Does shall not be infringed imply personal nukes?

There is no line you kike faggot.

>whatever it takes to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government

no military weapons for unhinged, hypernationalistic inbreds like yourself

enjoy handguns and low impact airsoft rifles

And where do you draw the line, things limited to the individual soldiers, like guns, grenades, nvg, or do you mean Gates could have a battleship parked in the Puget Sound with vials of chemical agents at the ready?

Good luck stopping shoot and scoot with a predator you absolute idiot

2A faggots literally get gaped by draconian laws but as long as they can post boomer shit on facebook and have guns they're placated like a toddler with a pacifier.

Mutts are pathetic

>a fucking leaf

An arm is a weapon that an individual can ready and operate. A weapon of war is one that literally takes an army to maintain. And operate.

you mean a real life fat man?

There’s already a line, retarded faggot, look at the current restrictions on firearms

I draw the line at large bombs.

Both of your rifles are absolute poverty trash.

>Does shall not be infringed imply personal nukes?
Yes. The only laws barring their creation have to do with with moving the related materials across state lines. All current fissile material production is conducted by private industry that complies with licensing and regulatory constraints. The US government hasn't produced any itself since the 80s.
>Where would you draw the line
I wouldn't. And neither did the authors of the document.

How much do grenades cost?

>he hits the enter key twice

What your typical infantryman would carry, including full auto.
See vid related.

youtube.com/watch?v=BJTaa0vCtUE

The question was where would (((you))) draw the line. Fuck off.

>shoots
>scoots
>hellfire missile to the face
nope looks like you thought this all the way through user

Personal weaponary. In the case of a single soldier. For a militia any and all military hardware, so long as they have the resources to secure and maintain them.

There’s literally nothing wrong with either of those guns.

You're an idiot.

Yes, weapons restrictions are unconstitutional.

Where does the government draw the line? Why do you garbage like your government deserves access to these things, but you don't? Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer get to play with chemical weapons, but not you? YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED. ONLY PARASITE TRASH AND JEWS, GOYIM. GO MAKE TAX MONEY YOU FUCKING COW, BACK TO WORK

You can buy night vision and thermal now without restriction and the higher end stuff is the same stuff the military uses, just expensive.

small nuclear warheads like the W54 should unironically be legal for personal use and open or conceal carry.

they could be extremely useful in rural home defense scenarios.. like a group of several hundred trespassing on your property or something..
or if a neighboring homestead declares war.

anything more than a few kilotons is overkill.

Anything the military can use should be able to be bought by private citizens if they can afford it.

>Does shall not be infringed imply personal nukes?

Sure, why not?

And if you think that's goofy, what's stopping anyone from building a personal nuke NOW??

Whatever is takes to protect myself.

I think self protection is too ambiguous a term to not define. Self protection means that if someone has the audacity to attack me for any unprovoked reason, be it a home invasion, mugging or just picking a fight because they're irritated, I want the right to be able to end that worthless piece of shit's life with as little effort as the push of a button, because those who attack others unprovoked don't deserve the energy that it would take to kill them by hand. Anyone who commits a crime against another person deserves death. Where I get even better is that I believe most things the government does are crimes against me. I believe that financial institutions commit crimes against everyone. Other drivers commit the crime of being in front of me. Basically, in self defense, I would kill everyone on earth but me and hot young girls without driver's licenses.

I would self defense the fuck out of the captcha programmers first. Fuck captcha. Fuck google. Fuck Yas Forums for implementing it.
>inb4 register for Yas Forums pass
even though I'm not foolish enough to believe that what we write here is actually anonymous, I'm not registering for voluntary monitoring, either.

No nukes. No ICBM's. Everything else is good to go.

To elaborate if you have the men to operate an Abrahms Tank there should be no reason why you cant. You should however be able to afford the $2.5million dollar hardware, have the skills and manpower to operate it safely, and a secure place to store it. Very few people meet this criteria.

