How come that the biggest nation to ever exist was neither white nor monocultural?
How come that the biggest nation to ever exist was neither white nor monocultural?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Because savages know nothing but killing.
>a temporary conquest that almost instantly fragmented
>nation
Wasn't really an empire, more of an extended genocide campaign.
Because Mongols are chads and still are to this day. Only country I'd ever consider moving to.
Read about the Mongol royal family Y-DNA.
the largest nation or empire in history was the british empire. Ofcourse brits are not white either. Then the mongols. Not white. Then the russian empire. Not white. Then the spanish empire. Not white. Then the Chinese at some point, again not white.
you dont move to mongolia
mongolia moves to you
They had very little control over the lands they "conquered" hence they only lasting a generation. Also the british empire was much bigger.
>biggest nation to ever exist was neither white nor monocultural?
Because in order to be big, you need other peoples' territory, and most people aren't genocidal kikes so they'd rather subdue than murder.
Even better tbqh
Learn history nigger.
Ah yes, the mighty swedish empire. The white people's pride. Conqueror of the finnish tribes and some tiny prince electors.
That italy is thicc
What about that?
Because almost all of that "empire" was uninhabited steppes. Have you watched the Grand Tour (top gear) episode where they are in mongolia? Its fucking empty.
>Turko-mongolians were themselves "multi-cultural" ranging from white to chinese
>they staffed their bureaucracy with jews and christians,
>the leadership had diverse religion
>if you remove china and eran/middle east, its all open steppe
>armies comprised entirely of horse riders was relatively rare, and provided decisive advantage.
>china was a case of simply replacing the top, while maitaining the political structures.
>they came at a time of decay and decline in both the middle east and china, so faced little real opposition.
>they never formed a nation, they just replaced the ruling elites in the areas they captured remaining separate from the societies they took over
>land trade was allways more important than sea trade, and they controled the most important and wealthy routes.
>they quickly disintegrated with the deaths of each successive generation of rulers.
Cause they conquered a bunch of weak tribes around them with a huge savage army. It’s not like they conquered Europe or even took America before plaques wiped the natives. Having lots of countries in a small place shows true power since they can’t conquer each other hence why Europe has so many small countries, but formed the EU once their power weakened
You could hardly call it a nation. Even at the height of the Mongol conquests, most of the “empire” was still autonomous republics such as those of the Turks and the Persians.
Just ask Finland
there was plenty their it just wasnt made of permanent settlements.
the monguls had the largest premodern wheeled vehicles.
The british empire didn't exist, it was a jewish empire, legal terms mean jews reaped the profits brits got the blame, fuckin dimwits. And still don't know to this day.
it was multicultural so it existed for 60 years since it started expanding from literall tribes and expanded because was tolerant towards different religions and ethnicities as long as they accepted their authority and paid tribute/joined their military
two edged sword
That's the same nation as the German Empire with Hitler was. Just that it lasted far longer :^)
And all of Russia through the river systems.
>Large empire was multicultural
Etnically Homogeneous countries are relatively small because this world has hundreds of etnicities
>Was non-white
Whites, globally speaking, are a minority. There is therefore a huge chance that taking a random big area in the world that will be mostly non-white
/Thread
there appears to be an error in your map, I don't see the ancient independent state of BALESTINE
>kikepost
>largest empire
>mongols
I didn't even mention sweden because it's not relevant, you brazil cuck, go back to fucking mutt trannies
the british empire never extended inland past the distance a ship's cannon could fire.
Because of the fuckin Himalayan mountains.
An exaggeration but yes the empires strengthen rested in its navy although the army while small was extremely competent and the administration was also excellent for such a wide spread empire
>Conquering Eastern Europe, Siberian tribes, China and disorganized Middle Eastern countries while being unchallenged and then collpasing immediately after is somehow more of an accomplishment than conquering the entired Mediterranean and most of Europe while being constantly at war with some of the most powerful armies in history
More rightly termed the East India Empire, run out of the City of London which of course is a city state, a separate country
London has 32 boroughs and the City of London is the 33rd
True, I forgot that tme when they, although literally living in the artic circle, all died out in the russian winter lmao
oh boy....
seeThe Sun still hasn't set, and we were still the biggest empire to date
A crew of dude-bros like this backing you up.
en.wikipedia.org
And have a meritocracy when everyone else promotes their cousin the goat fucker.
>What is India, Australia and Canada
retard
canada is 90%+ empty land
Australia is 90%+ emptly land
both far more so a hundred years ago than today.
India was ruled via proxies from the main ports
the retard is you.
Because
Wasn't Gengis Khan described as having red hair and green eyes?
Yes.
Mongols were based as fuck
youtube.com
Pic related, what Genghis said to the mudslimes of Khwarezm when they said God would punish him for his crimes after he massacred their cities
Cenked
wtf I love mongols now
because it was a empire of shitskins, whites are 10:1 outnumbered in this world by shitskins, and shitskins are easily ruled. observe that the most glorious shitskin empire to ever exist got militarily btfo and collapsed within a generation of attacking europeans.
it wasn't a nation, but an empire that rose and fell rapidly, also depends on how you count "largest ever" by some estimates it was the british who had that "largest ever"
Fpbp
and the reason they had them, when europe mostly abandoned chariots? The terrain was flat enough that they were functional.
this, people don't really realize how small a population group can be and still be a distinct culture. We are talking a group of 100k people is more than enough to completely sustain itself and a culture.
It's true. Genghis Khan had the most successful Y chromosome ever.
why doesn't the biggest nation to ever exist still exist???
Ah yes the swedish empire, a bunch of somali niggers. Not white.
Epic, simply epic. Who is when then, mohamed?
The Roman empire was also multi-cultural
because cavalry is badass. being badass makes up for a lot of stuff.
but they were also very persistent, creative, ruthless and pragmatic.
>Because savages know nothing but killing.
COPE. whites will go extinct as weak white males cry about their empathy. Pathetic.
because their based leader was a shaman who could talk to spirits, I wonder what their symbol was?
So he was whiter than OP
>can't get basic shit right
>mongols
>multicultured
They were monocultured, places with different cultures were assimilated or exterminated.
also this
WAT IS AN EMPIRE!?====??
>places with different cultures were assimilated or exterminated.
Not true, read a book
>not white
>not white
>not white
When Lord, whens gone be my time!?!?
Because it purely was conquest, it feel apart quite quickly because the conquest stopped and running a multi-cultural empire doesn't work out long term (yes, even for the mongols who seems to be the exception for everything)
It fell apart pretty quickly iirc