Why doesn't communism have the same evil reputation as nazism?

The terror and horror of communism is fresh and visible to all in the consciousness of the population regardless of what academia or media dictates.

red scare

Attached: commiejews.jpg (184x299, 9.78K)

Checked and /thread

Red horror

Because it's not evil on principle, and isn't inherently rooted in genocidal bigotry.

I always thought it was funny how the media and culture always talks about Nazi death counts and atrocities, but ignores the 96 million corpses communist regimes racked up over the century. The bias is pretty obvious if you ask me.

These.

Attached: 40ED62CB-8894-493A-AEAA-7077029D199D.jpg (515x422, 54.4K)

Because purges/famine is not as catchy as 6 GORILLION

Communism has worked. Nazism failed.

This, because (((Communism))) survived WWII and not Nazism (((they))) can say whatever they want.

You should watch the new superman propaganda that recently just came out. It's awesomely woke.

Attached: Communist Superman Propaganda.png (1280x720, 1M)

The populace isn't as dumb as you think it is when some academics think they can invent some paradise from the top down

Go back to USSR

Attached: Communist Superman Propaganda 2.png (1280x720, 1.03M)

Attached: Communist Superman Propaganda 3.png (1280x720, 797.11K)

>Communism has worked
>straight up lying

Attached: 1583114778262.gif (320x240, 3.27M)

1) jews
2) they killed anyone willing to utter the truth

America is freedom land with NO COMMUNIST government, anyone wanting to live to enrich someone else for free can taste socialist equality in Cuba and Venezuela and fuck off from our democracy and individual rights country.

Communism: Let's strive for an equal society where everyone's needs are met by the society at large.
Nazism: Let's oppress and wipe out everyone who doesn't fit into these restrictive rigid boxes.

There's absolutely no comparison. You need to be braindead not to understand this.

It’s not just Nazis either. They’re shitting all over Western History as well. I’ve had closet communists (which a few admitted they were communists at a later point) call Lincoln and Churchill racist genocidal monsters(with Churchill mainly over the Indian food famine), yet when I asked them about the far larger numbers communist countries have accoladed all I got was “don’t be so quick to judge, it just wasn’t done right, they believed they were doing the right thing at the time”. They love to point fingers at everyone else that isn’t them but ignore their own genocidal values, it’s funny as hell.

>new superman propaganda that recently just came out.
>recently just came out.
>not realising that superman (aka "man of steel") was always about Stalin (aka "man of steel" in Russian)

Checked and redpilled

It has. The USSR declined due to capitalism and the CIA funding the Afghani forces.

I would if it existed.

Go to Cuba, Venezuela, China, and DPRK where the state is building communism.and you're working to build a communist paradise :v

>...
Tell me the reason you don't move to socialist communist building country?

Not a fan of Cuba.

Venezuela is socialist.

China is state controlled capitalism.

DPRK is another offshoot of socialism.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>The USSR declined due to capitalism and the CIA funding the Afghani forces
stfu you are defending a useless ideology that has cost millions and millions of lives. just a week ago one of our left party speakers advocated to kill the top 1%. disgusting

Attached: laughgif26.gif (500x281, 1.63M)

USSR apologia is a whack.

Literally none of these countries are communist.

Attached: h85i4fwgwfl41.jpg (500x532, 34.06K)

Attached: socialism works so well.jpg (564x564, 62.66K)

Capitalism has costed more lives.

Inadequate healthcare coverage, imperialism with all the wars, environmental problems etc.

>Not a fan of Cuba.
You have bourgeoisie ideas and are an enemy of the state, counter revolutionary capitalist thoughts of personal gain and not the states gain

since when did communism care about the environment? and lets take a guess which group was the first to go for the protection of the environment

No one dies because people are free to trade and partake in a market economy of profit.

Yeah, no. I’m not going to pretend that western democracy is perfect, it has its flaws like any system. But it hasn’t even come close to the bloodbath that took place in communist countries. Not all conflicts since WWII, not Americans who die every year due to lack of medical coverage, and not people who are exploited in the third world by cheap labour. All of it combined doesn’t even scratch the tip of the iceberg.