>Where would you draw the line, full auto, semi auto, grenades?
Fully automatic grenade launcher open carry (on trucks)

Ah the old semi auto rifles are just like nukes strawman. It's like 1994 all over again.

Attached: grandfather_of_assault_weapons.jpg (1809x1199, 346.82K)

>based aussies typing based things
>t. based

No line at all

Citizens should be armed with rocket propelled grenade launchers, flamethrowers, hand grenades, and given complete and total authorization to purge heretics and enemies of the Imperium wherever they are found.

Attached: external-content.duckduckgo.com.jpg (1920x2699, 407.74K)

>hits nothing
>fires again
>hits nothing
>bullet to the face

Uranium procurement, but then you'd be tempted to make an underground reactor instead, because useful.

the founders did not exclude grenades so definitely somewhere past that

Attached: 2nd amend.jpg (650x880, 521.43K)

If America was the actual nation it was intended to be, no one would have a problem with their neighbor owning nukes or whatever they wanted because they know that those things were meant to be used our collective enemies and not against each other.

If the government decides to bomb the shit out of your house, you won't be able to do shit with your tiny toy guns

It’s not a straw man, I am genuinely asking and there are obvious tiers of damage, usefulness to weaponry, examples being knife

based and halopilled

Attached: rape.png (350x319, 102.29K)

It's not like the government builds weapons you know, private companies build a sell them so in effect, all big weapon systems are privately owned until sold.

Attached: 1576209541554.png (900x850, 590.98K)

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Seeing as the point of the 2nd Amendment was to have a well armed militia, a citizen in good standing (not a felon, free from psychiatric problems, not mentally retarded) should be allowed to possess what a soldier possesses, full auto assault rifle, light machine gun, pistol, grenades etc.

Attached: 1465667578040-1.jpg (819x783, 136.38K)

There is no line.
Theoretically you should be able to own nuclear, chemical, and even biological weapons.
However, people have gotten together and decided that these weapons of mass destruction are too dangerous for anyone to use.

There is a difference between restricting a type of weaponry from civilians and restricting a type of weaponry from everyone by voluntary consent.
So anything the government has is well within my rights to own. When the governments of the world give up their nuclear arsenals, then we can have a serious talk about prohibiting recreational mcnukes.

nukes aren't real faggot

The only line to draw is a thin, red line in the sand.

Attached: BeltFedBoogaloo1566619150178.png (441x748, 390.45K)

AND MY AXE!

Attached: 1582046670979.jpg (640x845, 78.67K)

I don't draw the line, I draw my weapon

Damn that worked so well for us in the middle east

Hence I should be allowed to keep a 40mm autocannon and a THAAD battery on my lawn

Yes it does. The built in ambiguity of the Constitution of the United States is one of it's most endearing qualities. Define arms.

>Super sikkkk sniper rifle vepr hitting 5 moa on a good day with ugly ass synthetic handguard and abortion tier synthetic buttstock with lmao cheek riser
>Poverty tier 20 inch rifle with garbage A2 stock, garbage carry handle, retarded folding foregrip, shitty plastic clamshell drop in handguard, and a fucking pistol light mounted on the A2 post

Yeah there is a lot wrong with them, and you if you think they're anything but gun show poverty specials.

I have to have a loicense to keep an attack falcon. That’s some bullshit

84-gun man-o-war. Anything more than that is excessive.

You can mine and refine uranium by yourself. You don't get bomb making uranium that way, or even good reactor material, but you can construct small reactors with it. People have made them in their garages.

>these weapons of mass destruction are too dangerous for anyone to use.
Governments, too.

That’s not a vepr. No guns fag

let's see...
general dynamics, raytheon, northrop, leidos, all get filthy fucking rich and a couple of tranny infantry faggots lose their legs
hum let us do the math
hum

humm

Yes, precisely.

that's exactly why you should be able to buy stingers in Wallmart.