Why do women feel threatened by each other?

This. Tribal humans didn't have marriage, so prettier women would get more resources from more men.

the harder one works on makeup the harder the others must makeup and it doesn't get easier for anyone, men created this btw

even if men created it, women are perpetuating it with masochistic glee.

Kate looks 45. Meghan doesn't.

Meghan can't hold a candle to Kate

William knows good stock, Harry loves trash.

Attached: 927_1000.jpg (565x1000, 102.87K)

meghan looks like shes taken at least 45 cocks. Kate doesn't.

because they know Chad can only be married to one woman at a time

Around blacks

Has nothing to do with being a woman. Around blacks, never relax. Just didn't want her purse stolen.

Do u think tga the based ginger are feeling threatened by a negro woman?

when it comes to the current victim hierarchy sure, but in reality kate is in the cosy position when it comes to monarchistic hierarchy, which is all that counts.

>meghan looks like shes taken at least 45 cocks
Lucky girl.

Cause niggers are not human. Monkeys beg for attention

Because deep down all they are trying to do is get the best seed in the room in their pussy.

Kate is a lady. Other is a fas sheboon

Meghan is a moron who wants to star in cape shit while Kate goes all in on the lady crap. All women want attention but Meghan clearly blew it and partially ruined it for Kate.

Meghan is pretty, shame shes such a cunt

if you were female, you would know that at her age having 45 cocks in you is a laughable low number.
the only humans that have more partners then females are gay men.

the same reason two strange cats dont like each other.

the point wasn't the amount of cocks the yacht whore had you retard it was how few kate had

Boom

Because ((they)) have successfully managed to get parents to raise girls as highly competitive bitches by teaching them that they are only worthy if they are perfect in every way. So if a girl sees another girl who might be better in one category, instead of being happy for that other girl, she needs to destroy her or her own worth is on the line. Don‘t let them use you for their ways and accelerate the hate between us.

"few"

even a future king cannot have a virgin bride kek

I am just saying that 45 cocks is an avarge of a spring break and 2-3 semesters aka not even trying. If a woman tries or goes pro. The numbers start going in their hundrads, and at Megs age and line of work, could reach thousands. oddly enough women that do porn get fewer dicks on avarge.

yeah for fucks sake what a shambles the monarchy is in, even allowing the whole duchess nigger spectacle is embarrassing but probably just an orchestrated distraction .

i wouldnt be surprised if 3/10 chicks hit triple digits by 20 at this stage mate

>Kate is a lady.
Dont act like she isnt still a wahmen and therefore a hypergamous whore.

Monarch in the streets, commoner in the sheets.

kek, you tradcucks are easily fooled

arent you a dramatizing fag? fags, to get into hundreds, need to literally fuck 24/7 all new guys. Women like to be lazy slob princessas. Do you think they fuck every day or every friday night with a new dick? Do they find 50 new chads per Year? I think 5 at most, blowjobs included,
as their inherent fatigue and laziness brings them down.

well, can't say about the whole world, but in my area all girls move to bigger cities and downs at the age of 14 to go to post primary schools. They all live in dormitories or ,if the parents are real rich, in private houses. Triple digits is something, I would say, a large number of girls reach by the end of 15th birthday. By the time they are 18+ even a nun novice would be at least in double diggits

well he did nab her at a younger age, and she being rich does mean she wasn't ridding every dick she could get. Rich women and girls tend to be very picky as far as that goes.

because women know what goes on in a womans head. its also the reason for the ridiculously over the top "all women are powerful, capable, and can do anything" meme that gets trotted out every international womens day - they must present a united front or the whole thing falls down because of biologically ingrained insecurity.

>women are too lazy to be efficient whores
jej

go to spartacus in warsaw in the 90s. lets say 2 dudes per night, which by gay club standards isn't that much. 4 times a week, you get 182 dicks in first year of going to clubs. no orgies, no partners, just going to club and acting like a conservative fag.

>Why do women feel threatened by each other?

Women understand Women.

Attached: 85163615.jpg (540x720, 48.42K)

God that mulatto is hideous.

I would pay monies to watch Kate smother that mutt in a pit of mud.

>Rich women and girls tend to be very picky as far as that goes.

i mean maybe poland is just completely different but believe me when i say that in ameriland, this is an extremely false statement

Attached: 1515979827724.png (512x367, 50.72K)

true. and anyone who doesn't trust people on the interweb, rightfuly so, can go ask their moms and sisters, what do they think about having a female and male boss. or if it is better to have female or male co workers.

Well its all theater, whos gonna react first. whos gonna start a discussion. how will you counter. will you start the next discussion.

look at that plastic nigger trying to look white

Y hey both look like shit. Kate looks like below average gringa with dark hair and smaller eyes and Meghan is a average mulata who is divorce and who best years are behind.

I've always wanted a BJ from a woman with a split tongue

Trust me, rich ladies are picky, they just doen't seem picky from a male perspective. Compare a hood rat, to a lets say queen B. I can assure you that the queen fucks less.

