Hormonal Contraceptive is the root of so many of our issues. It is the core of what is causing society to shift in so many ways. It is a problem we have yet to fully wrestle with. Why is that?
Hormonal Contraceptive is the root of so many of our issues...
Other urls found in this thread:
google.com
twitter.com
I guess I should add that I truly do not understand why we feed hormones to young girls and expect nothing to shift.
They make you dumber too. Birth control literally turns them into dumb cum sluts.
stupid little shits: the picture
I do not follow. What do you mean?
Do you have any sources to back that claim up?
You think it's bad now? Wait until the MALE CONTRACEPTIVE. By then it will be sexist to ask women to take the pill. If you aren't taking the contraceptive (which has no side effects trust me!), you will not be getting any pussy -- unless you are a high status model. Then women will get superwet for your rebellious attitude.
it is really bad
This concept keeps me up at night. It will be a terrible outcome.
Based. Read Humanae Vitae. The pope at the time called this shit in the 60s
>17. Responsible men can become more deeply convinced of the truth of the doctrine laid down by the Church on this issue if they reflect on the consequences of methods and plans for artificial birth control. Let them first consider how easily this course of action could open wide the way for marital infidelity and a general lowering of moral standards. Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law. Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.
Bumping a VIT
Stealing this and will consume. Thank you for this contribution.
PRESENT BAD!
PAST GOOD!
Thanks user. Trying to spread the word.
That is not even close to the argument.
Because the healthcare retards don't care about using or researching any alternative.
You think it's bad now?
The dumbest man in this thread....
Bunch of idiots here. Did it ever occur to you that throughout history women didn’t WANT to have kids but had no other choice? Lots of women love and want kids and that’s great. To some it’s a fucking prison. When this MENSA crowd begins berating men who don’t have children the same as women, then maybe, maybe Ill take you seriously.
>what is NFP?
>extremely effective if done correctly
>zero drugs
>women can pinpoint their fertile times extremely accurately
>all you have to do is not fuck like 4 or 5 days a month (granted, it's when you are super horny, but sacrifice is unironically good for people)
>giving a shit what people WANT
People are idiots. Most of the time they just want dopamine hits
Blight’s sake, if nobody was inclined to nonconsensual sadism humans wouldn’t fucking die. Perfect world psychology would’ve pinned lifespans to escape velocity fifty years ago if not more.
I will berate men for not take my on their roles as well. Men who are cowards get berated daily.
I doubt fucking with your reproductive hormones for years on end is without consequences.
My question is why are pills worse than condoms when it comes to the attitude and change in society?
>My question is why are pills worse than condoms when it comes to the attitude and change in society
Thousands of women with off the fucking rails hormones is bad for societies built on the idea that people act a certain way. That being said, condoms are also destructive
Who benefits from the sale of hormonal contraceptives?
Contraceptives aren't the "core" of the problems in modern society, capitalism is.
It matters because female attraction is not a constant and shifts with hormones. The pill shift's females mate preference towards more feminine males, among other things. Look at the last 50 years and you will see its effects...from marriage / divorce rates, to male dropout.
Capitalism existed for decades before the family and gender broke down. Explain this.
It takes time for capital to accumulate at the top, but in general capitalism encourages individuals to seek profit at the expense of all else.
No one stops to ask whether a drug or chemical should be made widely available, they only ask if they can profit off of it.
Aside from that, hormonal contraceptives have only been available since the 1970's, we are only just beginning to understand and see the horrific societal effects of it's availability.
If you want to know why anything is the way it is, all you need to understand is who profits from the said thing.
So your solution is to eliminate the idea of "profit" from the world? Have you thought through the 2nd and 3rd order ramifications of that? Have you studied Ukraine's history or the great leap forward? I suggest you start reading.
Where in the fuck did I imply that.
I said capitalism is the root cause, not market economics.
But by all means, if you are comfortable continuing to live in a world where 1% of the population owns 99% of everything; and decisions are made solely based on the accumulation of more capital, then continue to do nothing.
whats the point of profit if it can't accumulate capital? Whats the point of capital if it can't in turn be used to make more profit? What is your argument for then?
