world is wealthier

This won't happen. In reality:
>firsties become poorer
>thirdies stay the same
>owning class firsties and thirdies morph into a global ruling class that becomes exponentially wealthier than the masses

They have this false assumption that every man is equal.

this is some retarded line of thought

>idealistic idea
>ignores all problems and downside
Ah yes

Everyone will start hiring balngadeshis and indians for 200$ monthly salary

you cant create wealth
you can only relocate it

Attached: 15-08-Bull-Crap-Lampoon-the-System-800.jpg (800x600, 619.91K)

So we have the same wealth as in 1200AC?

They don't? The difference between humans is the basis for the division of labor. Adam Smith talked about this like a century ago.

Why is it so hard to understand some countries don't create wealth, only poverty?

I've always wondered this.
Can't you just sell something back and forth between two people to increase gdp indefinitely?

Kenyan economists don't seem to understand that wealth is subjective.

>for 200$ monthly salary
So in Russia nothing really changes? Let's do it then, let the f*rsties suffer.

That means every shitskin traveling to developed countries, staying and sucking up resources. Holy fuck anyone who advocates open borders for any nation should be shot.

Wealth is the value of a persons belongings
value is always proportional
lets say that a nobleman had a wealth of 1% of a nations wealth
and a modern Business man has wealth equivaklent of 1% of the national wealth
their wealth is equivalent its just that the goods they own differ because of technological progress
so yes
wealth is a useless measurement here
allowing people to move around doesnt create anything

not quite but you can increse gdp artificialy

>This thread was moved to

Attached: 1582590410536.png (596x687, 87.53K)

GEE I WONDER WHY
I WONDER WHY CORONAVIRUS IS SPREADING LIKE FIRE
I WONDER WHY CRIMINALS CONTINUE TO JUMP FROM JURISDICTION TO JURISDICTION
I WONDERY WHY NIGGERS MOVE TO A GOOD COUNTRY AFTER SETTING THEIR OWN ON FIRE

Honestly OP I’m always amazed there is someone so low IQ, so fundamentally retarded about how the world works, that they don’t understand the necessity of borders. Thank you for showing me once again, that faggots as stupid and useless as you exist.

Open borders would only create a nomadic lifestyle where a class of people would travel to fresh land, use all the wealth until the area is destroyed by there parasitic presence and then move onto new greener pastures letting the area they destroyed recover from the hard work of the people they impoverished with their presence.
This lifestyle is not new, we have seen it since the dawn of man, the selfish and shortsighted band of nomadic barabrain retards ruining civilisations as they pass though.
Economists like this just want to be gypsies or irish travelers but bigger. The wealth of the planet carried upon the little nomadic communities of elites stolen from the communities they travel to and abuse.

>let Mexicans work for money under the table, completely untaxed while using tax funded services like food stamps
>somehow this makes an entire planet of money

>Why is open borders so unpopular?
Think about it.

Attached: SICK.png (966x1248, 1.75M)

Mass immigration has done enough damage. Pic related.

Attached: ows2d.png (1766x1881, 1.58M)

>somehow this makes an entire planet of money
It's called inflation.

This assumes there will always be gibs\NGOs providing relocation expenses.

That is not the case. Once white people are eliminated, the "elite" will move on to openly enslaving the writhing brown mass of humanity.

Attached: [email protected] (2505x1692, 3.63M)

What would happen if white people move to a brown country and then demand welfare, and call the existing power structure racist for being almsot entirely brown?

Attached: 2012c.png (2434x2110, 1.09M)

It raises the income of third worlders for sure, but it would lower the income of first worlders.

Net gain, but a negative for citizens of developed countries.

This is why.

Attached: The Facts on Immigration.png (849x3662, 344.4K)

No. Illegal labor is not 'inflation'. Inflation is the exact opposite of 'creating wealth'.

The poster raises a real point: how is brining useless people to the midst of useful societies and then giving them $ to replace the existing useful people going to cause a real increase in GDP?

Also, fuck GDP.

Attached: 1578336541910.jpg (720x1113, 124.12K)

>but it would lower the income of first worlders.
It has already done a massive number of working class "first worlders"

Attached: 1581243658475.png (563x432, 75.37K)

Based and imperialism-pilled. The only way to grow is to conquer

It is so ridiculous to expect relocating useless people from the third world into 1st world settings to do anything except fuck up first-world settings.

These people pushing it don't believe in it themselves - they just like money from bankers.

Attached: 1579453746624.png (1658x2334, 489.71K)

That's probably due more to globalist free trade than immigration itself.

> gdp

The people coming to europe atm aren't what the comic is talking about. They don't work legally, don't respect the laws and culture of the host country and in general aren't an economic benefit, but a money sink. And that's on top of the social costs, like new year's eve in cologne for example. Open borders is unpopular because it doesn't work as advertised and people are beginning to notice. I hope it isn't too late before we start reversing the effects of mass migration from the middle east and africa.

Are you one of those terminally retarded americans?

>allowing people to move around doesnt create anything
It certainly destroys a lot though.

