Now that the science is settled, why are Democrats the party of dumb people?
Other urls found in this thread:
Pander to minorities and get to be a mental minority.
Trump supporters are uneducated shitbagz who unironically vote against their own economic CLASS interests
nigger IQ is 70 in africa, a trained monkey can reach 80
Median Trump voter salary is higher than that of Democrats, you stinking poofter.
Firstly there is less than 5% difference between the two which makes it almost insignificant and secondly it is also only a measure of "verbal intelligence" instead of the logical one (that is usually what IQ represents).
I'm a particle physicist and I got my first job as a mechanical engineer at 19. You vote to take my taxes.
End of discussion.
Are you sure it's Trump voters voting against their own economic class interests?
>haha look at that, GOP is almost three times as smarterer than democrats!
Nice larp incel
>verbal "intelligence"
>adults incapable of speaking their own language properly
Medically classified they to be called imbeciles or morons. Out of sensitivity we changed that to mentally retarded. Then mentally handicapped. Now there is no term. They are just people, and they breed... and vote.
>he doesnt understand margins
Thanks for proving this scientific study in real time
What the fuck do you even mean? Speaking correctly does not make you an idiot and even if it would 5% is close to no difference at all...
Speaking directly correlates to intelligence. Language is literally the first thing you learn. You begin studying speech before you learn not to shit your diaper. Language is the basis of humanity. Without verbal communication we are monkeys. It is the function of all cooperation and invention. You begin learning this and continue to learn it your entire life until death. If by adulthood, you do not have a firm grasp on your own native language, you are quite literally medically mentally fucking retarded.
take that on your way out, nigger
>projection: the post
>deflection: the mutt
lol. I love the way some of these statistics are presented sometimes. The presentation itself actually makes you question if the statistic is even legit.
You're only comparing 'verbal iq' because you can. God knows if you could you'd post the graph of logical iq. But you can't.
I know right? Mutts are notorious with disingenuous use of statistics and fidgeting with scales when reporting something, where when something increases from 1% to 2% they report it as SHOCKING 100% INCREASE IN X OVER LAST YEAR which is mathematically correct, but so fucking disingenuous. And it just works because mutts are fucking retards and they don't make them any other way.
Leftist supporters are uneducated shitbagz who unironically vote against their own ethnic and RACE interests
When people do studies on Dems vs. Republicans, they never take into account how niggers will skew the statistics against the Democrats.
It's funny because the average white Democrat is probably slightly higher IQ than a white Republican and they probably realize it's the niggers causing the bad data but they are not allowed to point it out.
Unironically, leftists are smarter than right wing voters in the ideological sense, right wing are more about the reals. Leftists in the west got swayed into the identity politics which resulted in a bunch of infighting meanwhile right wings don't even want to acknowledge the fact that class war is real and present and are happy and content with their chumps change while others are making billions that's direct result of exploitation.
Unironically, all voters are retarded. False dichotomy.
mutts are notorious for not understanding/picking up on sarcasm. it must be all the autism in their tap water.
Every woman that is not a whore acts against their economic interest for good reason.
The Democrats are a party of whores upset they can't bribe non-whores.
>Unironically, all voters are retarded. False dichotomy.
Completely agree, everyone got fucking duped. I would get that point if it sparked the discussion, but more often than not it never does. However, third way is a meme Nat Soc and Fascisim is same exploitative capitalist system with no muh democracy soft skills.
Communism is the way to the stars for humanity as a whole, but in the future, it will require huge sacrifices everywhere. Pol's current take on the problems are correct, but their solutions are lacking.
No.
This is from Noah Carl's study published in the journal Intelligence. Here is the link to the full study: gwern.net
2800 goy slaves each without a belief in god, thats all it is, nothing more.
Well democrats off the bat have 13% of the population to figure in.
You are wrong, my man. If humanity wants to survive, it will have to adapt altruistic, collectivistic and communist society. Just because it failed before, doesn't mean it's wrong. When feudalism and serfdom was slowly getting replaced by liberty, democracy and market economy, it took more than one attempt i.e French Revolutions, yet here we are.
Ive been here since before Yas Forums existed, I could fill the thread with this stuff.
The sad truth of it is that most people know we’re living in some corrupt shithole but hyperindividualization from the consoomer culture disease keeps us from ever seeing eye to eye on these fundamental issues.
