Why are you all so heartless?

My heart is only 10x10cm.

Attached: 1518369617908.jpg (3000x1800, 1.25M)

No problemo.
Send them to Israel

because she is a nigger and her life is worth nothing. Her own men prefer men over her.

Plus, USA's oil is underneath her soil...

Attached: afghan bang bus the dancing baka boys gay islam.webm (568x320, 2.99M)

We literally are invading them right now

Well then its Russia duty to take those million "syrians" from Turkey then.

We are? Excuse me, I don't remember Greece going into Afghanistan or Pakistan in the last 2 thousand years...

Because her offspring will cut your fucking head off. Shes probs dead anyway

Why is your mother a toothless crosseyed whore with offset inverted nipples and 7" cunt cleavage?

imagine the smell

Who's more heartless, the people who stage interviews with children and use them hoping to abuse peoples' empathy in order to push their destructive political agendas, or the people who see through the bullshit and don't care?

we have our own poor to deal with, you’re a huge piece of shit. definitely deserve fire.

Attached: border1.webm (960x540, 2.83M)

Reasons

This

>tfw Greece didn't let me rape

Attached: thinking_migrant.jpg (1900x1267, 259.44K)

Because given the opportunity, these people wouldn't bat an eyelid at raping and killing us all. They know how to use empathy as a weapon and use it to their advantage.

No idea, why are (((you))) so heartless, concern trolling kikes?

No problem taking kids and cute girls. The rest can fuck off.

This
FPBP
Our hearts are full of love and compassion for our OWN PEOPLE.
This little girl needs to go back to her home country to be with her people.

And i should care why? I only care about my family and well-being and no one else's. Simple as that

and you call yourselves Christian.

PATHETIC.

Attached: 1581484461769.jpg (625x774, 82.57K)

reminds me of

Attached: mexican intellectual.jpg (640x353, 83.75K)

I wonder how keen they would be to get in if they would be settled in "refugee" camps, and repatriated if found to be lying about their situation.

saved

If the purpose of them fleeing is violence/war in Syria, why do they need to get to Europe. Can't they just then stay in Turkey? There is no war in Turkey.

whats happening on turkey greece border is beyond sickening.
you told me they were all men.
but all ove seen is lil kids with cutee mums an dads tryna break free an come work in our countries to make a better life for those innocent kids who havent got a clue as to why people are so nasty in this terrible world.

i still remember being in fear as a child so this cuts deeply.

Fuck you, you piece of human filth.

Bullshit Schlomo.

go back to whatever shithole you came from

Living around whites is not a right.

Would this be from the war in Syria or Libya that white nationalists were more vocally against than anyone else? Or from Iraq where white nationalists have wanted American troops out for over a decade?

Attached: Screenshot_2020-03-08 White supremacists defend Assad, warn Trump Don’t let Israel force y….png (673x752, 51.96K)

(((we)))

Attached: jew war.jpg (625x480, 109.32K)

Attached: refugee map.jpg (700x500, 119.79K)

I know that, you know that...

People like you should be held accountable for their actions.

Attached: tia6241902676202563152.jpg (800x917, 131.54K)

I mean this is quite a simple solution isn't it?

Leftists are using children to push their agenda, like they always had. But that doesn't mean the right must dispense with morality and nuance and take the literal opposite position.

The answer is, and always was simple. The right just needs to win and implement actually reasonable policies, with saving little girls like that from very dangerous places, and at the same time not letting a mass migration of enemy men.

This is not a dilemma.

friendly reminder that cia agent osama bin laden's children were freely vacationing in europe and eating lobsters while literal children are denied entrance

>with saving little girls like that from very dangerous places,
How about getting out of the MidEast in general, Kardashian? Leave them to sort themselves out like every other civilization in human history

my exact thought

Attached: 1576537453921.jpg (2400x1800, 680.1K)

>with saving little girls like that from very dangerous places
To what end?
Asia has 4.6 billion people, 24% of them are under 18, half of them girls. that's 555441833 girls, and a good portion of them from "very dangerous places" like India where gang rape is both a hobby and a sport.

41% of Africa's 1.3 billion people are under 18, that's 545463510 girls alone, most of them from areas where rape is rampant and some from war zones.

How the fuck are we supposed to "save little girls like that from very dangerous places", you're talking billions of people
of different races invading white nations like it's nothing. There are more little girls in need than the entire western European population and American white population combined. Tell me your simple solution.

Why is it our duty to be the world's baby sitter and foster parent for people that can't raise their own children?

Attached: Screenshot_2020-03-08 Demographics of the world - Wikipedia.png (1148x1125, 97.24K)

Attached: merlin_169823376_d05c2b42-8bb8-48a6-967d-87951c60419d-superJumbo.jpg (2048x1363, 623.96K)

***under 15

But why do they need to get into Europe if Turkey could provide safety from the war they are fleeing. Or they could go to Saudi. Doesn't the koran stipulate that muslims must help muslims?

No one cares about roasties

Holy fuck, no.

