$22B a year budget

>$22B a year budget
>produces 1 fake picture a year

Attached: PIA23623_fig1.jpg (2916x859, 2.35M)

Other urls found in this thread:

jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA23623
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/transcoded/d/de/ISS_Assembly.webm/ISS_Assembly.webm.360p.vp9.webm
youtu.be/5JJL8CUfF-o
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

coronavirus

jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA23623

Never
A
Straigfht
Answer

amiright?

Mars' sky is blue.
They dye it pink to make it look more alien and less like northern Canada.

Too many religion fags who would go into a craze if they only knew

they take lots of pictures, most of them are extremely bland though. you can follow the rovers on their subreddits.

Devon Island indeed

Ok magatard, how about you hang out with the
TRUMP BOYS and get the CORONA VIRUS from drinking CORONA.
>I'm going to vote trump and get CORONA VIRUS
Retard!!!!!

They dye the entire atmosphere pink for a photo op? Pink looks more Earth-like than blue?

>ITS ALL FAKE GOY
>DONT BELIEVE IN SCIENCE GOY WE HAVE OLD BOOKS TO KEEP YOU DUMB AND UNEDUCATED
>HAVE MY JEW ON A STICK GOY

Kys leafjew

>amiright?
About what?

Because its mars. And its a very boring planet. I guess a rover on Mercury would singe but itd make for some neat footage

All space money should be spent on building orbital space colonies. Once you have space colonies everything else becomes much easier.

Attached: 89710502_195864601737097_6600970275565600768_n.png (1080x803, 1.05M)

>GOD DOESN'T EXIST - THAT'S HOW I KNOW WE WENT TO THE MOON
>LISTEN TO THE SMART MEN IN WHITE COATS - DON'T YOU KNOW WE ONLY HAVE 12 YEARS LEFT?

Attached: 62465703_2263129677097073_2924954281415016448_n.jpg (716x642, 107.12K)

Attached: 89740886_1522370941272386_3589715493990170624_n.jpg (421x280, 37.24K)

Because there is nothing to reflect the light in space. It just keeps going until it hits something.

Damn man, that shit got my noggin' joggin'!

Every photo taken of “Mars” has been of Devon Island. They have posted photos of walrus tusks and marmots hidden in the photos.

Attached: 87777991_198767764699373_2673552154609844224_n.jpg (992x1112, 173.37K)

The picture frequency definitely pisses me off, but the budget goes into getting there mostly

Attached: 87351034_597545627643448_4083498181680168960_n.jpg (864x952, 210.96K)

Attached: 87764326_663139714439227_6994634101605007360_n.jpg (964x1108, 126.38K)

Attached: 86853675_517236689186414_5579068045403357184_n.jpg (1200x1194, 118.12K)

2.5GB for one distorted picture of dirt.

Reminder: most of the world believed pic related

Attached: space tesla.png (940x627, 715.1K)

Attached: Capture+_2017-11-26-23-02-24.png (679x685, 332.6K)

>you can follow the rovers on their subreddits.
>needing to use a private forprofit website to view content from publicly funded agency

Attached: 87428969_185009656139623_2406977329982078976_n.jpg (992x348, 93.91K)

Attached: MER_ByTheNumbers_infographic_Feb2019.jpg (3600x2626, 1M)

There's hundreds of hours of footage of them assembling and maintaining parts of the station. It's just that most of it's really boring.

It's like how moon hoaxers think the entirety of the footage from the Apollo missions is the ~5 minutes of footage that gets in the highlight videos. There's like 1,000 hours of footage and 99.9% of it is astronauts putting sensors together or discussing rock samples or traversing from one site to another.

Yes you are correct. Do you want cookie?

Shit thats nothing. They need to find any water to find life. That includes frozen water on the poles. In Mars case the south pole to be exact. Where they have never even mentioned going to.

Attached: 8LZ84db9jqYb4k9u.jpg (769x921, 255.83K)

It's literally legos

why would they build it out of legos?

Why did they stray so far?

Attached: 45592D89-2A66-47FD-90DA-E6516B1F606E.jpg (1200x836, 190.43K)

>1000s of hours of film footage
yet somehow the profound radiation in cis-lunar space and on the moon's surface didn't destroy the film, not to mention the high heat of the sun shining on the unshielded cameras in a vacuum. really makes you think.

If we distribute $22B to all Americans, everybody would get 70 million dollars.

Because snap together pieces is easiest.

sure but the pieces are so small. it would take millions of them.

those sections wouldn't fit in the back of the air force's space truck

Don’t scare the normies

Attached: A6F7F254-E6D4-4AAD-8BE1-252E37DCC075.jpg (1000x1000, 176.27K)

Easier to let another service handle image hosting and sorting that people check daily and can subscribe to for updates. At least, I assume the site works something like that because it sure is fucking awful to navigate whenever I get directed there to fixes to software issues for games.