>Implying niggers vote
moron
We are not all just human and communism is a Jewish slave scheme. National Socialist Germany was a complete success, communism is white genocide. Nothing is equal in nature, equality is a social construct.
Did you read a disclaimer at the bottom of the article:
> Oh yeah, and everything in that bullsh*t you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot.
Way to demonstrate how retarded you are OP.
Why Are We Nationalists?
We are nationalists because we see the nation as the only way to bring all the forces of the nation together to preserve and improve our existence and the conditions under which we live.
The nation is the organic union of a people to protect its life. To be national is to affirm this union in word and deed. To be national has nothing to do with a form of government or a symbol. It is an affirmation of things, not forms. Forms can change, their content remains. If form and content agree, then the nationalist affirms both. If they conflict, the nationalist fights for the content and against the form. One may not put the symbol above the content. If that happens, the battle is on the wrong field and one’s strength is lost in formalism. The real aim of nationalism, the nation, is lost.
That is how things are today in Germany. Nationalism has turned into bourgeois patriotism and its defenders are battling windmills. One says Germany and means the monarchy. Another proclaims freedom and means Black-White-Red [the colors of the German flag]. Would our situation today be any different if we replaced the republic with a monarchy and flew the black-white-red flag? The colony would have different wallpaper, but its nature, its content, would stay the same. Indeed, things would be even worse, for a facade that conceals the facts dissipates the forces today fighting against slavery.
Bourgeois patriotism is the privilege of a class. It is the real reason for its decline. When 30 million are for something and 30 million are against it, things balance out and nothing happens. That is how things are with us. We are the world’s Pariah not because we do not have the courage to resist, but rather because out entire national energy is wasted in eternal and unproductive squabbling between the right and the left. Our way only goes downward, and today one can already predict when we will fall into the abyss.
>Yes, your cited and documented evidence,
>But consider my angry biased narratives based on literally nothing
Nationalism is more wide-reaching than internationalism. It sees things as they are. Only he who respects himself can respect others. If as a German nationalist I affirm Germany, how can I hold it against a French nationalist who affirms France? Only when these affirmations conflict in vital ways will there be a power-political struggle. Internationalism cannot undo this reality. Its attempts at proof fail completely. And even when the facts seem to have some validity, nature, blood, the will to life, and the struggle for existence on this hard earth prove the falsity of fine theories.
The sin of bourgeois patriotism was to confound a certain economic form with the national. It connected two things that are entirely different. Forms of the economy, however firm they may seem, are changeable. The national is eternal. If I mix the eternal and the temporal, the eternal will necessarily collapse when the temporal collapses. This was the real cause for the collapse of liberal society. It was rooted not in the eternal, but in the temporal, and when the temporal declined it took the eternal down with it. Today it is only an excuse for a system that brings growing economic misery. That is the only reason why international Jewry organizes the battle of the proletarian forces against both powers, the economy and the nation, and defeat them.
From this understanding, the young nationalism draws its absolute demand. The faith in the nation is a matter for everyone, never a group, a class or an economic clique. The eternal must be distinguished from the temporal. Maintaining a rotten economic system has nothing to do with nationalism, which is an affirmation of the Fatherland. I can love Germany and hate capitalism. Not only can I, I must. Only the annihilation of a system of exploitation carries with it the core of the rebirth of our people.
Nice fan fiction there, and as expected finished with Solzhenitsyn. Half of the stuff written there is just straw manning, didn't bother to read the rest. Some people cannot be helped and will defend their way of life to the bitter end even though they are the one suffering the most.
No shit. I am a member of Intertel, a society for the top 1% regarding IQ. Yeah, yeah, I know IQ is a meme. Still, literally everyone there is a hardcore Republican.
This. Same with reading comprehension. I cannot count the number of times in college that we had blacks read something and somehow a third grader would have been better at it. They are literally taught to read for free and they still suck at it.
Proof or it didn't happen
>Your directly cited evidence is bullshit, I know because it contradicts my feelings
It's a bit like those numbers showing that the US is shrinking in height, and IQ, placed next to the increase in immigration from brown lands.
>Just because it failed before, doesn't mean it's wrong
If every attempt to actualise the idea into practice has failed spectacularly, it's not the attempts that are lacking. It's the idea itself.