Attached: C03C0AAF-3413-43EE-9DB1-5028FFE04177.jpg (1005x628, 146.29K)

Okay so how far are you willing to go with that logic.
Let's assume we find a new island tomorrow that has a civilization and we find out that they have a religious custom of mass sacrifice, a sacrifice of 4 year old kids nonetheless. Should we not intervene?
Doesn't the moral compass of a righteous individual compel him to intervene in that situation?
I believe it does.
At the end of the day, above all, race, sex, civilization or culture stands god. And at the end of the day it's all about the righteous defeating evil.
I'm not a believer of isolationism. It is not something that can ever last.

maybe her father shouldn't have been a puppet for the global zionist agenda that is pushing jihadism? just saying

Attached: 1505653289992.jpg (382x395, 39.76K)

Good question since Hadabah is in Saudi Arabia.

>a sacrifice of 4 year old kids nonetheless. Should we not intervene?
I dunno, we are willing to leave the Sentinelese people alone as it is, and last time we intervened in the affairs of violent bloodthirsty civilizations we got wahabbis and the taliban.
We should help them advance naturally through globalization, technological and sociopolitical advance, and most importantly integration in the international community. Greeks used to have human sacrifice in the ancient times too, but just like the Romans they grew out of it
Are you also for intervention in North Korea? We saw what did it for Libya and Syria, and I don't think we need to mess up the rest of the fucking planet too

To a reasonable end, naturally. You cannot save everybody, but you can save some. Again, there is no reason to think in absolutes in this situation.
There's a problem, and that problem is going to need solving, someone has to do it, or we all will pay in the end.
We all share a planet here, even if you ignore the moral aspect of it, we can't let some regions to lack behind too much. They will become a weakness for us all in the future.
The answer might be colonization, the answer might be war. It most definitely cannot be ignorance. That is unwise and shortsighted.

FUCKING KEK!

>mass sacrifice, a sacrifice of 4 year old kids nonetheless
That effectively already happens though not religiously in China and India with their killing of female infants. Is it our duty to invade India and China and what? Force to them raise their own children? How many casualties would that war cost? Or what? We act as foster parents for their discarded children. What exactly are you asking here? What's this "simple answer"

>but you can save some.
There are 1,010,037,247 girls under 15 in the world, let's say half of them are in shitholes in Asia, South America and Africa. How many do we save and how do we do it?

>we can't let some regions to lack behind too much
>we
No, you don't mean we, you mean us, whites, Europeans. Armenia has a population of 3 million, even if you say we, it's not your people that have to deal with the charity you're proposing. It's not your people that'd fight the wars you want. You want to welcome strangers into other people's homes and pat yourself on the back for your virtue. It's easy to be charitable with other people's homes. It's easy to be brave when your sending other people to die.
>We all share a planet here
>They will become a weakness for us all in the future.
>It most definitely cannot be ignorance
>That is unwise and shortsighted.
You talk in meaningless, empty platitudes. The wars you propose would kill five times the amount of civilians than the little girls you want to save. Half the world already "lacks behind too much", half the world already is a weakness and burden on us. We tried colonisation, we were told we were bad and now need to die because of it

I hate to be the one to break it to you, this suffering has gone on since the dawn of time. It's not going to stop any time soon, we can't save the world, but we can make sure our own people aren't those that are suffering. Opening your nations doors to the world isn't sustainable. You're a fantasist.

Why don't They have Souls?

Attached: 12YO-Beheading2.webm (480x480, 2.58M)

I'm not, open borders for those kids and women, shut it for the 99% moroccan and afghani 50iq monkeys that come.
What europe has been doing up till now, is closing it's borders for the actual refugees (coptic christians, yazidis, etc..) and importing every muslim too coward to do their jihad shit.

>Are you also for intervention in North Korea?
NK is not a disaster. I'm not speaking about totalitarian regimes here, that we must intervene and spread democracy, because i'm not a believer in democracy in the first place. There's a balance between freedom and order that must be kept.

Ignoring a whole region that is lacking behind in everything and quite badly is different. And there's a reason they are so stubborn, they see the excess of liberalism in the west, and don't want the same thing happened to them. Which is why i said that first of all the right must win within the west, but after that the answer isn't just to get out of everything, and leave everything to others. It is important to do what we can to a reasonable extent to help the others. And it is important for us all.
If we lose our moral character, then this whole struggle to save the west is for naught.

Most of them are adult males from the prison system.

>Why are you all so heartless?
Cheemsburger.

youtube.com/watch?v=WD_1DFBqUbI

Attached: Cheems.jpg (225x225, 4.66K)

>If we lose our moral character, then this whole struggle to save the west is for naught.
You're not talking about our moral character, you're saying if we don't babysit the entire planet then there's no point in saving the west.

It's an asinine and insulting statement.

Maybe we shouldn't be fucking with their countries in the first place. Leave those shitholes alone.

Who says we would ignore them if we won't outright invade them? They would still do business with us, people would still move between the countries through legal channels and technology and progress would still spread. There is absolutely no reason to continue our vain resistance to the currents in these countries, we can build a million monuments but they will not see the point, teach them so many things that they don't really believe in and eventually after we roll out they will be back in the mud like after every intervention.
Our moral character applies to our people, not our enemies in the East, let's help our little girls and homeless first and then we can talk about the rest