Proof that races don't exist

Mixedrace children suffer from more health problems
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

Racemixing leads to outbreeding depression & pairings of non-complementary traits.

A massively well-funded study of over 100,000 schoolchildren found that “Adolescents who identify themselves as mixed race are at higher health and behavior risk than those of 1 race.” Indeed, even when controlling for education, socioeconomic status, and other factors, there is an across-the board higher rate of health risks amongst mixed race adolescents than mono-racial adolescents.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

One study found that White-Asian mixes had a 2x higher rate of being “diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse.”
eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc--baa081108.php

A study on Black-White mixes in agreement found that ”When it comes to engaging in risky/anti-social adolescent behavior, however, mixed race adolescents are stark outliers compared to both blacks and whites.” This holds true despite being raised in similar environments to mono-racial children.
msu.edu/~renn/RHE-_mixed_race.pdf

Often race-deniers and cultural Marxists will bring up Haldane’s rule, arguing that since races can mix and create fertile offspring, the genetic distance is not too great. Haldane’s rule is “when in the offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent, rare, or sterile, that sex is the heterogametic [XY] sex.”
nature.com/scitable/topicpage/haldane-s-rule-the-heterogametic-sex-1144

Indeed, although Black-White mixes are not sterile and males are not absent, males (the heterogametic sex) are more rare than females.
jstor.org/pss/1537084

Attached: 1549536604103.png (819x800, 474.98K)

>switching to a memeflag
Ok, weird.
Regardless, how does variation within a group disprove the existence of the group?

Wrong. Edwards never saw it as a fallacy.

Attached: SmartSelect_20200217-234041_Chrome.jpg (451x469, 151.82K)

>races don't exist
Honestly? Can you really not tell someone is a nigger by looking at their skin colored, spoiled attitude and childish actions? Even a blind man can tell he's talking to a coon. If you really believe what you say then you are another Hollywood wanna be and should probably just OD on fentanyl and leave everyone else alone.

>variation within groups
Why does this matter?

>At each poverty concentration level, the violent crime rate is substantially higher in black than in white census tracts.
Source archive.is/iRPsZ#selection-127.113-131.174
>Melanin concentration may directly correlate with aggression.
Source: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
>Race is a better predictor of crime than poverty.
Source: colorofcrime.com/2005/10/the-color-of-crime-2005/
>The Black-White IQ gap in America is equal to the gap in South Africa, even though SA is ruled by Blacks.
Source: psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/ravensiii.pdf
>The Black-White IQ gap exists even when both races are raised in identical environments.
Source: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016028969290028P
>93% of Black men who are murdered are killed by other Black men.
Source: bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/bvvc.pdf#page=3
>The Black-White IQ gap exists even when both races are raised in identical environments.
Source: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016028969290028P
>The percentage of Blacks and Hispanics in an area, not poverty, is the best predictor of crime.
Source: colorofcrime.com/2005/10/the-color-of-crime-2005/

Attached: 1567705313545.webm (710x400, 2.59M)

The fact blacks dont look exactly like us means races are real.

Oof wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genetic_Diversity:_Lewontin's_Fallacy

See Because with it, you can't classify humans into biological subgroups

Point 4,
Also works for comparison between literal fucking apes and humans

Attached: races.gif (2970x2483, 1023.76K)

So height differences between men and women don't exist because variation between men is greater than the variation between the average of men and women?

Retard.

Its Yas Forums, they will just construct some conspiracy theory to explain why actual population geneticists that publish in actual scientific journals can't be trusted to tell the truth, and instead non-scientist like Jared Taylor and Charles Murray are the real credible voices on the subject of race science.

10 shekels have been deposited into your accounts, rabbis

Wow you two, who knew that such a small percentage of variation at the DNA level could manifest itself in such striking variation in gene expression on the macro level.

Thanks for the education!