We are nationalists because as Germans, we love Germany. Because we love Germany, we want to preserve it and fight against those who would destroy it. If a Communist shouts “Down with nationalism!”, he means the hypocritical bourgeois patriotism that sees the economy only as a system of slavery. If we make clear to the man of the left that nationalism and capitalism, that is the affirmation of the Fatherland and the misuse of its resources, have nothing to do with each other, indeed that they go together like fire and water, then even as a socialist he will come to affirm the nation, which he will want to conquer.
That is our real task as National Socialists. We were the first to recognize the connections, and the first to begin the struggle. Because we are socialists we have felt the deepest blessings of the nation, and because we are nationalists we want to promote socialist justice in a new Germany.
A young fatherland will rise when the socialist front is firm.
Socialism will become reality when the Fatherland is free.
------
Why Are We Socialists?
We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state.
Socialism is the doctrine of liberation for the working class. It promotes the rise of the fourth class and its incorporation in the political organism of our Fatherland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and regaining German freedom. Socialism, therefore, is not merely a matter of the oppressed class, but a matter for everyone, for freeing the German people from slavery is the goal of contemporary policy. Socialism gains its true form only through a total fighting brotherhood with the forward-striving energies of a newly awakened nationalism.
That definitely applies more to liberals.
>settled science
There's no such thing. Science always advances.
Without nationalism it is nothing, a phantom, a mere theory, a castle in the sky, a book. With it it is everything, the future, freedom, the fatherland!
The sin of liberal thinking was to overlook socialism’s nation-building strengths, thereby allowing its energies to go in anti-national directions. The sin of Marxism was to degrade socialism into a question of wages and the stomach, putting it in conflict with the state and its national existence. An understanding of both these facts leads us to a new sense of socialism, which sees its nature as nationalistic, state-building, liberating and constructive.
The bourgeois is about to leave the historical stage. In its place will come the class of productive workers, the working class, that has been up until today oppressed. It is beginning to fulfill its political mission. It is involved in a hard and bitter struggle for political power as it seeks to become part of the national organism. The battle began in the economic realm; it will finish in the political. It is not merely a matter of wages, not only a matter of the number of hours worked in a day — though we may never forget that these are an essential, perhaps even the most significant part of the socialist platform — but it is much more a matter of incorporating a powerful and responsible class in the state, perhaps even to make it the dominant force in the future politics of the fatherland. The bourgeoisie does not want to recognize the strength of the working class. Marxism has forced it into a straitjacket that will ruin it. While the working class gradually disintegrates in the Marxist front, bleeding itself dry, the bourgeoisie and Marxism have agreed on the general lines of capitalism, and see their task now to protect and defend it in various ways, often concealed.
I'm conservative and my IQ was tested at 168. But on the otherhand most of IQ tests have to do with pattern recognition.
>Facts? No thanks I've got ideology!
>Pattern recognition
>Unironic intersectional socialists are worse at it
Who'da thunk it
>SHTF circa 2035
>self-formed militias will go on a rampage killing anyone even remotely tied or associated with the establishment, gov or big business
>100 years later people on Yas Forums call these people treacherous and greedy farm retards because those currently governing dindu'
nothin' and had best interest of the population in mind
>inb4 it's not the same thing
It is.
Need moar
The left is too stupid to realise that socialism was all about nation building at the cost of everyone else by creating a entirely closed and heavily regulated society. You literally can't be a proper functioning socialist society if you have an open society. The left wants both and it is the reason they always fail at it.
>It sees things as they are. Only he who respects himself can respect others. If as a German nationalist I affirm Germany, how can I hold it against a French nationalist who affirms France? Only when these affirmations conflict in vital ways will there be a power-political struggle. Internationalism cannot undo this reality. Its attempts at proof fail completely. And even when the facts seem to have some validity, nature, blood, the will to life, and the struggle for existence on this hard earth prove the falsity of fine theories.
This is why Goebbels is low IQ shitposter who judges everything from his point of view, in his current frame of his current timeline. Meanwhile I am talking here about 200-400 hundred years ahead. What's the point of nationalism in Germany or France, when none of it will eventually exist? Hell, the fact that we all are speaking English is a 1st step, except all this globalization got co-opted by the new money that isn't sold on the old world ideas.
this was 2014
in 1960, white IQ was 70 in modern terms
see Flynn effect
You're a WoW RPer. Shut the fuck up. And unemployed trust fund masturbators pay more taxes than your hypothetical mechnical engineer.
How could a party that's entire agenda is built for and by low IQ low skill migrant workers be a part for smart people?