How do I argue this?
How do I argue this?
There's a difference between immigrants and conquerors.
I want to get rid of non-whites, not immigrants
Tap into your colonial roots and just beat the shit out of them. No time for questions.
Indian giver! Or seller, I guess.
We conquered them.
If you're born here then you're native, by definition of the word. Native and legal aren't necessarily mutually inclusive but they generally come together.
You can't, really. All you can do is be a sociopath and admit "haha yeah but we're stronger than you so no thanks we aint goin nowhere :^)" which essentially outs you as an immoral faggot, but it's easier to do that than actually make amends.
this reminds me why its important to fight. otherwise china will keep our stragglers in a zoo
Some blankets infected with smallpox worked pretty good last time
Solutreans (ancient Europeans) were on the continent first.
>Drum Banging intensifies
HAYAYAYA HAYAYAYA HAYAYAYA AYAYAYA AYAYAYA HOOO
Might makes right.
If the white race does die out it just proves that they were inferior, but that doesn't mean they have to sit there and take it.
I've been saying for years that white leftists should go back to Europe. What could they possibly say to argue against that?
ask them what country george washington immigrated to
Conquest and people being allowed in to collect gibs is different
The fact that a native american even lives today is a sign of the loving nature of the colonial conquerors. They could have just genocided all of them, but didn't. Just a neat thing to think about.
Solutreans were here first, Asia is waiting for his return
So when are we getting Europe back?
America, that is, the United States is a state and government formed by whites in an area of the continent of North America. A people cannot leave a country/state when they leave a land; if they do so, that country/state ceases to exist; ergo, we are not immigrants to our own country/state.
unchecked immigration destroyed the indians. maybe it's smart to avoid making the same mistake.
They fought back against their conquerors and I want to do the same for my people. The "owner" of any land is the one who is willing to fight hardest for it, there is no "objective good guy" in any of these scenarios.
Furthermore, we did not "immigrate" to some hypothetical Native American nation, we conquered this land and built our own from the ground up, to call us "immigrants" is retarded.
I'm not even allowed to leave the country. Clear that up and fucking deport me.
To be honest. The killings of the Indians were the biggest fuck up in history. Let's all remember this next time we shake hands with an Anglo.
Original Natives were White. Show them pic related
Depending on the audience you can say "well look what fucking happened to them" or explain that the country and advanced, wealthy society that lives in it didn't exist at that time and it's not comparable. You also may be able to touch on "so you're saying we should start scalping immigrants" if you have a lot of confidence and sufficient tact
Isn't there a smuggie for this?
"The United States was founded by a bunch of guys getting on a boat, murdering everyone and stealing their land, and you still think immigration is a GOOD thing?!"
We didn't immigrate, we conquered
If you really want to fuck with them ask if they'd be willing to cut all funding going to immigration and migration support and put it into helping the first Nations population grow
They don't care about first Nations people, they stand on their graves
This, fuck leftist rhetoric
Who do beaners try to claim the southwest when Native Americans also claim it?
>owning land
breeding with them produced demonstrably poorer results
Fpbp
Nicely shopped Paco I now understand why the Jews have allied you.
>fighting for your tribe makes you a sociopath, unlike the native americans who fought for viciously for theirs, they are true heroes!
kek
You didn't do shit Shaim.
>Ok, so, when are you going?
When you make me.
Not only that, but Europe itself belongs to us Middle Easterners. The ones that brought civilization to Europe were Middle Easterners (ENF and their European mixed descendants EEF). Digusting savage whitoids came from Central Asia. Cumskins are just hypocritical evil vile creatures that deserve eradication.
He has the truth. USA racist people are completely hypocrite.
I would move back to Europe with all other white Americans/Canadians/Australians/South Africans in a heartbeat if it meant all nonwhites were expelled from Europe
Ok see he has to go back to Russia?
Indians are also invaders and they genocided the people they invaded.
/thread
You can't immigrate to a place that isn't a country.
Maybe we should all go back to Africa, you know, because of the out of Africa theory and sheeit.
This is how it will be seen. You have to go around the mental block not run headfirst into it.
I'll go back to europe, I guess your going back to asia then since that's where your ancestors came from.
It’s the difference between being involuntarily mauled to death by a lion and willingly having your all your blood sucked out by a thousand leeches.
"Native" Americans were immigrants too user
this
It was purchased.
This is the correct answer.
>snowchinks
>native
Hmm.
Also, America didn't exist then. There was no cohesive group of "indigenous" just clans constantly at war with and enslaving one another.
this. might makes right. feathers shouldn't have been 85IQ low test bitches.
"Just as we have exterminated feebler races by merely overliving them, by monopolizing and absorbing, almost without conscious effort, everything necessary to their happiness,-so may we ourselves be exterminated at last by races capable of underliving us, of monopolizing all our necessities; races more patient, more self-denying, more fertile, and much less expensive for nature to support. These would doubtless inherit our wisdom, adopt our more useful inventions, continue the best of our industries-, perhaps even perpetuate what is most worthy to endure in our sciences and our arts. But they would scarcely regret our disappearance any more than we ourselves regret the extinction of the dinotherium or the ichthyosaurus."
Lafcadio Hearn
Out of the East 1895
“Sucks to suck.”
Though that wont look too good when we’re replaced and reduced to a handful of ghettos but if you’re not going to fight back at least complain about it for the love of god.
not only that but they did a far more complete genocide of the people they found here
Conquerors are not "immigrants." Immigrants enter an existing society. Conquerors subjugate or displace the society.
Red injuns were just chinks who overran the earlier inhabitants. Nothing native about these murdering primates.
the first "americans" were actually white caucasians anyway. look up "cactus hill" archaeology
This, and conquering can be defended against.
I believe we should begin defending ourselves.
You speak very clearly for someone with a 0.30 BAC chief shitsonbus.
Honestly though the idea that the United States purely conquered the Indians is also largely false. A lot of land was purchased not only from Indians directly but also from foreign governments.
While there were some unfortunate outcomes of our interactions with natives I was surprised how much positive interaction existed as well. I think that's why they don't teach certain parts of our founding in schools. It will totally obliterate the native victim narrative.
>How do I argue this?
You can't Zang.