OP BTFO

>cant classify humans
Illogical you can already group europeans into various subgroups, this is complete fucking nonsense.

kike

>Who is James Watson?

>there's only one race: the hooman race

Attached: 1553439363675.jpg (713x713, 89.69K)

I already addressed muh Lewontin's fallacy here

>variation within a group is proof race doesn’t exist
>being this retarded

>kikes test genes to see if you’re allowed to live in kikeland
>race doesn’t exist
>being this retarded

>mixed race marrow requires specific mixed race donors
>race doesn’t exist
>being this retarded

i’m going to be real with you, man; just because you don’t want to believe something doesn’t mean it’s fake.

No one has claimed races are subgroups, because a subgroup is a categorization above species.

In other words, he's quibbling over how "race" is defined. Insisting racial groups have to be homogeneous is a blatantly dishonest straw man of the issues at present, you dumb nigger.

>addressed
>hurrr geographically-selected traits aren’t encoded in genes

I'd call you a nigger and tell you one of the first things you learn in medical school is race DOES exist and if you're insistent on ignoring it you're going to kill people.

>measures variations not related to race
>race doesn't exist

Why do niggers have denser bones if race is not real?

weird that despite variation within vs between populations within groups and between groups that different people in historically homogenous populations across all geographical locations manage to have distinctly common characteristics

very strange, is reality ignoring your hypothesis?

Some African group may, but not all.

because they choose to be better at basketball

Then what is race to you? Some metaphysical entity?

"I guess dogs don't have breeds then"
Anyone who has ever seen an animal understands the concept of race. Liberalism is a mental illness.

Literally all Subsaharan Africans are incapable of sharing bone marrow with all Europeans.

I like you.

All blacks sink like hammers in water because of their bone density you fucking retard.

Why do niggers have less brain volume than Caucasoids and Mongoloids if race is not real?

How? There is still noticeable variation between populations. What races were used in the study?

Can easily be explained by the amount of day light in certain regions. Also, brain size does NOT correlate with IQ, which is not surprising since IQ is complete bullshit, too.

>ctrl+f Lewontin's fallacy
>one based burger
>the commie retarded reflection attempt
The bulk of the fallacy is considering non-statistical criteria for race in the first place. There is less variation within groups by combining various factors.
Such a retarded method of non-classification would prevent any descriptive science of geology. Of course no one cares about distinguishing rocks, but not the hecking racerinos!

Lewontin used the traditional racial categories.

Attached: 1583259595965.jpg (480x468, 19.89K)

I said brain volume not brain size you fucking retard, Im talking about the amount of grey matter in their skulls idiot.

Only 1% of human DNA is different from a chimp so a retard claiming only 0.0003% of our DNA is different from niggers doesnt mean shit is really fucking stupid.

Lets look at the fact, the Sub Saharans are 20% an unknown species making them 20% non human in DNA. Which means niggers are not human.

Youve already been btfo but also haplogroups and mean variance doesnt mean shit really. The genetic similarities between humans and chimps are narrow but still significant.

Small differences matter.

As in negroid, mongoloid, caucasoid? Those are outdated categories that weren't put together with genetics in mind.

They still work though because they are based on cranial structure.

Continuum Fallacy: The Thread

Similar structures are reused because they are efficient, cost effective or whatever these things were built for. These things were designed, not evolved.

>lewontin's fallacy

Tribes exist

if races don't exist then why can i see them? checkmate scientists

>races don't exist
>black are not from the same sub spicies.
I goes way beyond races.

With the Word of God.

Attached: People Pleaser Rainbow.jpg (2550x3300, 691.48K)

Weird... because it kinda does on a META scale.

Attached: product-1597-main-main-big-1415043931.jpg (478x478, 60.88K)

It's not rigorous enough. The variations within those categories are enough to prove that they involve a bunch of races lumped together.
For instance, someone from Yemen and someone from Ireland would be considered to be the of the same race according to this form of categorization.