Attached: 1578608091791.jpg (968x681, 113.97K)

>gross world product
Statistics deflection pumping GDP through population displacement without any real production increase occurring.

Not sure if completely retarded or intentionally dishonest stock market speculator. Only a complete retard would fall for it though.

Attached: cheerio.gif (230x158, 583.19K)

>That's probably due more to globalist free trade than immigration itself.
Its the same thing. Not even 2 sides of a coin - THE SAME.

The methods used to disenfranchise the working class heirs of the western countries have been overlapping, intense, long-running, and brutally sucessful.

Attached: 1581734453800.png (1008x954, 631.97K)

because jews use borders to exploit the wealth gap between nations and currencies

Think of it like India but on a global scale. The GDP is massive but it's still really really poor. Let anyone live anywhere would create the same situation. Wages would plummet but the aggregate GDP would be more.

It's a terrible idea.

>intentionally dishonest
The entire global economy is a scam now - it's main goal in 2020 is to enable the (((great replacement))). That is all it exists for currently. Just look at it!

Attached: 1581219952342.jpg (696x6773, 1.26M)

Not exactly. Competing with a factor woker in Vietnam isn't the same as that person moving to the US and competing there.

>because jews use borders to exploit the wealth gap between nations and currencies
All business people do that. It is just logical\smart.

Jews take it the next step and mix it into their 2000+ year old quest to 'save the world' by 'enslaving everyone'...

Attached: 1579475436411.jpg (460x550, 66.11K)

>Imagine any piece of shit in the world being able to travel and live near you without restriction or resistance.

Fuck off Kike

Ah yes because money is the most important thing. Just give up your culture and people its okay because at least you have money. Oh, your daughter was raped by a gang of feral niggers? Well at least you have money! You know you sound like a kike right?

Attached: 76546048-E650-4759-B450-D4BC8F7E9020.jpg (731x454, 311.12K)

Imagine going anywhere on the planet and everything is exactly the same. Open borders kills diversity.

because as in the pic OP posted it relies on the false notion that mass immigration/globalization will bring about people with skill sets that are needed elsewhere rather than people with no skills that will rely on public aide to live. Whoever thinks there will be a sudden influx of skilled laborers is grossly mistaken

that is the most jewish cartoon i ever saw

They never cared about diversity.

Who moves for minimal wage? Retards?

Jews want this (except Jizzrael, of course). That’s reason enough to oppose it.

Das rayciss!

>Why is open borders so unpopular?
this are why

>Not exactly. Competing with a factor woker in Vietnam isn't the same as that person moving to the US and competing there.
It is the same in the following important ways:

> In both cases your local labor is devalued by the internationalists access to cheaper labor and legal ability to procure it
> In both cases you are competing agaisnt people who are not subject to the same requirements as you (expensive college, good credit scores, verifiable background, clear criminal record, real actual identity someone can really truly verify)
> The lower cost labor is done at the expense of generations of your families contributions to the society.
> The lower cost labor's greater profit margin is completely eaten up by managers\owners\stock buybacks\etc.
> The lower cost worker is less able to stand up for themselves in any way
> The foreign worker has no serious civil\cultural ties to the market the products they make are sold in.

It goes on and on. Most of all and above all:
> That cheaper labor exists only to harm the existing higher cost labor.

I dont think you understand how much the western world has changed. There has been the ability to launch mass-immigration for 200 years. It was resisted by local leaders who didnt want to ceede power to bigger fish.

Now the little fish are all born of the bigger fish. There are no real little fish', just big ass angler fish.

Attached: 1578670456352.png (624x683, 442.1K)

>worse than psychologists

That's pretty bad Fren

>They never cared about diversity.
Yes, (((they))) do. They have convinced themselves diversity is THEIR strength against us.

It is a war\politicla tactic as old as language\tribes: dilute the existing group so your group can take over.
Toddlers come up with this to fight over toys.

Attached: 1578416743067.png (500x515, 119.99K)

It only benefits corporations that would exploit cheap labour. The citizens of the country with open borders would be paid less and would have to pay more for housing. Public services would be far less accessible, as in hospitals and schools.

Assuming you are not trolling...

Im pretty sure you have never been anyplace. Most places suck. I certianly dont want people from most places where i live especialy if they want to inport the shitty cultures the came from

Found the BOOMER

>Economists are actual retards
>Worse than Psychologists
They are in the same sort of position where a good 85% of what they claim\push is status-quo propaganda covering for an inherently broken system.

Attached: econ1.png (1766x2281, 1.32M)

A based Swede. Very Rare.

She's a BOOMER

You boiled that sauce down quite nicely.

Economic (((science))):
>Let take an extremely oversimplified model of the world
>Let now use this model to predict an extreme situation, far beyond what our model can predict
>Let now use our predictions as an undisputable truth to impose politics

No economical model was ever able to predict anything. You can just look after something happen which model was correct. Pure serendipity.

> Imagine being able to travel and live anywhere in the world
Again, that's the theory. But in practice, an open border means an extreme pressure on the wage of most people... and the obligation to move where the job is!

Attached: ted.jpg (190x265, 10.01K)