I'm not a flat earth retard by any means, but this is actually sort of interesting. I wonder what visual effect accounts for this

>The sun emits xrays

Is gravity real? No the earth is flat!
Is the moon really there? No the earth is flat?
Has anyone taken a picture of a satellite? No the earth is flat!
Every anomaly involving space = the earth is flat?
You people are retarded to a new level

the size of the bright spot changes based on how far away the light source is, far makes it appear larger, how far away you are. but the biggest reason is because the surface is textured with dust, there is always surface that will reflect light back at you. if it were smooth glass it would look like the sphere in the picture

It took like a decade to build and is still technically being added to. There's loads of photos and video from the various phases of it's construction, but obviously there is no time lapse video of it's decade long construction from a fixed point orbiting alongside it.

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/transcoded/d/de/ISS_Assembly.webm/ISS_Assembly.webm.360p.vp9.webm

Attached: ISS 4.jpg (1920x1080, 1.09M)

Yeah... what was I thinking? It’s only Von
Braun.. He’s just a dreamer...
>youtu.be/5JJL8CUfF-o

Attached: 7C1172E1-147A-434E-A319-ADDF88140188.gif (325x234, 1.77M)

Now try it with a white sphere with a black background

Attached: 1568606276999.jpg (960x947, 71.01K)

that render is a shitty example because the light source is way too close, as the surface is not nearly matte enough

ok boomer

and* fuck

Are you saying it doesn’t?

no but the sun emits rays that can penetrate more than xrays, without the atmosphere we would be radiated to death pretty quickly

>Quality post
You should give yourself a kiss

Screwing cans together and tying down solar panels, looks like a piece of slapped together fragile shit

The sun definitely emits x-rays..

>why doesnt the moon cast a shadow
hurrr i flat earther now

lots too, the atmosphere blocks those too. we can see visible light because it was the most intense and useful, with infrared coming in a close second

Attached: chrome_QVDdljEKou.png (823x723, 439.51K)

Where is the Rickenbacher?

finna give myself a handie instead

It really doesn't emit many at all outside of solar flares.
The sun primarily emits IR, visible light and UV rays. Gamma rays are produced in the core but are continuously reabsorbed and re-emitted on their way out from the core and lost most of their energy.
Of course, you're free to disregard this information as being NASA spook psyops but I seriously doubt you have any better measurements on what the sun emits. Is it damaging? For sure, but that's why they have a full body suit and dark visors. People living on the ISS have the heavily limit any time they spend gazing out the window or it will blind them.

oh neat that makes perfect sense. Thanks!

Attached: 89645565_204767937273431_8531176347014266880_n.jpg (1080x1080, 80.01K)

That image only shows atmospheric penetration, not quantity. I SURE fucking hope you're not trying to imply those bars are measuring a quantity or read it as such.

>unshielded
are you retarded?

This. This stupid Tesla stunt seems memory-holed but the whole world was oooh and ahhh about it but it was clearly fake.

Attached: 89348895_142546550367136_7424783520205111296_n.jpg (960x960, 78.71K)

it is clearly not zoomed in the same amount

Image from inside your gaping asshole
>clearly fake because of focal lens
The ISS isn't taking pictures with a close target they need in focus, the dumb car did.

Attached: moon too big.gif (402x301, 2.29M)

I love schizo threads it makes me moist

Attached: 87151254_3128013247235667_3233354859075862528_n.jpg (2047x1162, 257.18K)

>Ignore any refutation, just spam more schizo images that take longer to type out a response to than it takes me to find another 5 in my folder
I'm done with you mutts.

This. Like, it's fucking NASA. They can presumably send a camera equipped robot to another planet, but they can't stream a live feed over the world wide web? I'm in the Devon Island camp. It's a massive ruse.

australia btfo

are you trying to say that more atmospheric penetration wont result in more of that frequency being seen?
this is before the atmosphere,

Attached: chrome_kW6q1GLfNc.png (821x497, 60.15K)

>1 picture a year
The nasa databases are public domain. You can access hundreds of thousands of images. I don't care how much hard drive space you have, you probably don't have enough space to download all the curiosity rover images.

I am telling you that atmospheric penetration has zero correlation to the quantity of x-rays emitted by the sun. It could penetrate your thick fucking skull for all I care, there's very little being emitted in the first place by our sun.

Wrong. The ISS frequently has astronauts in the foreground and the earth in the background, and looks nothing like the Tesla pic. Only a change in focal length will change how far away distant objects look (wide andgle vs telephoto), not a change in focus.

i agree though, its only one part of the information you need to show how much of each frequency reaches earth

>it could penetrate your thick fucking skull for all i care
YIKES

wait, tf do you think im trying to prove?

Are there any ACTUAL flattards on this board or is it all trolls trolling trolls?