Fuck, even Germany/Italy/Japan only have 1/10th the death toll. Yet those are the countries that get all the attention from the “media” and Hollywood.

United States left the Paris Accord, no one is fighting against carbon.

Insulin prices are high. People are dying from lack of treatment from X diseases.

Capitalism has killed tons of people in wars from Afghanistan to Yemen.

Capitalism has still killed way more than Communism ever has. 100 Million death toll < 400 million death toll.

How many people do you think died easily preventable deaths because they couldn't affford food, housing, or healthcare?

Because the powers that be, (((they))) want world wide communism. (((They))) don’t like politics that good against that narrative

soviets left very little evidence. Germans never saw themselves as doing anything wrong so they were sloppy. With the soviets, we know went on, hell we could prove it in one way or another but the soviets were very good at cleaning up mistakes and letting the chips fall where they may while the united states policy is to overthink and over plan only to cut and run when things go to shit.

like the jews don't control you with capitalism too. SO fuck off

>Winning side of WW2
This. You don't even realize that the last 70 years has been a fucking marathon of marxist propaganda.
Infact the first thing marxist did in germany after WWII was divide germany in half, one communist side (DDR) another normal germany. Not a border wall between two countries but between one country. Therefore tear down that wall doesn't make sense with a border wall between US and mexico. Sorry burgers. It's a kind of stupid comparison.

You've been living in low steam marxist propaganda for the last 70 years. You might have notioned the talk of erosion of nation states, and no borders and mass immigration. All of these are principles that nobody had prior to this.

They more than likely died of a heroin overdose.
If you want to survive, you can. There is nothing preventing you from gathering your own food. There are many homeless that live off the land. There are tons of homeless shelters and soup kitchens in this country if that suits your fancy. Nobody owes you a fuckin' house for simply having a pulse. Capitalism hasn't killed anyone so quit trying to come to that insane conclusion with that bs marxist pilpul.

>Capitalism has still killed way more than Communism ever has. 100 Million death toll < 400 million death toll
>source: my ass

Communism is mostly psychological warfare. The KGB's whole point was to wage war on brains. It's not as obvious as the brute force of the Nazis.

because it's the politics of weak people who are too useless and impotent to be considered as a threat (evil) usually.

Since it doesn't register as being aggressive, the human monkey brain doesn't respond in the same way to it.

Because stupid idiots love the working class.

Attached: 1458442061010.jpg (600x515, 60.08K)

good image

Exactly, the very fact that you can freely admit you’re a communist on Twitter, Youtube and Facebook shows that someone pulling the strings has an agenda. There’s no way in hell that ideology that’s costed nearly 100 million lives gets a free pass.

The general population (all of us) know it’s bullshit and social media is owned, bought and paid for by people who are pushing their bullshit.

because they ran the show up until recently.

if they let us talk about it it eventually leads to who's responsible and if they taught it in school all those young people wouldn't be so fuckin retarded, which is bad for (((them )))

>Let's oppress and wipe out everyone who doesn't fit into these restrictive rigid boxes.
Sounds exactly like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Guevara

He’s probably a fucking retarded AnCom who thinks everyone will just agree to be equal regardless of status, fame or economic power.

Turns out, not everyone is as nice as he is.

Communism’s demographic consequences are mostly accidental despite the huge intrinsic control structure implemented by communist systems. It seems like egalitarianism CANNOT incubate a Hitler. It can incubate a Stalin, but Stalins (though still a nightmare) are less strictly detrimental to their collective, and have some uses in edgecases.

What's funny is that communism never turns out that the way they think it will. AnCom itself is an oxymoron.
>everyone will be equal and nobody will have more than anyone else under our anarchal system
>how will you ensure everyone has the same wealth
>easy we will have a intrusive mass surveillance state that watches everyone to make sure they are across the board equal with no deviations
>still thinking that it's anarchal
They are often retarded so cannot say I am shocked