Attached: W5LtFUPm6g71mmYcMs1MQ4JNyZLL96XPz8xoxDKESnPp3j1HbPJnTyupCU2thAQvqgXGwcf57RYyxw9xVU66M7X17BFCNgPLJfSsKwhKb2v4eUz9YBBBgkDeYrh6LiBcZJen2p3QW9ETDhK5k7wjkctHnJcyL.jpg (625x430, 56.51K)

To give you a perspective. a dude who had 200 partners is a mega chad. a woman who had 200 partners at 25, is considered rather conservative. Or maybe not interested in sex with people.

This is now officially the Markle continuation thread.

Post Grace-chan for extra points.

Wow, so polish women really are whores

Attached: Bh8UlPMg.jpg (728x1067, 118.76K)

Insanity of faggot unveiled.
4 nights a week assblasted then going to work at 8am. Waking at 6.30-7. Literally no woman can have a half of that regimen. At most a quarter. At most for 3-4 years of early studying.

Still, 50 dudes per year, with 0 other free time on Friday/Saturday spend NOT on netflix, eating or drinking cheap wine with "friends". Too much. 1 a month. 12 dudes a year, including blows and hands, if she fucks every time.
I know a reasonable amount of young libertine women and they rarely do this at this ratio.
basically this.

I woyldnt be surprised if that number is around 5 total yearly, including 2-1 boyfriends per year.

Reminder, just say no to thots and e-thots. That is all.

your probably right to be fair, boyfriends or orbiters pay out more on a yearly basis, but there are countless chads prior during or in between all of the betabux which would pad the numbers some

it is not just polish women.

you know that sex, specially in clubs, is not some 18 hours tantra sting like expiriance right?

Also the thought, women could keep up, they just don't want to, because it isn't very "profitable" for them. For gay men it is different. You do go to the club to have sex or to hook up.

also when you're 17-20something you can party 6 times a week and sleep on monday, and you will be fine(unless you catch a bug).

Even, 5 dudes per year. Per lets say 6-10 years (for normies) since 16-17 up to 22-27 till settling down.

Thats a lot of dick.

Yet I know of girls who fucked in their middle-late 20s and were just timid/shy/picky.

Moral is: statistics usually show up to 5 partners for all women, on average. This gives a dose of virgin brides and turbosluts, with a majority at a lifetime score of 5. (penetration) Bell curve my dudes.

Markle looks like a fucking empty shoebox

It's in their nature. Women can't be real friends with other people. They envy prettier and richer women and want to be like them, they see similar level women as competition and they keep uglier women around them so they can feel superior

its certainly not 50, but its closer to 50 than 5

Because one of them is younger than the other

>Even, 5 dudes per year. Per lets say 6-10 years (for normies) since 16-17 up to 22-27 till settling down.

>Thats a lot of dick.

bro, I went with a conservative example of 2 dicks per night. 5 dicks per year is for gays that are 50+ and not rich. or guys who fly for one night to fuck boys in bangkok.

with numbers being 1.12 parters for married ones and around 1.9 partners for nonmarried, at the time of survey. Sample size teens up to 50yrd olds. Average initiation - 18/19.

Attached: IMG_20200310_091619.png (572x496, 272.73K)

>Average dick count for modern women is only 5
(X) Doubt

warsaw is the capital of Poland, it is not a small 10k town(but those won't have gay clubs either).
your telling me that someone living in NY or LA is not going to be able to fuck 2 different dudes per year, if they are willing. I have seen, when working in las vegas, twinks getting trained on by 20+ guys, for like a week.

If you're immediate thought wasn't threesome with both then you're gay

kek how long till you cunts guillotine your poofter president?

Or they all lie. Men and women, machos and sluts, lowering their numbers.

Occams razor bros.

Attached: IMG_20200310_091551.png (600x458, 217.04K)

with those tests you always have to look what women claim and what they think other women do. you ask about how many partners a woman has, and depending on how slutty she is. she will tell something between 10-20. you ask her about how many partners other women have and you get the anwser, A there is no limit B30+ it is a new age.

it is like all the tests made to check what is the main factor to choose a partner for hook up. in claimed data you get inteligance, banter etc from women. but when it was checked what really did influance it the most it is looks.

for men it is looks too, but men don't lie that they are looking for deep thinkers in one night stands.

Its one of those cases, like with race mixing sluts, that 5% most vocal or visible, is responisible for outgroup and ingroup image. Most of people are UNSEEN, leading their quiet unrenarkable normiq lives with their equally unremarkable normiq halfs.

maybe it counts all modern women aka including all girls between the age of 1-13,and women 50+. then the avarge could be 5. if chad fucks a 100 women and 9 wojaks fuck zero, the avarge gets skewed too.

I don't want to fuck a negress, thanks.

Attached: 1583806745602.jpg (1949x1352, 252.17K)

literally it sorta is like... otherwise. Lets say all man add 3 and all women substract 3. Lets say all women dothis, but no men. Results would be bonkers and not 1.12-1.92 but around 3 or 5. average. this is just not true.

Face it, womanlets are incels too, but by their own shitty design, masquarading as volcels.

Attached: IMG_20200310_092459.png (622x1154, 425.47K)

Yes.

Attached: 1573761232938.jpg (611x571, 56.08K)

I dont like black dudes because they smell and taste funny. But most americans are kind of a strange, blacks are just unpleasent strange. mid west guys are IMO the best.

Based