>It takes time for capital to accumulate at the top, but in general capitalism encourages individuals to seek profit at the expense of all else.
This is true, but it doesn't necessarily follow that full blown communism is the solution to this. There is both good and evil in the profit incentive system, as well as in redistribution of wealth. Thos is why Yas Forums is a nat soc board. Ideology in economics
See You are interpreting me as a Communist when i'm really coming from a more socialist attitude.
I don't necessarily think profit and capitalism are inherently bad, but they need to be incentivized to serve the needs of the state, and by extension, the Nation.
While there are inherent benefits to centralized direction in economic activity, it also creates a lot of potential centralized corruption. There is a balance to be had no doubt, but I see the current corporate structure with our centralized power system as inherently corrupt and anti capitalist. It is more a form of corporatism. I don't see how this gets better when your system of government has more power to regulate the economy. It seems like it would only get worse.
Yas Forums isn't any one thing (other than edgy).
shut up woman
Why do you assume I am a woman?
Well, ideally, you pair that government with a system that allowed the Nation to have an actual say in their own governance. You can pair that with electorate controls like citizen service or property requirements, IQ test, whatever, in order to ensure a baseline level of quality in the people making the decisions. You can't ever totally remove corruption from a system, but there are ways to severely limit it and encourage the state to consider the needs of the nation before individual desires.
>the eternal kraut
>shills for promiscuity
>no no no not my heckin cumerinos!!!
Fucking faggot
So basically Starship Troopers?
That's one possibility. Requiring state service of some kind in order to have a vote/serve in government would definitely be a strong method of ensuring that people willing to sacrifice and serve the good of the Nation are the ones actually making the decisions.
But like I said, requiring a minimum property amount (in land, most likely) or making people take some kind of voter intelligence/ideological screening could work too.
There are effective methods of governmental control as well. Require more transparency in things like government finances, maybe force civil servants to disclose their finances, etc, are all ways of limiting government abuses.
I want to stress that I don't think you can ever completely remove corruption from society/governments, but you can take measures to limit it.
It's easy to be against the pill when you don't have sex OP.
The problem with things like land control is that it can be very oligarch prone. If you made it elective upon a sacrifice (like civil service) it could work I guess. But you definitely do not want to preclude lower status children the ability to ascend with proper sacrifices. It is essential to a well functioning system.
kek. Anything of value to add?
>leaf
>cares more about his cummies than the fate of western civilization
Salazar had people like you shot
I don't get it.
What drives Canadian liberals to Yas Forums? I've never understood this.
>I dont get it
The past was unironically better, says the CHAD Oswald Moseley
Ah. Thanks.
This is stupid, women are always like this. Read any history book from before the age of chivalry.
The real question, user, is: do you understand the degenerate effects of contraception on society?
>women have always had a headcount of 20+ on average.
(You) are an idiot if you actually believe this
Daily reminder that kikes invented the pill
google.com
Not really. Why do you think it's such an issue?
No it's not dickhead. Just get the copper IUD. No hormones there, so stfu
Doesnt matter what they want to do, they were created to serve one purpose and they've stopped doing it.
In a society without effective contraception, monogamy is far more important than in one with it. If you fuck someone on the side, there is a much higher likelihood of their getting pregnant. Wimen, knowing this, will keep their legs closed until they are sure that the man who may get them pregnant is in it for the long haul. Life long monogamous relationships are better for children and consequently, adults. The hell of promiscuity and broken homes that we live in is a direct consequence of contraception. It ends up leaving kids fatherless being raised by mothers with no impulse control
It's not just the hormones, kike, it's the entire concept
This
So the risk of pregnancy is essential?
Condoms do not mess with the balance of hormones that are essential to reproductive and cognitive function.
The Jews won when they made you believe the nuclear family is stronger than the Extended family
>your parents was already dumped in the old folks home after that it was easy to brainwash the wife & dump the children in a daycare from age 2
they have brainwashed you all into trying to emulate a family structure lie they created a family structure that will die in 2 generations
WHITE PEOPLE DESERVE THEIR EXTINCTION
because they did nothing while the JEWS cultured them like cattle
Yes.